Hoooollyy fucking rotting rapist corpses on a river of mixed aids-infected diarrhea and jizz... You can't be serious that you have actually reviewed a site and let it be here for this long that directly and explicitly mentions "child abuse" directly in its scene descriptions (in the past tense, of course, if this would actually be it then... it's obvious what would have happened). It's not like that's the only illegal stuff though, there's plenty of baiting and luring in for the people who enjoy sprinkles of references to serial killings and corpses stored in freezers in the mix as well.
This is the worst possible site review you could ever have possibly done without going and reviewing a site that really has actual pedophilia. Those descriptions on the site make it seem like this site aims for and wants to lure in people who want to think that the women were raped as children, now allowed and only good only to be further destroyed by any kind of further events of sexual disaster that they might encounter! Those descriptions scream misogyny in the most absolute illegal form of the extreme. It's irrelevant whether the actual fucking that is shown on the site is legal, the mentions of direct child abuse there on the site are far beyond acceptable in any sense or interpretation of free speech or fantasy language on a porn site. This is only one example of that, of course, I wonder how much of it is mentioned actually in there. Probably in most of the descriptions, it's not like they're pulling punches here.
I just discovered this some time ago and I'm now seething with such anger that it's extremely difficult for me to even write about this. I already posted a thread about this to the talk section. Here:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?684539
This review has been here since 2006 and writers of the review seem to have been extremely well aware how this site advertised itself and what sort of attitude it had. That becomes absolutely, abundantly clear from the review and screenshots. Has this gotten through in your reviews by some oversight? Who requested this site to be reviewed? It's not like anyone can claim that "oh, we didn't know that it went into the illegal realm of the extreme in terms of descriptions, it must have been hidden in some undiscovered parts of the site during review", it's right there and extremely clearly so and seems to have been for a long, long time.
Another serious part of this is that if that tracking link indeed works, everyone who has actually signed in and bought a membership to the site through clicking it has resulted in you getting money from the signup. Everyone who has signed in there must have gotten an extremely clear picture that the site uses descriptions referring to child abuse (again, whether it is real or not) and STILL have signed in there, probably because of exactly that. It is used in a context where it is clearly meant to further "intensify the fantasy" so to speak in terms of degradation and dehumanization and that's indeed going as fucking far as it can be in the most illegal extreme possible sort of the extreme. Anyone in their right mind would have left the notion of going to the site after this. At least that's what I thought when I first saw this.
How does it feel to have profited from every signup from a site that uses terms relating to child abuse to lure in customers? Where was your zero-tolerance policy towards pedophilia when this review was written? Who wrote it? Who suggested it and approved it to be posted here? Zero-tolerance towards pedophilia should most absolutely and thoroughly cover every-fucking-possible-sort-of-thing on any site that you write reviews for, including any and all descriptions that sites use to advertise themselves, no matter if it is typical fantasy bullshit or not. In this case it is really IN THE FACE, that is really fucking certain and doesn't leave any kind of interpretation about whether that is included to be "enhancing" the fantasy act of dehumanizing these women.
Of all the sites that I have found during my time on freeones, never have I seen a better example of something that gives an actual reason for the porn haters to think that porn has to be the absolutely worst sort of dehumanizing shit there possibly is. I hate that it exists and is possible to provide ammo for that crowd of retards. I didn't think that your reviews would ever have allowed for even the slightest mention of this. That's the worst. During my entire time on the internet, I have never seen actual child abuse pictures, nor have any of the porn forums or sites has it been encountered in this fashion... an actual official site review instead of some degenerate or troll stirring up shit on the forum. That's what is really making me so angry. I know that there have been posters who have been pedophiles and gotten banned for it, that's not especially new or news or anything at all, that's run-of-the-mill -stuff that inevitably happens every once in a while on adult forums everywhere, but this is different:
this is an official approved long-standing FreeOnes review with a tracking link that brings in money from people who have actually signed up to this "crack whore" site.
tl:dr: This site glorifies and directly makes a fetish of notions of past child abuse having happened in the scene descriptions. This shouldn't have been even remotely acceptable.
