Clever Anti-War Posters

[Ace Boobtoucher]

What leftist hippies fail to realize is that to the common serviceman there is no distinction between protesting the war and hostility towards our troops. I see those bullshit bumper stickers, "Support our troops, end the war!" And I have to say what a load of crap. Support our troops by putting together care packages with batteries, cookies, porn, extra razors and toilet paper. Go out and raise money for disabled veterans or widows and orphans. Do something constructive like writing your congressman or president Nobama and plead your case for ending the war with them. Just leave the troops out of it! They have enough to worry about with IEDs, suicide bombers and illegal combatants from Syria, Iran and Lebanon without having to worry about being stabbed in the back by cocksuckers like Cindy Sheehan or the population of the San Francisco Bay area. Thank them for their service or if you don't have something positive to say, just keep your mouths shut. Because if their is any Karmic retribution to be had, one day you may find yourself on the wrong end of an ass kicking.

 

[Facetious]

Ah Ha ! Now I know what Baill Inerorororoa's Avatar is all about

*Scroll down

:1orglaugh

 

[jamrak]

War itself is bad, but sometimes war is the only way to peace.

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Ah Ha ! Now I know what Baill Inerorororoa's Avatar is all about

*Scroll down

:1orglaugh

Yeah, that's pretty funny. But to get to it you have to wade through a bunch of leftist propaganda.

 

[curiousWAN]

here is my proposition; when you decide to kill some terrorist or dictator in a certain country, fucking do it and then immediately leave. people doesn't hate usa because you kill terrorists but because when you invade somewhere you are there to stay. you never leave completely. thats fucking all about it.

i post that pic which says shoot the motherfucker because thats what i believe. i dont post that thinking, thats what usa does though. i even can say, if motherfucker doesnt living in somewhere strategic or with oil, you will not stir a finger.

 

[calpoon]

...

haha. That reminds me of that Simpsons episode where Apu is hanging out with Paul McCartney and they are talking about people with different viewpoints.

Apu: It's like that song of yours Paul, "Live and let live."

Paul: Actually, it was called "Live and let die."

Apu: Whatever. It had a catchy beat.

 

[curiousWAN]

fact; there are people who just kills.

then it's just impossible to "live and let live"

it can be "live and let die" (you are shooting the motherfucker)

or "live and let kill" (you are not shooting the motherfucker so he keeps killing)

easy, right?

 

[calpoon]

on the subject of warfare, the problem is that people make it too simplistic and black and white. they always boil it down to one group of peaceful innocent people being attacked by a bunch of bloodthirstay assholes bent on slaughter...

well, the thing is that almost never happens. It's usually because the peaceful people used to be the assholes that attacked the other peaceful people that are now the assholes that are attacking them, and vice versa for 2 thousand years, give or take a century or two here and there when they were at war with someone else.

I don't start shit with people, but if you want to fuck with me, then fuck you. that's the way I look at it.

But let's get serious here. When it comes to the US the only time we have ever been invaded by a foreign national army was in 1812. So I have a hard time justifying the wars we've fought as a matter of self-preservation.

You say what about WWII? Well maybe. That is the one case where it might be ok to excuse the neccesity of defeating Germany and Japan... but even still there is a lot of shit that was going on behind the scenes and moral gray areas if you look into it.

Most of the time the excuse of taking out the fucker before he could take you out first doesn't really hold up.

What about 9/11? That was done by an international terrorist group. I'm all for fidning al queda bases and bombing them to hell whever they are and then getting the fuck out of there. But the Taliban in Afghanistan, as fucked up as they are, they aren't really the ones responsible for that other than in a really flimsy way. I talked about that in the Osama FBI thread. There is only a few people that were really involved with it and most of the people are only guilty by association and didn't even know about it until afterwards. Saddam, as fucked up as he was, had nothing to do with it at all.

That's the other thing like 99.999% of all the people involved in a war have nothing to do with the reasons that it's being fought in the first place.

oh yeah, and let's talk about civilian casualties, cuz that shit happens all the time. yeah, cool, we took out the bad guys.. and only had to kill a million kids that happened to be in the way in the process. That doesn't jive too well for me.

 

[curiousWAN]

oh yeah, and let's talk about civilian casualties, cuz that shit happens all the time. yeah, cool, we took out the bad guys.. and only had to kill a million kids that happened to be in the way in the process. That doesn't jive too well for me.

how long it took for you to take down saddam and what the heck are you doing still there?

if the process really going to cost a million kids then sit tight in your country. that's it.

both you and me know it isn't about bringing democracy and wiping the baddies off.

 

[calpoon]

how long it took for you to take down saddam and what the heck are you doing still there?

naw, I've never met the guy. You must have me confused with someone else.

 

[curiousWAN]

Homer: Be quiet, I can't hear myself think
Everyone: <silence>
Homer: <Thinks> Yum yum yum yum

 

[calpoon]

I guess the plan is to stay there until no one hates America anymore.

According to John Mccain that will be in about a thousand years.

 

[bustybbwlover]

nah...just a hundred years sorry if any of these are repeats
iraq turning to iran
http://kioto.blogsome.com/images/IraqIranmedium.jpg
with us or with the terrorists
http://www.beatrice.com/youjpg.jpg
war on war
http://images.todaystmj4.com/images/antiwar_poster.bmp
war is terrorism
http://www.environment.org.uk/activist/images/war.jpg
quote from jean-paul sartre as a bumper sticker about how the rich wage war and the poor die
http://rlv.zcache.com/when_the_rich...umper_sticker-p128439793991736294trl0_400.jpg

 

[poolestromthor]

Look, it is very easy to be against the war in Iraq and still be willing to support the troops there. I don't think we should cut funding to the troops; I think we should have a well-planned course for getting the fuck out of there, all the while making sure the troops there are as well equipped as possible.

I'm a Libertarian. I am not a "leftist hippie". In fact, I wager I'm more conservative than many of you hawks posting in this thread. That includes my belief that we had no credible reason to go to Iraq. Afghanistan, on the other hand, was justified. We needed to go there, capture Osama bin Laden and his cronies, turn them over to the International Court and then GTFO. We couldn't do that and still somehow expected to go to Iraq, get Saddam Hussein and his cronies and then leave. Lesson learned x2.

We have (and have had for years) our own problems here at home that needed to be dealt with rather than spending billions of dollars a year on a war that we didn't even execute well. By that, I mean that we're still there. Have you stopped to think exactly how long ago we started this invasion? And we're still somehow not done? They have their own government, their own military, let them be about their own business and let's get back to ours.

Problems: dependence on oil and other polluting sources of energy, the slow and deliberate destruction of our civil liberties at the hands of a growing government headed by someone who claims to be against big government (Patriot Fucking Act), the economy (which really only came to a head recently, but was rooted in problems years old). The list goes on. Look at just about any current problem, and it's something that should have been dealt with long ago except for a single-minded, incompetent President.

Being against the war in Iraq is NOT the same as being against the troops, and it does not require one to be a tree-hugger. It takes not believing out of fear something you're told by someone who's also afraid. It takes seriously understanding your duty as an American citizen, and realizing that this is NOT right: 4000 soldiers dead and counting, and "Mission Accomplished" was declared years ago.

 

[skechers]

Look, it is very easy to be against the war in Iraq and still be willing to support the troops there. I don't think we should cut funding to the troops; I think we should have a well-planned course for getting the fuck out of there, all the while making sure the troops there are as well equipped as possible.

I'm a Libertarian. I am not a "leftist hippie". In fact, I wager I'm more conservative than many of you hawks posting in this thread. That includes my belief that we had no credible reason to go to Iraq. Afghanistan, on the other hand, was justified. We needed to go there, capture Osama bin Laden and his cronies, turn them over to the International Court and then GTFO. We couldn't do that and still somehow expected to go to Iraq, get Saddam Hussein and his cronies and then leave. Lesson learned x2.

We have (and have had for years) our own problems here at home that needed to be dealt with rather than spending billions of dollars a year on a war that we didn't even execute well. By that, I mean that we're still there. Have you stopped to think exactly how long ago we started this invasion? And we're still somehow not done? They have their own government, their own military, let them be about their own business and let's get back to ours.

Problems: dependence on oil and other polluting sources of energy, the slow and deliberate destruction of our civil liberties at the hands of a growing government headed by someone who claims to be against big government (Patriot Fucking Act), the economy (which really only came to a head recently, but was rooted in problems years old). The list goes on. Look at just about any current problem, and it's something that should have been dealt with long ago except for a single-minded, incompetent President.

Being against the war in Iraq is NOT the same as being against the troops, and it does not require one to be a tree-hugger. It takes not believing out of fear something you're told by someone who's also afraid. It takes seriously understanding your duty as an American citizen, and realizing that this is NOT right: 4000 soldiers dead and counting, and "Mission Accomplished" was declared years ago.

I was going to post something along these lines, but then I got to the end of the thread, and realized you said it better than I could have.

Hats off to you, friend.


Watch those "leftist" "right-wing" "hippie" "liberal" "conservative" tags, folks. labels are the devil. They shut books.

 

[georges]

I am going to have some words in that thread. Both of my uncles were in Vietnam, my cousins did the first and second gulf wars, so you will easily understand why I side with pro war people. The war isn't a nice thing but sometimes it is an unavoidable necessity to get rid of threats that can endanger some areas. The concept of preemptive strategy is taking measures to avoid the worse to come and it is not by having a polite and diplomatic talk that you will solve a crisis of a rogue country invading a democracy. I also believe in the right of full retaliation with bigger means of attack against a country in case of surprise attack. Being passive and trying failed and fucked up strategies à la clinton or anykind of liberal peaceful strategy doesn't work especially with dictatures or rogue regimes.If you give a hand to a dictator, he will take you your arm. Preemptive strategy and preemptive thinking are much better than passive or/and laxist thinking used by leftist/liberal governements. I do remember one thing very clear when BUSH delcared war on terror, it was that many people in my class called him a devil and insulted America of all names, in my mind I was thinking and asked myself some serious questions: "Is that what those bunch of fucking ignorant fuckers are thinking? I just hope that they will face a situation that they will be unable to deal with and suffer as much as they can. I guess gratefulness is not a part of some people's morals. What a bunch of ungrateful pigs." A day later, I decided to make a presentation in my English class about the reasons why America entered in war. I tried to be neutral and not show my too right wing side during that presentation and it worked well. One guy came to me after the course and asked me: "Are you pro Bush?". I grabbed him by the collar and asked him :"Are you a fucking antiamerican radical islamic zealot terrorist motherfucker? If no, then don't come up to my face like that ever again and gtfo". Remember people who were against Vietnam, I don't think we need to portrait them, the people against Iraq and Afghanistan are more or less the same people.
People who think daddy O does a great job have everything wrong as usual.

 

[skechers]

^It's important for you to realize, that I am not criticizing your uncles for being soldiers, and serving in the military. But... What exactly did we accomplish in Vietnam?

We cannot police the world.

 

[georges]

^It's important for you to realize, that I am not criticizing your uncles for being soldiers, and serving in the military. But... What exactly did we accomplish in Vietnam?

We cannot police the world.

Yes, we can't police the world but we can't let rogue regimes spread all over strategic areas and threaten strategic, economic and cultural interests and main points of the USA and its allies.

 

[skechers]

Yeah. But we train them first, right? Many of these regimes.


Gotta pick a winner. It's a great set up we got. And when they get big in their britches, and come after us with the weopons, and the training that we provided them, we have a war.

It was great when war stimulated the economy, rather than run it into the ground. But really... What are we doing now? Who's running this show? It's basically a hapless seige, on many a different ground, without the necessary resourses- or recourses for that matter. We're running short on stamina, on support and on ideas.

And our "enemy" is used to war. They've been doing it alot longer.

This is the thrilla in manilla. Except, instead of just one Ali, we're looking at three... four... We ARE trying to run the show, this time around. But how long can we, before we simply CAN'T anymore. And then, what do we do? Where will we be?


We think we're the world power? Nu uh. Give China another five years or so.

 

[Friday on my mind]

^It's important for you to realize, that I am not criticizing your uncles for being soldiers, and serving in the military. But... What exactly did we accomplish in Vietnam?

We cannot police the world.

Since your question on vietnam went unanswered I will give you one.We accomplished getting over 50,000 americans killed and who knows how many vietnamease,probably over a million.Then we left defeated,as it should have been since we had no buisness being there.

Some people knew better even at the time.

Muhammad Ali and the Vietnam War

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUk5LRvzjmw