• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

*2016 US Presidential Elections* - Candidates, Statistics, Campaign Timelines, Debates

BCsSecretAlias

Closed Account
Just like the financial crisis of 2008, the planets are aligning again but this time it favors the GOP

Ah yes, the crisis Trump was actually happy about because it provided him the opportunity, as an individual, to benefit greatly from the widespread suffering of his fellow americans - the same fellow americans he's asking to support him now.

there could never be a bigger silver platter than what's been handed them

This thing could have been over ages ago if the GOP had offered, and republicans backed, a more mainstream candidate with experience, advanced communication skills and strong character.
But neither happened, so the result remains in doubt.

Which is why if Trump loses I will all but be convinced it was a total sham and front to get Hillary elected.

Or maybe it will be because republicans chose the one person who has so many issues working against him that he's the one person Clinton is still capable of beating.

You mean like the same way Elizabeth Warren benefited? Trump has several hundred business ventures. Roughly 4 have filed for bankruptcy.

The possibility of a Trump presidency is becoming a reality to liberals like you which means an unwinding of the policies of the past 7 and a half years. I certainly hope so.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.

BCsSecretAlias

Closed Account
Trump is posturing to place moderators that he feels will be more fair than the usual lineup of leftwing partisans like Martha Raddatz and Gwen Ifill. Good for him.
 

Lee Van Queef

Maybe I Should Get A Little High First
How much of a chewing out did Bill get from Hillary when he fell asleep during the biggest speech of her life? Tim Kaine dealing with it is priceless.

 

Mayhem

Banned
Backlash for Trump after he lashes out at the Muslim parents of a dead U.S. soldier

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...b0aad4-5671-11e6-88eb-7dda4e2f2aec_story.html

Republican Donald Trump lashed out Saturday at two Muslim American parents who lost their son while he served in the U.S. military in Iraq and who appeared at the Democratic National Convention last week, stirring outrage among critics who said the episode proves that Trump lacks the compassion and temperament to be president.

Asked to comment on the convention speech of Khizr Khan, a Pakistani immigrant whose son, Army Capt. Humayun Khan, died in Iraq in 2004, Trump described Khan as “very emotional” and said he “probably looked like a nice guy to me” — then accused him of being controlled by the Clinton campaign.

“Who wrote that? Did Hillary’s scriptwriters write it?” he asked in an interview with ABC.

Trump also questioned why Khan’s wife, Ghazala, did not speak on stage, despite the fact that she sat for an interview with MSNBC the following day.

“His wife, if you look at his wife, she was standing there. She had nothing to say. She probably, maybe she wasn’t allowed to have anything to say,” he said. “You tell me, but plenty of people have written that. She was extremely quiet and it looked like she had nothing to say.”

The Khans appeared in Philadelphia on Thursday, the same night that Trump’s Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, formally accepted her party’s nomination. Khizr Khan’s moving remarks quickly reverberated beyond the arena, and their effects have since spilled out onto the campaign trail. In an interview the following day with MSNBC, Ghazala Khan said she did not speak because she is still devastated by her son’s death and grows emotional when she sees his picture.

Although only the latest instance in which Trump has attacked a convention speaker, the Republican nominee’s remarks drew strong rebukes Saturday — but only silence from several senior GOP leaders, including House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the vice-presidential nominee, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence.

“Trump’s slur against Captain Khan’s mother is, even for him, beyond the pale,” tweeted John Weaver, a Republican strategist for Ohio Gov. John Kasich. “He has NO redeeming qualities.”

Matt Mackowiak, another GOP strategist, tweeted: “There is only one response for Trump to the criticism: ‘As an American, I deeply appreciate the patriotic sacrifice of the Khan family.’”

The Clinton campaign’s Karen Finney offered this: “Trump is truly shameless to attack the family of an American hero. Many thanks to the Khan family for your sacrifice, we stand with you.”

In Youngstown, Ohio, on Saturday, Clinton addressed the controversy as part of a larger discussion of Trump’s temperament.

“He attacked the distinguished father of a soldier who had sacrificed himself for his unit, Captain Khan,” Clinton said in disbelief.

In a statement earlier that day, she said: “I was very moved to see Ghazala Khan stand bravely and with dignity in support of her son on Thursday night. And I was very moved to hear her speak last night, bravely and with dignity, about her son’s life and the ultimate sacrifice he made for his country.”

With Ghazala by his side on the convention stage last week, Khizr Khan blasted Trump’s rhetoric on Muslims and immigrants. Pulling his pocket version of the Constitution from his jacket, he questioned whether Trump has read the document.

“You have sacrificed nothing and no one,” Khan said in a halting and forceful voice.


In the ABC interview, Trump pointed to the sacrifices he has made as a businessman: “I think I’ve made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard. I’ve created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs,” Trump said.

“I think my popularity with the vets is through the roof,” he added later.

The backlash was swift and unsparing Saturday as high-profile political strategists from both parties tore into Trump and questioned his character.

“Trump revealed exactly who he is in this answer and it’s not pretty. A man this callous and cruel can’t be President,” former Obama senior advisor Dan Pfieffer fired off on Twitter Saturday afternoon.

“There is still a role for shame in society,” Stuart Stevens, former top strategist to 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney, tweeted out Saturday in response.

Paul Rieckoff, the founder and chief executive of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, told ABC that Trump’s comparison of his own sacrifice to that of war veterans is an insult.

“For anyone to compare their ‘sacrifice’ to a Gold Star family member is insulting, foolish and ignorant. Especially someone who has never served himself and has no children serving,” he said. “Our country has been at war for a decade and a half, and the truth is most Americans have sacrificed nothing. Most of them are smart and grounded enough to admit it.”

In a statement titled “Setting the Record Straight,” Trump called Humayun Khan a “hero” but rejected his father’s accusations.

“While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things,” the statement read. “If I become President, I will make America safe again.”

Trump avoided the draft during the Vietnam War through several student deferments. He was later medically disqualified from service.

Several of Trump’s critics said Saturday that Trump’s attacks on the Khans are part of a broader pattern in which the candidate lashes out at others in extraordinarily personal terms for criticizing him. Many say that voters should worry about what it means in terms of Trump’s temperament and, in particular, how he would deal with foreign leaders as president.

“He’s a person that has no self-control. He just has no sense of decency or empathy when it comes to dealing with others,”
said Tim Miller, a veteran GOP strategist and former communications director for Jeb Bush. “It’s always zero sum. You compliment me, I compliment you. You criticize me, I mock you. That’s what this is about. It’s all about him and his egotism.”

Miller added that Trump’s past statements, including his attack against Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) for being a prisoner of war, have given Democrats an opening to defend the service of veterans in direct response to the Republican nominee’s own words.

Humayun Khan had completed four years of service before he was sent to Iraq. He was killed four months after he arrived.

To cope with their grief in the aftermath of his death, the Khans moved to Charlottesville in order to be closer to their two other sons, who were attending the University of Virginia, as Humayun had. The Khans have also described at times attending funerals for other soldiers at Arlington National Cemetery as a way of remembering their son.

In the MSNBC interview, Ghazala Khan explained why she did not speak Thursday: “I was very nervous because I cannot see my son’s picture, and I cannot even come in the room where his pictures are. And that’s why. I saw the picture [behind] my back, I couldn’t take it and I controlled myself at that time.”

Trump’s comments about the Khan family are the latest in a series of searing attacks against individuals who spoke at the Democratic convention, including retired four-star Marine Corps Gen. John Allen, whom Trump referred to as a “failed general” during a campaign event in Denver Friday evening.

On the second day of a bus tour through Pennsylvania and Ohio with running mate Sen. Tim Kaine, Clinton continued to build a damaging portrait of the real estate mogul, an extension of the dominant theme at the convention last week to paint the Republican nominee as a self-interested and dangerous “con.”

“He loses his cool at the slightest provocation,” Clinton said of Trump in Johnstown, Pa. “Just yesterday, he went after retired general John Allen, who commanded our troops in Afghanistan. Gen. Allen is a distinguished Marine, a hero and a patriot. Donald Trump called him a failed general. Why? Because he does not believe Donald Trump should be commander in chief.

“Well, I’d say that proves it,” she continued. “Our commander in chief shouldn’t deride or insult our generals, retired or otherwise.”

In Pittsburgh later Saturday, Clinton did not reference the Khans directly but told a supportive crowd that Trump’s thin skin makes him unfit to lead the country. “We’ve never had someone run for president who is so manifestly temperamentally unfit and unqualified,” she said to applause.

Clinton had apparently planned to address the back and forth between Trump and the Khans during her first public remarks Saturday in Johnstown. CNN reported that a producer near the stage saw that portion of the script on Clinton’s teleprompter.

In the MSNBC interview Friday, Khizr Khan called on McConnell (R-Ky.) and Ryan (R-Wis.) — both of whom he called patriots and decent — to repudiate Trump’s comments about Muslims and other immigrants. “This is a moral imperative for both leaders, to say to him, ‘Enough.’ 

“The only reason they’re not repudiating this, his behavior, his threat to our democracy, our decency, our foundation is just because of political consequences,” he said in the interview.

Aides to Ryan and McConnell would not respond directly to the Khans, nor would they address what Trump had to say about the couple
. Pence directed media inquiries to the Trump campaign.

Don Stewart, a spokesman for McConnell, pointed to a December statement in which McConnell said Trump’s suggestion of a Muslim travel ban was “completely and totally inconsistent with American values.”

AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Ryan, also noted the speaker’s past denunciation of the travel ban.

“The speaker has made clear many times that he rejects this idea and himself has talked about how Muslim Americans have made the ultimate sacrifice for this country,” she said.

So, anyone see the glaring similarities between one egotistical, angry and deranged Republican and a certain other? Throwing shit fits while going after Vets, making shit up to fit their own backward narrative? Anyone, anyone?

Anyone see the similarities between two cowards who rush to cover their own glaring inadequacies?

"Support Our Troops....as long as they vote the way we tell them". And lash out at them like meth addicted chimpanzees when they don't.

“He’s a person that has no self-control. He just has no sense of decency or empathy when it comes to dealing with others,” It’s all about him and his egotism.”
Couldn't have said it better myself.

A few years ago I had some less than complimentary things to say about Gen. Schwatzkopf and Gen. Petraeus. The Patriot Brigade (and their mouth-breathing leader) came after me with brick bats. Bonespur goes after General Allen (an officer that was actually worth serving for), and crickets. You chickenshits say absolutely nothing about it. Nothing. You punk-ass cowards. All of you. You also let this caricature of a human being slam John McCain and say nothing. Punk-ass cowards. All of you.
Khizr Khan called on McConnell (R-Ky.) and Ryan (R-Wis.) ....to repudiate Trump’s comments about Muslims and other immigrants.
Aides to Ryan and McConnell would not respond directly to the Khans, nor would they address what Trump had to say about the couple.
Punk-ass cowards leading and being led by other punk-ass cowards. Great Party you got there. And it really shows around here.

And hey BC, General Allen is a Marine. Anything....no? Too much of a coward to stand up for your Dad's service? Would rather follow someone who is as batshit idiotic as you are than watch your own fathers back? Yeah, Pops is reeeal proud of his hayseed progeny. The next time it rains, it's your Dad pissing on you.
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Good grief, the way this dead Muslim vet's advocates (namely EVERY MSM propaganda outfit) are portraying him and his religion, you'd think a thousand of our deceased military would have been of the Muslim persuasion.


So there has been 10 to 14 deceased vets of the Islamic persuasion since 9-11...wtf?


Is that even a half a percent of the total deceased vets since 9-11?
 

Supafly

Moderator
Staff member
Bronze Member
Trump is spiralling off into more and more madness. As much as Clinton has done wrong decisions, come fall, he will be so off, only the hardcore crazies will vote for him.

The luck of Clinton:

It doesn't really matter what Assange or others throw on the media scene, the world is so used to hear this, it kind of numbs.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Khizr Khan: Trump has a 'black soul'

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/31/politics/khizr-khan-donald-trump-black-soul/

Excellent Video if you click the link
Khizr Khan, the father of a Muslim US soldier slain in Iraq in 2004, said Sunday that Donald Trump has a "black soul," indicating he lacks empathy and compassion.

Khan told CNN's Jim Acosta on "State of the Union" that he hopes Trump's family will "teach him some empathy."

"He is a black soul, and this is totally unfit for the leadership of this country," Khan said. "The love and affection that we have received affirms that our grief -- that our experience in this country has been correct and positive. The world is receiving us like we have never seen. They have seen the blackness of his character, of his soul."

Khan moved into the national spotlight after he pulled out a pocket copy of the Constitution during his speech at the Democratic National Convention. He said Trump would have barred his Muslim family from entering the United States.

Khan said Sunday Trump's "policy, his practices, do not reflect that he has any understanding of the basic, fundamental constitutional principles of this country."

"He talks about excluding people, disrespecting judges, the entire judicial system, immigrants, Muslim immigrants. These are divisive rhetoric that are totally against the basic constitutional principles," he said.

He also said Trump lacks key traits that presidents need.
"Two things are absolutely necessary in any leader or any person who aspires, wishes, to be a leader. That is moral compass and second is empathy," Khan said.
Khan called on House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to withdraw their support for Trump.

"It is a moral obligation -- history will not forgive them," he said. "This election will pass, but history will be written. The lack of moral courage with remain a burden on their souls."
He said those GOP leaders have a "moral, ethical obligation to not worry about the votes but repudiate him; withdraw the support. If they do not, I will continue to speak."

Khan pushed back on Trump's suggestion that his wife, who was also on stage at the DNC, was not allowed to speak. He said she has high blood pressure and didn't want to speak for fear she wouldn't be able to hold herself together discussing her Gold Star son on stage.

"For this candidate for presidency to not be aware of the respect of a Gold Star mother standing there, and he had to take that shot at her, this is height of ignorance," Khan said. "This is why I showed him (the) Constitution. Had he read that, he would know the status a Gold Star mother holds in this nation."

Trump had first suggested Khan's wife was not allowed to speak in an interview with The New York Times' Maureen Dowd, saying: "I'd like to hear his wife say something."
Then, he told Stephanopoulos, "If you look at his wife, she was standing there, she had nothing to say, she probably -- maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say, you tell me."

Khizr Khan's wife, Ghazala Khan, responded to Trump in a Washington Post op-ed Sunday.

"Walking onto the convention stage, with a huge picture of my son behind me, I could hardly control myself. What mother could? Donald Trump has children whom he loves. Does he really need to wonder why I did not speak?" she wrote.

"Donald Trump said that maybe I wasn't allowed to say anything. That is not true," Ghazala Khan wrote. "My husband asked me if I wanted to speak, but I told him I could not. My religion teaches me that all human beings are equal in God's eyes. Husband and wife are part of each other; you should love and respect each other so you can take care of the family."
Khizr Khan had also said in an interview with The Washington Post that Trump's attack on his wife was "typical of a person without a soul."

"Emotionally and physically -- she just couldn't even stand there, and when we left, as soon as we got off camera, she just broke down," Khan told the Post. "And the people inside, the staff, were holding her, consoling her. She was just totally emotionally spent. Only those parents that have lost their son or daughter could imagine the pain that such a memory causes."
Trump, in a statement released Saturday by his campaign, called Capt. Khan "a hero to our country and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe."

But after Khan's Sunday CNN interview, Trump tweeted: "I was viciously attacked by Mr. Khan at the Democratic Convention. Am I not allowed to respond? Hillary voted for the Iraq war, not me!"

Earlier Sunday, he also tweeted: "Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!"

Trump also pushed back on Khan's on-stage suggestion that he has "sacrificed nothing and no one" in an interview with with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos aired Sunday on "This Week."

"I think I've made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard,"
Trump said. "I've created thousands and thousands of jobs, tens of thousands of jobs, built great structures. I've had tremendous success. I think I've done a lot."

But hey, we still haven't seen the DD-214.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Oh boy. This woman has no soul. No heart. No emotion that could be considered even remotely human.
You told the entire world it was because of a video for an entire month. It was your buddie Sidney Blumenthal's idea to run with the story and lie to the world. Why would anyone doubt you told the same to this mother?
I don't think this repulsive creature is capable of telling the truth about anything. That's a serious mental disorder.

Anway. look at this mothers face. This is what real greif looks like. Very different from those actors from Orlando and Sandy Hook smiling there asses off from day one.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
This is pretty amazing considering that the election is 100 days away and Texas is, at least for the time being, a hard red state. The Houston Chronicle, one of the most influential and widely-read newspapers in the state, endorsed Hillary Clinton for president today in their Op-Ed section.

For Hillary Clinton

These are unsettling times that require a steady hand, and that’s not Donald Trump.

On Nov. 8, 2016, the American people will decide between two presidential contenders who represent the starkest political choice in living memory. They will choose between one candidate with vast experience and a lifelong dedication to public service and another totally lacking in qualifications to be president. They will decide whether they prefer someone deeply familiar with the issues that are important to this nation or a person whose paper-thin, bumper-sticker proposals would be dangerous to the nation and the world if somehow they were enacted.

Her opponent

The Chronicle editorial page does not typically endorse early in an election cycle; we prefer waiting for the campaign to play out and for issues to emerge and be addressed. We make an exception in the 2016 presidential race, because the choice between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump is not merely political. It is something much more basic than party preference.

An election between the Democrat Clinton and, let’s say, the Republican Jeb Bush or John Kasich or Marco Rubio, even the hyper-ideological Ted Cruz, would spark a much-needed debate about the role of government and the nation’s future, about each candidate’s experience and abilities. But those Republican hopefuls have been vanquished. To choose the candidate who defeated them — fairly and decisively, we should point out — is to repudiate the most basic notions of competence and capability.

Any one of Trump’s less-than-sterling qualities — his erratic temperament, his dodgy business practices, his racism, his Putin-like strongman inclinations and faux-populist demagoguery, his contempt for the rule of law, his ignorance — is enough to be disqualifying. His convention-speech comment, ”I alone can fix it,” should make every American shudder. He is, we believe, a danger to the Republic.

It’s telling that so many Republicans have distanced themselves from their party’s nominee. That sizeable list includes a number of prominent Texans, Bush family members foremost among them, as well as Sen. Cruz and House Speaker Joe Straus. These stalwart Republicans are concerned not only about the future of their party (and, with the exception of the two Bush presidents, their own political careers), but, more important, they’re concerned about the future of this nation.

It would not be surprising to discover that these experienced politicians and public servants share the existential concern that first lady Michelle Obama raised in her powerful speech on behalf of Clinton at the party convention in Philadelphia: “Because when you have the nuclear codes at your fingertips and the military at your command, you can’t make snap decisions. You can’t have a thin skin or a tendency to lash out. You need to be steady and measured and well-informed.”

Experience

Americans know Hillary Clinton; post-Philadelphia, they’re even better acquainted with “the real Hillary Clinton,” as her husband phrased it. After her quarter century and more in the public eye, they know her strengths and her weaknesses. Anyone who has paid even a modicum of attention to her experience as first lady, as U.S. senator, as secretary of state and as candidate for president will have at least a general notion of her positions on the issues. As President Obama noted, she’s the most qualified person in years to serve as president — “and that includes Bill and me.” The only candidate to come close is George HW. Bush.

Whether voters like her personally is almost irrelevant at this “moment of reckoning,” to use Clinton’s words. She herself concedes that she’s not a natural campaigner. She lacks Obama’s oratorical gifts or her husband’s folksy ability to connect with crowds. Too often she comes across as calculated, inauthentic. We’re confident that she is, indeed, “steady and measured and well-informed” and that she would be a much better president than a presidential candidate.

The issues

On the issues, there’s no comparison in terms of thoughtfulness, thoroughness and practicality. Acknowledging the influence of erstwhile competitor Bernie Sanders, for example, she will focus as president on repairing an economy that has left many working people behind and struggling. She will address income inequality and wage stagnation and will work to create jobs. She’ll work with Congress to end tax loopholes, noting as she did on CBS’s “Sixty Minutes” last weekend that an executive shouldn’t be paying the same tax rate as his secretary. She also will push for equal pay for women, increasing the minimum wage and expanding tax credits for poorer families.

Immigration reform

Rejecting the ridiculous border-wall notion her opponent famously touts, she’ll push for comprehensive immigration reform, building on a sensible plan that passed the U.S. Senate three years ago, only to be held hostage by a rump group of tea-party opponents in the House. She has said she intends within the first 100 days of her administration to introduce a path for the undocumented among us to earn citizenship.

Health care

Health care has been a decades-long issue for Clinton, at least since her days as the first lady of her adopted state of Arkansas. As first lady in the White House a few years later, her failed health initiative led to the creation of CHIP, the immensely successful children’s health insurance program. She will work to improve the Affordable Care Act, not abolish it.

Energy

On energy, an issue of importance to Houston, she acknowledges the seriousness of climate change, the most “consequential, urgent, sweeping” problem the world faces. She has said she wants the United States to be the “clean energy superpower of the 21st century.”

She also acknowledges that clean-energy reforms will result in economic casualties, among them the coal industry. She has proposed a $30 billion plan to revitalize communities where coal production is in decline and, as Bill Clinton mentioned in his convention speech last week, she intends to dispatch him to West Virginia to help struggling families and communities build a viable economic future.

Hillary Clinton has said she sees natural gas as a bridge fuel and foresees a new economy built on rapidly increasing shares of renewable energy. She has a record of supporting fracking, and she supports the Paris agreement on climate change.

Foreign affairs

On trade, another vital Houston issue, we have our differences with the Democrat. Although she now says she opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade deal we support, we’re confident she will be adept at negotiating deals that would grow wages and jobs and that would protect American workers. Despite his vaunted deal-making claims, her opponent, we suspect, would be lost at sea trying to meet the nation’s trade goals.

On foreign affairs, the former secretary of state is knowledgeable, dependable and trusted worldwide, unlike her blusterous opponent whose outrageous remarks last week about Russia were merely the most recent bizarre outburst to unsettle our allies. Needless to say, Clinton supports NATO, unlike Trump who, in the words of columnist Timothy Egan, “now stands ready to repudiate nearly 70 years of security for our European allies under an ‘America First’ banner. . . .”

Temperament

We could go on with issues, including her plans for sensible gun safety and for combatting terrorism — her policy positions are laid out in detail on her campaign website — but issues in this election are almost secondary to questions of character and trustworthiness. We reject the “cartoon version” of Hillary Clinton (again to borrow her husband’s phrase) in favor of a presidential candidate who has the temperament, the ability and the experience to lead this nation.

These are unsettling times, even if they’re not the dark, dystopian end times that Trump lays out. They require a steady hand. That’s not Donald Trump.

The times also require a person who envisions a hopeful future for this nation, a person who has faith in the strong, prosperous and confident America we hope to bequeath our children and grandchildren, as first lady Michelle Obama so eloquently envisioned in Philadelphia. That’s not Donald Trump’s America.

It is Hillary Clinton’s, who reminded her listeners Thursday night that “When there are no ceilings, the sky’s the limit.”

America’s first female president would be in the Oval Office more than a century and a half after a determined group of women launched the women’s suffrage movement, almost a century after women in this country won the right to vote. It’s a milestone, to be sure. Few could have imagined it would be so consequential.

I do not ever recall such an early endorsement of anyone, especially a candidate for president, by this newspaper. Not saying I necessarily agree with their opinion but they certainly bring up significant points to consider regardless of your political bias. Worthy of discussion whether you agree or not.
 

pool_hustler

Be careful what you wish for, it might come true!
So there has been 10 to 14 deceased vets of the Islamic persuasion since 9-11...wtf?


Is that even a half a percent of the total deceased vets since 9-11?

Well, being as they only make up about 1% of the US population...

American Muslims also fought and died for this country in WWII, Korea, Viet Nam.
 

Straight Shooter

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
13754410_935487263230254_6690167472819078685_n.jpg
 

pool_hustler

Be careful what you wish for, it might come true!
26 deaths shy of 1%
Would it be ok to respect their sacrifice had 26 more died?
What is the Trump math on this sort of thing?
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Or maybe conservatives were right about him. Maybe he is, indeed, a traitor. May be he wants to destroy the US. Maybe having Trump elected is part of his plan t achieve that.


26 deaths shy of 1%
Would it be ok to respect their sacrifice had 26 more died?
What is the Trump math on this sort of thing?

How many muslim fought for the US ?
How many US citizens were muslim ?
Which part of the muslim population of the us died for theiir country ? How does it compares to the death rate of non muslim ?
 
Top