• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

America - worlds' freedom fighters or terrorists ???

Is America the worlds' freedom fighter or terrorist ?

  • Freedom Fighter

    Votes: 28 45.9%
  • Terrorists

    Votes: 33 54.1%

  • Total voters
    61

Roughneck

Stick with Freeones
The US is continually blamed for the incitements and intolerance by western European nations that the US itself has absolutely no partake in at its very foundation of leaders and people. It's rather sad that the nation of not only the greatest diversity, but the greatest attitude of ultimate tolerance -- not just inside its own borders, but its leadership has always, and will continue to always reflect that same attitude. It has since Day 1 -- hundreds of years before the US became a nation. It's still at the very foundation.
Our practice of our ideals has been less than perfect, from slavery to our foreign affairs - but I can't find any other nation founded with such great ideals. Despite how much I dislike (and sometimes downright HATE) our government, I love my country and cherish her heritage and ideals. I wouldn't live anywhere else in the world.

So instead of blaming the US, one should really look at the "we wish were still Imperalist nations" as well as those who are still plagued by their centuries of Imperialism, as well as the Vatican (which I think more of a factor when it comes to the IRA), which the US continues to question, regularly -- and something we should all respect. Those of Muslim faith, or those of "Old Europe," we tried to continue to be Imperialists through even the '50s, that think the US is a Zionist entity, or really the cause of many of our hatred issues continuing plague our planet, really need to come to the US.

I rather tire of the statements made by foreign nationals which are in complete hypocrisy, and they will accept absolutely no blame on their own nation's shoulders -- not in the past, but more importantly, not even their selfish interests now. As an American, I'm biased. But I work with so many 1st generation immigrants who come to this country for a reason, and have been exposed to so many cultures, believes and horrors of their people. And as an American, I really strive to watch foreign media and directly talk to people.

Noting those that are simply full of "blame the US rhetoric, instead of "looking at their own issues" and the ones that honestly take a look at "this is what American is thinking, doing, and why it is wrong/right." Especially the latter, which I often disagree with, but it does show they take the time to understand what American is, the decisions it's leaders make that reflect it, etc...
Yep :thumbsup:

The US changed in WWII. We haven't changed since.
Again Prof., I think you aren't thinking far enough.

The US fundamentally changed with the Civil War.
But the fight for the "Spirit" of America has been going on since the inception of the Republic (why else would the Constitution NOT be ratified without TEN Amendments added to it first? Catch my drift? ;))

What everyone is bitching about is the same thing that happened during the Cold War. But we're no longer the "lesser of two evils." In fact, no longer can you choose to blame two different superpowers -- you have only one to blame. In fact, all while you sling mud at the US, there's a much better scapegoat in China -- one that is actually destroying the environment far worse than the US, using more resources, etc... that goes so under-reported.

Just wait until 2020! You won't believe how much you wished you didn't leave China out of the Kyoto Treaty. Although the US continues to work with China to bring their emissions and pollution under control far more than any European nation has even attempted -- because they are so focused on their "single superpower scapegoat."
Like I said before - just wait till another "superpower" emerges on the field, then the blame shift will begin again

Thanks dd. I'll post it as soon as it's finished on my "lyrics" thread I suppose. It still needs work. Maybe you'll hear it on the radio someday. It has a really loud wailing guitar solo. They'll ban it in Texas.
People dump on Texas too often and I don't think it's fair or right. people accuse Texans with the same prejudiced stereotype they accuise Texans of practising. :dunno:

The U.S. went to war to fight the spread of a political system, not to defend citizens. They killed millions of South and North Vietnamese in horrific ways and lost a shitload of teenage American lives for some bizarre political rhetoric scare stories not unlike the ones we're fed today.
"Millions" ? I don't essentially disagree with this part but I disagree with the "millions" comment.

In most of the world, the USSR is still a much-maligned and criticized powerhouse, in the same way America is criticized, only the USSR has disintegrated and America is more powerful than ever. Most people who know politics know what USSR did in Afghanistan and think it was absolutely disgusting, no better and no worse than our own track record.
I'm not so sure about that either. For all our faults, we stopped persecuting people for their political beliefs centuries ago (for example).

If you hear mostly anti-American rhetoric here in America it's probably because the days of hating the USSR and Communism are long over, since we effectively killed communism. Nothing wrong with killing communism, imo, but I also think capitalism should be burned at the stake and then we should all rejoice in a brave new world in which freedom democracy HONESTY EQUALITY and SHARING are the core principles rather than money, business, money, profit, expansion, money, invasion and individualism. And money.
You don't see the HUGE contradictions in this post? Death of communism but also death of individualism? Capitalism is founded on the principles of choice and voluntary actions - I would never wish for it's death.

Good points. But take my word for it, SOME of those in America who detest the government and its foreign policy, and MOST of those in other countries who feel that way, are not doing it because it's cool. Sure, some people are bandwagon political apathetics, who go with what is cool and rebellious, but I do not despise the American government because it's cool. I don't want it to be cool. What's cool to me, are the principles above... freedom, democracy, equality, sharing... and peace. Without nationalism, patriotism, superiority complexes, and with a very very heavy commitment to the United Nations.
Commitment to the UN? Why? So others can dictate policy and use our resources to achieve that policy? I'm tired of funding for stupid UN plicies with my tax money and I tire of American boys and girls shedding blood for UN causes. I am SICK and TIRED of the UN. I will not sign away my soverignity to the "world government". I don't want the united States involved in the affairs of other nations.

I am tired of these arguments, too, they all seem to be the same. The only reason these arguments exist is that this board is predominantly American. If there were equal representations of every nation on this earth, by population, first of all we'd have a lot of Chinese and Indian points of view and secondly, these right wing patriots would be completely drowned out.
Think again. I'm not saying "the Right Wing patriots" are right. I'm saying that people value individuality and choice more than you give them credit for. As such, they may not readily ascribe or subscribe to your PoV.

That's my dream world. The world in which majority rules, and the majority want peace.
Majority rules sucks if you're a minority.

Seriously, though, while every government is hypocritical, no-one has perfected the art quite like the US Republicans.
To say nothing about the Democrats :rolleyes:

If you think Saudi princes championing Jihad and Islam while living in absolute luxury is hypocritical, ohhh man that has nothing on the words that come out of that man that stole the Presidency (GWB) from the guy that wanted nothing more than to clean up the mess America has been making of the world - Al Gore that is.
Dubya "stole" the election... :sleep: Huh? What? You said something? Sorry, I fell asleep with the same old, worn out blatantly false rhetoric about Dubya being evil incarnate (not that he isn't) BECAUSE he STOLE the election from Prince Charming Al-Gore.


cheers,
 

Member2019

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
What about Japan? South Korea? Others?

This is yery weird... The Countries that have the bomb try to prevent other countries from getting it - that is hypocrisy! I think every country should have nuclear weapons... It would make conflicts much less likely. I don't think Iran or North Korea would use it if they get it - only the USA have been criminal enough to do that.
"Teerorism is the War of the poor. War is the Terrorism of the rich" - Sir Peter Ustinov
What about Japan? What about South Korea?

They do not want nuclear weapons! That's what the US policy is about! It's not just about "the US being a hypocrite!

Japan doesn't want the DPRK to have nukes, because it doesn't want to be in a position to deter that with the same. Because if Japan has nukes, it then becomes a target of China. Japan could be decimated with just 4-5 thermonuclear weapons, whereas China would take possibly hundreds (or at least several dozen to do enough damage in return). The only preferrable situation for Japan is if the DPRK does not have nukes!

No offense, but I don't think many of you really think this stuff through. It's not just about the US! You guys have such anti-US tunnel vision you don't even think of all the other considerations -- namely countries that ally themselves with the US for a reason!

In other words, I bet you really suck at chess because you focus on the queen only to have yours taken by another unit. ;)
 

Member2019

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Damned if you do, damned if you don't ...

I'm sorry but when you have more to gain by controlling an area than just doing the right thing. It looks bad. If America wanted to save the world they would be in places like Africa and Asia.
No matter what America does, it looks bad. People think Clinton was loved, but it was quite a different story when he was in. Same deal with Reagan too.

I think an Australian ambassador said it best recently regarding the situation with the DPRK (paraphrased). "Everyone complains about the United States. But everyone always looks to the United States to fix everything."

The US has had many bad tastes in trying to prevent wars in Africa and Asia. If anything, they just unify former enemies against American interference -- even when the UN is involved. They don't see any difference.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Terrorist

In fact, they are nbot terrorists, more like freedom fighters but the thing is that USA are now fighting against the results of what they did during the cold war : To fight the communism and make sure that it won,'t get to the power in some countries, they organised plots against democratics governments and put dictators instead ( did so in Iran, Chili...) or they supports armies fighting against USSR (Afghanistan).

To fight USSR, USA have created monsters. But, as in every man-created monster storie, these monsters are now fighting their creators...

We count on USA to fix everything because they are the ones who broke everything

What about Japan? What about South Korea?

They do not want nuclear weapons! That's what the US policy is about! It's not just about "the US being a hypocrite!

Japan doesn't want the DPRK to have nukes, because it doesn't want to be in a position to deter that with the same. Because if Japan has nukes, it then becomes a target of China. Japan could be decimated with just 4-5 thermonuclear weapons, whereas China would take possibly hundreds (or at least several dozen to do enough damage in return). The only preferrable situation for Japan is if the DPRK does not have nukes!
I think it has also something to deal with Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I mean, Japan knows better than any other country in the world how nukes are terrible...
 

BNF

Ex-SuperMod
Terrorist

We count on USA to fix everything because they are the ones who broke everything

:sleep: Ivory Coast, the sloppy unification of Vietnam, and of course Viet... I mean Algeria, France's Vietnam war:

... argues convincingly that there were remarkable similarities between the Algerian and Vietnam wars. These include: the use of torture; the looming precedent of the Nuremberg trials; anti-colonial revolt; the undermining of democracy; the murky style of diplomacy; the racist views of Western troops; the unjustified optimism and arrogance of military and political leaders; the forced relocation of civilian populations; and the transformation of the two nations' countrysides into vast "free fire zones," in which the military sought to destroy everything that moved.

... I'm to busy to go on...
 

Werewolf

Giggidy giggidy goo!
Re: What about Japan? South Korea? Others?

What about Japan? What about South Korea?

They do not want nuclear weapons! That's what the US policy is about! It's not just about "the US being a hypocrite!

Japan doesn't want the DPRK to have nukes, because it doesn't want to be in a position to deter that with the same. Because if Japan has nukes, it then becomes a target of China. Japan could be decimated with just 4-5 thermonuclear weapons, whereas China would take possibly hundreds (or at least several dozen to do enough damage in return). The only preferrable situation for Japan is if the DPRK does not have nukes!

No offense, but I don't think many of you really think this stuff through. It's not just about the US! You guys have such anti-US tunnel vision you don't even think of all the other considerations -- namely countries that ally themselves with the US for a reason!

In other words, I bet you really suck at chess because you focus on the queen only to have yours taken by another unit. ;)

Of course there are Countries that don`t want the bomb. Being German, mine is one of them... I don't think it's a question of how much bombs you need to diminish a Country - and one nuke is terrible enough. No country would risk a war when it's in danger of being nuked (at least I hope so). And even if your enemy has only one nuclear bomb, they could still get your capital off the map... At this time seven (?) countries have the bomb and they tell others "if you try to get it, we will take measures". That is Hypocrisy!!! I mean, do we -the others - have a guarantee that one of these seven countries will always be reasonable? No, we don't! So I think everyone should have it.

Oh yeah I'm so anti-Us that I eat US-food, wear US-clothes, listen to US-Bands and watch US-Shows regularly... Bullshit! But, believe or not, your Government sucks!

Chess? I haven't played in a while but I used to be quite good... ;)
 

miurajota

Love your enemies. It'll make 'em crazy.
Oh my, what a debate.

It`s actually pretty simple : american citizens, probably some of the greatest in the world, on the other hand, american politicians F@#$%^^%$#$$#
 

thebear247

Pain heals, chicks dig scars, Freeones lasts forever
Neither. We only go to war when we have to. We need to stop trying to save everyone else and let other countries get off their asses and do something for once. People bitch about the US and then run to them when they need help.

you may dear get a rep well said
 

jasonk282

Banned
Neither. We only go to war when we have to. We need to stop trying to save everyone else and let other countries get off their asses and do something for once. People bitch about the US and then run to them when they need help.


100% agreed and I spent 10 years in the Army defending this great country. As fo the UN I served in Bosina with the 82nd and they are shit. They have no REAL power and just about every regime does not respect them. Bring in the good ole US of A with our planes and tanks and suddenly everyone wants to be our friend. Also for what happened on 9/11 the UN said no, but come on people we don;t need the UN to say if we can go to war we need the vote from Congress. I did 2 tours in Iraq and fought for this country.

Call me a freedom fighter or Terrorist if you want because when it comes down to it I DEFENDED YOUR RIGHT WHILE YOU PROTESTED MY DUTY.
 

Skyraider22

The One and Only Big Daddy
I did not vote because I think our problem is we try to be everyone's big brother and protect our intrests in other countries and we come off as being terrorists because from my understanding most of those people from other countries don't won't us there.Don't get me wrong I think it is noble at times,but don't overstay your welcome and do what it takes to correct the problem.That is my:2 cents:
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...
One man's "Freedom Fighter" is another man's "Terrorist".


Some things will never change...
 

deltaoscarbravo

Private Messages; please send me some!
Hard one to call.

Invasion of Iraq was an act of terrorism, no doubt.

Invasion of Afghanistan was justified.
 

Facetious

Moderated
There is too much appeasement from the U.S. to the world to be terrorists. The U.S. is too scared to offend anyone or hurt their poor feelings.

While Muslims are killing people thru out the world. 50 countries this religion of peace is at war with right now.


A belated Thank You MILF Man, I agree with your statement.

As the strategy goes - "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" :laugh:
Isn't it amazing how the extreme far left Amerikans would side with a extreme far right islamic faction in order to overthrow America ?

That's yet another reason why I'm dead set against the welfare state ! :D
These pricks should be working for a living instead of plotting against the country which they cozily reside -> America.
Not only are these miscreantic burdens of society leeching the tax paying - working populous, they acting as an effective 5th column, thorn in our side ! :flame: :rofl:


fifth column n. A clandestine subversive organization working within a country to further an invading enemy's military and political aims.
 

Bloodshot Scott

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Just corrupt, that's all. Just corrupt. We were misled into Iraq, by both dem and repub alike, till some 70+% of Americans were all for it. Terrorists I don't think we are, but I don't know if we fit the title of "freedom fighter." I don't know, maybe the Iraqi's can answer that...whether they are free and if the cost was worth it.
 

freeryan

I need to clean my screen!
I love being in America especially since my people were here first but it would be nice if America would stay out of other peoples affairs. It may seem heroic, but that's a lame reason for "rescuing" another country.
 
Top