Ashely Judd vs. Sarah Palin on aerial hunting issue

[Facial_King]

This isn't (simply) a "who would you fuck?" question. Do you agree with Palin or Judd on this particular issue?

Read more here:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/05/politics/main4777153.shtml

 

[Hypergalaxy]

Ashley Judd and not just because she is hotter

 

[sdj374]

Ashley Judd. Shooting animals from a plane and leaving them to die is just sick. I don't care what their rationale is for doing it.

 

[tartanterrier]

Ashley would get it

 

[Master_Gio]

Ashley Judd and not just because she is hotter

Well said.

 

[pikachar]

You know how hard it is to shoot from a helicopter, or a fixed wing plane?? You'd be amazed... I voted fishing so you know, and Sarah Palin (because she's a better looking Republican, only reason why). But mainly I say watch Bass Master baby!

 

[Ravenholm]

Hanging out of a choppa and capping things is way easier than being on foot. It's quicker [no roads or dirt paths to follow] and not so tiring. The accuracy might not be as high, but who gives a fuck. More animals will be capped on foot and in venhicles by hunters than they ever will be by choppa.

I voted for Sarah Palin. Not because I believe what she says, or that I dont believe what Ashley Crudd says. I just think Sarah is leagues above Judd.

 

[Facetious]

edit

 

[BigHurt35]

Apparently, there is a "scientific" reason for the hunting. I don't know exactly what that "scientific" reasoning is, but I'm sure that there is some validity to it. I don't really care either way. If people were hunting these animals on the ground, nobody would even be talking about this. But, since they're shooting animals from an airplane/helicopter, it's supposed to be a big deal? No, it's the same thing. Stop crying, Hollywood. We see and hear enough of your BS already.

 

[Skyraider22]

palin all the way

 

[banane18021802]

palin makes me cum

 

[Will E Worm]

Some animals have to die to thin their population. Unless you're fine with animals in your front yard and running them over all the time.

Fishing DVDs sound good. I haven't watched a fishing program in awhile.

 

[Torre82]

:uts the cursor over the options::

::thinks about them::

::re-reads all the posts::

::closes this tab on the browser::

 

[D-rock]

I'm one of those people that just doesn't care. As long as they aren't hampering the environment or messing with the ecosystem to throw it out of balance it never bothered me why a person hunts for the most part or how they do it. Whether they are doing it in a sporting way or not or if they are doing it because they get enjoyment out of it or for some other reason like getting food, it's irrelevant to me. Otherwise restricting them is tantamount to enforcing somebody else's sense of morality on them.

 

[Facial_King]

I'm one of those people that just doesn't care. As long as they aren't hampering the environment or messing with the ecosystem to throw it out of balance it never bothered me why a person hunts for the most part or how they do it. Whether they are doing it in a sporting way or not or if they are doing it because they get enjoyment out of it or for some other reason like getting food, it's irrelevant to me. Otherwise restricting them is tantamount to enforcing somebody else's sense of morality on them.

I was following you until you got to "Otherwise restricting them is tantamount to enforcing somebody else's sense of morality on them."

Don't you think our laws are just filled with examples of (en)forcing someone's sense of morality on everyone, including upon those that disagree? Is that necessarily a bad thing? Some might not agree with the minimum age requirements for people to perform in porn vids, but some/someone's sense of morality gets imposed, whether they like it or not, and if they defy it, they're in trouble. In most places you can't just torture an animal on a public street (or at all, for that matter), have sex in a public park, purchase or consume heroin, or drive your kid around with them sitting on the hood of your car. Those who think these things are acceptable are, in effect, having "somebody else's sense of morality" (en)forced upon them...

 

[D-rock]

I was following you until you got to "Otherwise restricting them is tantamount to enforcing somebody else's sense of morality on them."

Don't you think our laws are just filled with examples of (en)forcing someone's sense of morality on everyone, including upon those that disagree? Is that necessarily a bad thing? Some might not agree with the minimum age requirements for people to perform in porn vids, but some/someone's sense of morality gets imposed, whether they like it or not, and if they defy it, they're in trouble. In most places you can't just torture an animal on a public street (or at all, for that matter), have sex in a public park, purchase or consume heroin, or drive your kid around with them sitting on the hood of your car. Those who think these things are acceptable are, in effect, having "somebody else's sense of morality" (en)forced upon them...

I think there is a difference between things that don't harm anybody, don't effect anybody else in any significant way, and don't infringe on anybody else's inherent rights and things that do (as long as your an adult). You shouldn't be allowed to murder somebody as an example, or show pornography out in the public, but that should have as much to do with the fact it's pretty much impossible to do it without infringing on the rights of other people than it does with morality. As far as non-adults go I have no problem with them not getting the same full rights as an adult because they shouldn't. Animals are not people, and in my view shouldn't get any rights at all.

 

[milton waddams]

Animals are not people, and in my view shouldn't get any rights at all.

whenever i hear someone say this, i pray some super duper alien species from another galaxy comes to earth and enslaves, rapes and pillages everyone who holds d-rocks sentiments by using the same logic humans use against non-humans. tell me, when you are on the slab, where will it tickle you?

 

[Torre82]

whenever i hear someone say this, i pray some super duper alien species from another galaxy comes to earth and enslaves, rapes and pillages everyone who holds d-rocks sentiments by using the same logic humans use against non-humans. tell me, when you are on the slab, where will it tickle you?

In my butthole. I've got this nagging hemmorhoid that keeps rupturing... while it's healing I keep having this pleasurable itch but it's not like I can just grab some paper, jam it up my ass and start scratching it during the middle of my shift in full view of the public. So I clench. I sit and wiggle. I try to ignore it but the aliens are tickling my bung and goddamn it I'm not going to stand for it!!!!

::sits down::

::clenches and wiggles:: Itchy fucking asshole... gawd. If I was gay this would be way more useful than it is! I need like.. some anti itch cream or something.

 

[milton waddams]

In my butthole. I've got this nagging hemmorhoid that keeps rupturing... while it's healing I keep having this pleasurable itch but it's not like I can just grab some paper, jam it up my ass and start scratching it during the middle of my shift in full view of the public. So I clench. I sit and wiggle. I try to ignore it but the aliens are tickling my bung and goddamn it I'm not going to stand for it!!!!

::sits down::

::clenches and wiggles:: Itchy fucking asshole... gawd. If I was gay this would be way more useful than it is! I need like.. some anti itch cream or something.

try preparation H or the alan parsons project. i hear they do wonders.

 

[max0rz]

the reality here seems to be that it's humans f*cking with nature as usual.

They're hunting the caribou and moose up there, which leads to an overpopulation of wolves relative to there food supply.
So instead of curtailing hunting for food by humans, they decide to cull the animals instead.