Everybodys talking about the parents.
Well most of them probably had no dad around and maybe the mom did the best she could.
Its too easy just to say blame the parents.
In this case, I agree.
I'm usually one of the first people to point fingers at the parents, as I truly believe that parenting (or lack thereof) can directly effect a child's personality and they way act in society, but,
in this case, I would have to say that the parents aren't to blame;
the kids are.
My dad was in the Navy for 20+ years and he was barely ever home when I was growing up, but I didn't turn into some little psychopathic demon. And,
even if I did, could I really blame my father for my actions? No, I couldn't. Neither can these kids. These kids can't blame anybody or anything but themselves for how they act. Like I said, I agree that parents have a strong influence on their children, but even the worst parenting in the world won't make your kid think that setting someone on fire and watching them die is even remotely close to being an acceptable thing to do.
These kids better get a life sentence for what they did. It's a miracle that the child who was set on fire ended up surviving, but that shouldn't tame their punishment what-so-ever. Try them as adults and give them life in prison. Then, after the first time they're raped in the shower and they begin to cry to the warden, have the warden say "at least you didn't get set on fire..."