Another Fatal Shooting Near Ferguson

[Will E Worm]

St. Louis Police Officers Shoot and Kill 23-Year-Old Knife-Wielding Man

Reporters are on the scene in St. Louis, Missouri, just miles from Ferguson, where police officers reportedly shot and killed a 23-year-old African-American man wielding a knife. Initial reports indicate that the man entered a store with a knife and refused to leave after police were called. He was shot and killed after he allegedly lunged at police with the knife. In a press conference, police claimed the man was yelling, “Shoot me now, kill me now” before he was shot.

Article


These are the people liberals want to only have weapons.

The police can't shoot someone in the legs or arms?


Two police can't stop one person with a knife, without shooting them?


Expect the protesting and night protests to continue until the police back off.


If not that entire area will be burnt to the ground.

 

[assari]

Perhaps these colored protesters want to burn white people's houses and if they are unable to do it they burn their own homes and the police and the national guard laugh at them.

Source: Dead Kennedys "Riot" song.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Eat a bag of dicks, the both of you. You, assair because you're just fucking stupid. You, will, because you spout off about stuff with no fucking clue. If an armed suspect is within 20 feet of an officer and displays hostile intent, they get shot. It's fair. It's legal. The human brain couldn't react quicker if someone was closer. Look up the Continuum of Force and shut the fuck up.

 

[Will E Worm]

Eat a bag of dicks, the both of you. You, assair because you're just fucking stupid. You, will, because you spout off about stuff with no fucking clue. If an armed suspect is within 20 feet of an officer and displays hostile intent, they get shot. It's fair. It's legal. The human brain couldn't react quicker if someone was closer. Look up the Continuum of Force and shut the fuck up.

NJ Cop to Citizen: “If Obama Doesn’t Follow the Constitution, We Don’t Have to Either” Article


Keep on believing the police care.

When the obviously don't.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_force_continuum

 

[panther]

At least the Chief of Police of this city arrived at the scene quickly after the incident to brief the angry. Of course he was shouted down. Not so in Ferguson. More calm was acheived by his action.

 

[Deepcover]

NJ Cop to Citizen: “If Obama Doesn’t Follow the Constitution, We Don’t Have to Either” Article


Keep on believing the police care.

When the obviously don't.

The police never cared in the first place that's why they are and always will be considered dirt pieces of scum

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

The police never cared in the first place that's why they are and always will be considered dirt pieces of scum

Qualify your remark. See, I consider "people" like you as the worst part of the job because you dehumanize everyone and try to encapsulate them into one category or other without knowing what the fuck you're talking about. You don't know the screening and training they have to go through; the workload that keeps them from their families for 12-16 hours daily; or rules these people have to live by in order to protect your rights under the law. And it's a job. It defines some of them but mostly it's a mark of pride to accomplish something meaningful; namely, keeping anarchy behind the door so decent people can live their lives without having to worry constantly about scumbags like you.

 

[Deepcover]

Qualify your remark. See, I consider "people" like you as the worst part of the job because you dehumanize everyone and try to encapsulate them into one category or other without knowing what the fuck you're talking about. You don't know the screening and training they have to go through; the workload that keeps them from their families for 12-16 hours daily; or rules these people have to live by in order to protect your rights under the law. And it's a job. It defines some of them but mostly it's a mark of pride to accomplish something meaningful; namely, keeping anarchy behind the door so decent people can live their lives without having to worry constantly about scumbags like you.

The police are trouble. Look @ what they caused? And you are saying they did the right thing? You think i'd feel safe if I was near a Police officer in public? Not on your life. They are scumbags. OK Not all police officers are considered scum just some are and the bad ones give the good ones a bad name. You'd think by now in this day and age America would by now learn the lessons of these stories. It doesn't look like America ever will.

 

[Jagger69]

Being a police officer....especially a uniformed patrolman....has got to be one of the most difficult jobs in the world. I know a number of cops on an intimate basis and I can assure you that the overwhelming majority of them are honest, helpful and would avoid conflict at all cost. By the same token, just as it is in any profession, there are a certain percentage of them that are assholes who go looking for trouble any chance they get. I can assure you they are in the minority by a longshot.

Whatever the outcome of the Mike Brown shooting, I feel certain that justice and the truth will be served. If Officer Williams deliberately shot an unarmed teenager as he was attempting to surrender, it will be discovered and he will be appropriately punished. If not and the shooting was justified as a result of the officer fearing for his own well-being, he will be exonerated. Isn't that as it should be? :dunno: Let the justice system work.

 

[RASQ]

The police are trouble. Look @ what they caused? And you are saying they did the right thing? You think i'd feel safe if I was near a Police officer in public? Not on your life. They are scumbags. OK Not all police officers are considered scum just some are and the bad ones give the good ones a bad name. You'd think by now in this day and age America would by now learn the lessons of these stories. It doesn't look like America ever will.

I can sum it for you dipshit. Be a model citizen, don't steal, kill, or break any laws. Plain and fucking simple. But, oh noes, there are people who do break the laws. Those are the ones constantly in jail. I have this moronic friend who sounds just like you, dipshit. He buys pot, drives with pot in his car, doesn't put on seat belt, gets pulled over, goes to jail, gets out, we have to hear him cry about cops and how he hates the cops and he didn't do anything wrong, well fuck asshole, pot is illegal, so is not wearing your seat belt. if you would just have put on your fucking seat belt, drive the speed limit, make sure you're not driving a car with a headlight or tailight out, then maybe the cops wouldn't have stopped you in the first place. i dont have a problem with cops, you know why? cause i've never been in trouble with them! if i was driving through phoenix fucking arizona and the police stopped me cause i looked illegal, guess what asswipe, it wouldn't bother me cause, a) im not illegal, i have all my credentials b) i dont have warrents! so let him do his job and you're off. i bet you anything deepcover is the same exact crying shit just like my friend.

as far as brown, he got what was coming for him. he was a bad egg, probably had never been caught before. thats why he was a bully, nobody ever stood up to him. you think that strong arm robbery was his first? fuck no! he had gotten away with shit before. just this time it costed him his life, so fuck'em. karma got him. as for the cop, i agree what jagger said, let it pan out. if the shooting was justified, fine, if it wasn't, then the cop will be punished. good day, sir!

 

[Deepcover]

I can sum it for you dipshit. Be a model citizen, don't steal, kill, or break any laws. Plain and fucking simple. But, oh noes, there are people who do break the laws. Those are the ones constantly in jail. I have this moronic friend who sounds just like you, dipshit. He buys pot, drives with pot in his car, doesn't put on seat belt, gets pulled over, goes to jail, gets out, we have to hear him cry about cops and how he hates the cops and he didn't do anything wrong, well fuck asshole, pot is illegal, so is not wearing your seat belt. if you would just have put on your fucking seat belt, drive the speed limit, make sure you're not driving a car with a headlight or tailight out, then maybe the cops wouldn't have stopped you in the first place. i dont have a problem with cops, you know why? cause i've never been in trouble with them! if i was driving through phoenix fucking arizona and the police stopped me cause i looked illegal, guess what asswipe, it wouldn't bother me cause, a) im not illegal, i have all my credentials b) i dont have warrents! so let him do his job and you're off. i bet you anything deepcover is the same exact crying shit just like my friend.

as far as brown, he got what was coming for him. he was a bad egg, probably had never been caught before. thats why he was a bully, nobody ever stood up to him. you think that strong arm robbery was his first? fuck no! he had gotten away with shit before. just this time it costed him his life, so fuck'em. karma got him. as for the cop, i agree what jagger said, let it pan out. if the shooting was justified, fine, if it wasn't, then the cop will be punished. good day, sir!

You are delusional. A person without a criminal record can still be stop by the police. You could simply be minding your own self and for no ordinary reason get stopped by an officer who is just looking to start shit. You never know! Now if a situation like that happened to me I wouldn't get into an argument that you so blindingly believe every person of color would automatically get into but after the situation I would feel insulted. Like "why the fuck did he want to search me for? I don't have anything illegal on me. I'm not even wearing anything that looks suspicious. Oh well @least i'll be home in time to catch Seinfeld"

If it wasn't do you believe Wilson should be charged for his actions?

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

http://www.social2.com/st-louis-inc...-by-blow-statement-by-a-federal-law-enforcer/

 

[Mr. Daystar]

I love the way people love to rag on the cops fro shooting criminals...then complain they should use more non-lethal methods...then bitch when they use tazers. the whole while, bitching about how they need to do something about all of the crime...and continually criticizing people, for doing a job they could not only ever do, but likely never qualify to do.

But they'll be the first ones to call the cops, when their lives are in danger, or their stuff gets stolen.

Yeah, some cops are assholes, some like their power to much, some of them should have never been hired...but most of them are hard working men and women, that do a thankless job, under shit conditions, for a bunch of ungrateful shitbags...and they deserve better.

 

[bahodeme]

In this case, this person was mentally unstable. Most police departments (be it financially or because of society feels about mental illness) are not trained to handle the mentally ill. Most of the things the work for mentally stable people (show of force, swarm technique, etc) has the opposite effect on the unstable. Do I think that the police should have a couch and asked how do they feel about there mom, of course not. But some insight into the mentally challenged would help both the officer & the person involved. In my area, there was an incident with a man with Down's Syndrome that was totally mishandled.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

The police can't shoot someone in the legs or arms?

In a fluid moment like that, hitting a small, MOVING target with selective aim is nearly impossible. You might as well ask them to shoot the knife out of a suspect's hand.

Firing on a Suspect Is Lethal Force, No Matter Where You Aim

Although it certainly makes a difference to the suspect where an officer aims and fires his or her service firearm, the legal justification behind lethal force doesn't change. Police are allowed to open fire on a suspect when there is either:

-Imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm; or
-A fleeing felon who poses imminent danger if he or she escapes.

Regardless of whether an officer aims for the body, arms, head, or legs, there must be either of the above elements present before an officer can pull the trigger.

Very Unlikely to Hit Arms and Legs

Part of the problem of asking cops to shoot to wound is the lower statistical likelihood of actually hitting a suspect in the arms or legs. The Omaha, Nebraska, Police Department notes that because armed encounters are rarely with a stationary suspect, expecting officers to shoot a suspect's arms or legs is "not feasible nor is it realistic."

Police officers are trained to fire at the center mass (the torso), which both increases the odds of subduing a deadly threat and decreases the likelihood of hitting innocent bystanders.

Shooting to wound reflects a misapplication of police equipment. "Less-lethal options should be attempted only with tools designed for that purpose," Avery says. "If you deliberately use deadly force to bring people into custody without incapacitating them, you're using the wrong tool for that job. Also if you shoot them in the arm or leg and you destroy muscle tissue, shatter bone or destroy nerve function you have maimed that person for life. Now attorneys can play the argument of 'cruel and unusual punishment' and pursue punitive damages for destroying the capacity of your 'victim' to earn wages and so on. You don't try to just wound people with a gun. Period."

http://www.pfoa.co.uk/110/shooting-to-wound

http://downtrend.com/71superb/stupid-liberal-question-why-do-cops-shoot-to-kill/

 

[georges]

I love the way people love to rag on the cops fro shooting criminals...then complain they should use more non-lethal methods...then bitch when they use tazers. the whole while, bitching about how they need to do something about all of the crime...and continually criticizing people, for doing a job they could not only ever do, but likely never qualify to do.

But they'll be the first ones to call the cops, when their lives are in danger, or their stuff gets stolen.

Yeah, some cops are assholes, some like their power to much, some of them should have never been hired...but most of them are hard working men and women, that do a thankless job, under shit conditions, for a bunch of ungrateful shitbags...and they deserve better.

well said :clap:

 

[MustBeGood]

In this case, this person was mentally unstable. Most police departments (be it financially or because of society feels about mental illness) are not trained to handle the mentally ill. Most of the things the work for mentally stable people (show of force, swarm technique, etc) has the opposite effect on the unstable. Do I think that the police should have a couch and asked how do they feel about there mom, of course not. But some insight into the mentally challenged would help both the officer & the person involved. In my area, there was an incident with a man with Down's Syndrome that was totally mishandled.

Same here where I live recently but this guy was mentally ill.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwau...-at-red-arrow-park-b99260307z1-257512561.html

Cops don't need to shoot to kill when threaten by someone who doesn't have a gun. They take target practice and can stop a threat by shooting at the legs, knees, or shoulders area.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Cops don't need to shoot to kill when threaten by someone who doesn't have a gun. They take target practice and can stop a threat by shooting at the legs, knees, or shoulders area.

Fucking dumbest thing I've read today. Cops aren't Hopalong Cassidy or the Lone Fucking Ranger. If a threat warrants shooting, it warrants shooting until it's no longer a threat. Legs, knees and shoulders are small targets compared to center mass and the risk to bystanders would increase due to a round passing through.

http://downtrend.com/71superb/stupid-liberal-question-why-do-cops-shoot-to-kill/

http://www.pfoa.co.uk/110/shooting-to-wound

Shooting to wound reflects a misapplication of police equipment. "Less-lethal options should be attempted only with tools designed for that purpose," Avery says. "If you deliberately use deadly force to bring people into custody without incapacitating them, you're using the wrong tool for that job. Also if you shoot them in the arm or leg and you destroy muscle tissue, shatter bone or destroy nerve function you have maimed that person for life. Now attorneys can play the argument of 'cruel and unusual punishment' and pursue punitive damages for destroying the capacity of your 'victim' to earn wages and so on. You don't try to just wound people with a gun. Period."

free photo hosting

Thanks, MBG. I've been wanting to post this picture for a while and this dumbass post fits the bill.

 

[MustBeGood]

^^^^^^^^

Whatever and really last retort.

You didn't read the part where I said with someone without a gun.

Not going type swear words but you are just baiting and trolling as that is how you get off on posters you feel are not worthy in your world like telling assari stop posting and making threads.

A loser troll who takes Google images with creative captions to state points.

So keep up your loser forum tactics, and in the future with every pic you want to make up on me, I'll Bee Dat

Later dude and putting you on ignore. Something I should of done from jump street.