-
Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!
Dirtiest, Rottenest Motherfucker Who Ever Lived
- Thread starter Jagger69
- Start date
pussypoppa
Pussy, pussy, where are you?
George Bush
Member2019
1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
This is really sad ...
Stalin takes the cake over Hitler. It's sad that "genocide" is only reported when you lose a war. Really sad.
In fact, Stalin is yet just another perfect example of the US often siding with "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and picking a "friend" that is not better, and often far worse! Had the Soviets fallen to Germany, we might be talking far more negative about Stalin than Hitler, even though no one would argue in favor of Hilter -- just like they don't Stalin.
Again, I'm sorry, Stalin bests Hitler.
As far as those who said Bush is the worst currently, I think you could think of several dozens far worse. The man might be making mistakes left and right, and those have caused the death of many people -- but there are many nations who could have avoided much of it. Let alone we should look at some leaders out there that are causing hundreds of thousands of people to die per year! Sorry, Iraq doesn't compare.
Stalin takes the cake over Hitler. It's sad that "genocide" is only reported when you lose a war. Really sad.
In fact, Stalin is yet just another perfect example of the US often siding with "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and picking a "friend" that is not better, and often far worse! Had the Soviets fallen to Germany, we might be talking far more negative about Stalin than Hitler, even though no one would argue in favor of Hilter -- just like they don't Stalin.
Again, I'm sorry, Stalin bests Hitler.
As far as those who said Bush is the worst currently, I think you could think of several dozens far worse. The man might be making mistakes left and right, and those have caused the death of many people -- but there are many nations who could have avoided much of it. Let alone we should look at some leaders out there that are causing hundreds of thousands of people to die per year! Sorry, Iraq doesn't compare.
RogueWolf
Be careful what you wish for, it might come true!
I'm sorry...but GEORGE BUSH??? Please...that's insulting to all the victims of the Holocaust, Stalin's purge, the Khmer Rouge, and any of the other despotic regimes that have been mentioned.
Like Prof said, Bush may have made some mistakes...but intentionally evil...I don't think so. Purposeful genocide...not even close. Blatantly open about murdering an entire race...no. Get real people. We get it...you hate George Bush. But putting his name next to any of the others in this list is laughable.
Hitler by far in my mind. If for no other reason than he was just so open about his hatred and his ultimate goal. Sure...Stalin or Mao may have killed more...but it was much quieter. Hilter was open and blatant about his thoughts and plans.
Like Prof said, Bush may have made some mistakes...but intentionally evil...I don't think so. Purposeful genocide...not even close. Blatantly open about murdering an entire race...no. Get real people. We get it...you hate George Bush. But putting his name next to any of the others in this list is laughable.
Hitler by far in my mind. If for no other reason than he was just so open about his hatred and his ultimate goal. Sure...Stalin or Mao may have killed more...but it was much quieter. Hilter was open and blatant about his thoughts and plans.
DrMotorcity
Don Trump calls me Pornography Man
How about...
Jefferson Davis
Jagger69
Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
4G63 said:
There's no "ranking" going on here....I asked who was the worst person to walk the face of the earth. It's a discussion of that question....period. No one is considering their despicable acts as "accomplishments" either. Sorry 4G63 but no "holier than thou" attitude is justified by the nature of this topic.
gaunameister
If this message appears I will send Freeones $100
All Bush Family, Grampa Bush gave money for Hitler´s cause.
Johan
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Nero (Roman emperor), the biggest bastard who ever lived :
-Adopted, he married the father of his adoptive father (and then cheated her with on of his conselor and his wife.
-Get divorced, forced his conselor to divorce and then mary his wife
-Murdered his own mother
-Sentenced of his familly to the dath penalty
-Set Rome on fire and then accused the christian, this way his could make some laws to chase and persecute christians.
-Murdered his 2nd wife
A true mental as emperor of one of the biggest empire who was ever built.
-Adopted, he married the father of his adoptive father (and then cheated her with on of his conselor and his wife.
-Get divorced, forced his conselor to divorce and then mary his wife
-Murdered his own mother
-Sentenced of his familly to the dath penalty
-Set Rome on fire and then accused the christian, this way his could make some laws to chase and persecute christians.
-Murdered his 2nd wife
A true mental as emperor of one of the biggest empire who was ever built.
Last edited:
Member2019
1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
There are CURRENT leaders responsible for 100,000+ genocides ...
And for those that want to try to blame the US for many of those conflicts, I would quickly point out it wasn't "American Imperalism" that began the "dislike" between people centuries ago ... but European Imperlism that was often the root cause. As I've said before, I'll take our "American Imperalism" against any and all "European Imperalism" any day -- especially since "European Imperialism" has been active the latter half of the 20th century.
"American Imperialism" has never taken people and intentionally separted them to keep them "under control." "American Imperialism" may be "arrogant, freedom is the only way" at its base -- but it has always taught people that all peoples in a nation are equal and no different than one another. Even when we had "colonies" of our own (and Americans shouldn't believe otherwise, we did, even if we were "late to the party") -- the difference is night'n day.
I was talking in comparison to many CURRENT leaders! There are literally dozens of individual leaders around the world that have been responsible for at least 100,000 deaths on their own, each!RogueWolf said:
And for those that want to try to blame the US for many of those conflicts, I would quickly point out it wasn't "American Imperalism" that began the "dislike" between people centuries ago ... but European Imperlism that was often the root cause. As I've said before, I'll take our "American Imperalism" against any and all "European Imperalism" any day -- especially since "European Imperialism" has been active the latter half of the 20th century.
"American Imperialism" has never taken people and intentionally separted them to keep them "under control." "American Imperialism" may be "arrogant, freedom is the only way" at its base -- but it has always taught people that all peoples in a nation are equal and no different than one another. Even when we had "colonies" of our own (and Americans shouldn't believe otherwise, we did, even if we were "late to the party") -- the difference is night'n day.
Member2019
1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
I should point out that in his first 6 years of his adminstration, more people "indirectly died" during the Clinton administration than have under W. The Clinton administration blocked several UN resolutions to prevent geocide.
Furthermore, there were still thousands of Iraqis dead due to Clinton's actions against Iraq too. I mean, do I need to point out the "massive air strike" in 1998 that virtually hit nothing targetted but only caused civilian casulties?
As several people have pointed out in many threads, too many people here are in their 20s. They are wholly ignorant of the events of the early-to-mid '90s -- they didn't hear much about the Clinton (among earlier) administrations.
Furthermore, there were still thousands of Iraqis dead due to Clinton's actions against Iraq too. I mean, do I need to point out the "massive air strike" in 1998 that virtually hit nothing targetted but only caused civilian casulties?
As several people have pointed out in many threads, too many people here are in their 20s. They are wholly ignorant of the events of the early-to-mid '90s -- they didn't hear much about the Clinton (among earlier) administrations.
Member2019
1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Why is it only Bush? Do you guys remember Clinton at all?
After Somalia, Clinton just liked to bomb from a distance. I can't believe people don't remember that about Clinton. He was often demonized for it too.
23 UN resolutions, 42 coalition partners, etc...
I think you're being influenced by the media.
Especially since W.'s justification was 100% the same that Clinton used.
W. has given far more than Clinton to relief efforts in Africa. So if you want to continue to "unilaterally" bash W., you've gotta include Clinton too.
But no one is listening to Electrical Engineers. They are saying, "oh, go invest some 'renewable energies' or 'why aren't we building solar panels?'" Again, one word, ignorance!
Clinton signed it, the Senate under Clinton shot it down 0-98!!!
If you want to talk about the "demise" of the world -- you need to get a real treaty that addresses more than Kyoto. That's what the US and various Asia-Pacific nations are doing -- while Europe sits there and sulks becuase the US and various Asia-Pacific nations want to include other environmental issues in it!
If you hate Capitalism, you hate the US. And I'm fine with that.
And it was different under Clinton? Com'mon! Clinton fired far more cruise missiles into Iraq than W.! The only reason W. gets a lot of TV media heat is because he put US soldiers on the ground, so we're part of the casulties.********** said:
After Somalia, Clinton just liked to bomb from a distance. I can't believe people don't remember that about Clinton. He was often demonized for it too.
Again, was Clinton any different? He often struck Iraq without UN approval! And how about Bosnia? He went in without a UN resolution there too (it finally came later)!********** said:
23 UN resolutions, 42 coalition partners, etc...
I think you're being influenced by the media.
Especially since W.'s justification was 100% the same that Clinton used.
Oh give me a break!********** said:
Umm, people can't get them here either. At the same time, where is 98% of the drug research going on and funded by?********** said:
W. has given far more than Clinton to relief efforts in Africa. So if you want to continue to "unilaterally" bash W., you've gotta include Clinton too.
********** said:
Agreed. And the environmental policy of the US -- the popular ignorance of its people -- is the problem. If the US would attack its power grid, like France and Japan have done, like how the UK is doing -- we could address 90% of our pollution output and energy dependency issues.********** said:
But no one is listening to Electrical Engineers. They are saying, "oh, go invest some 'renewable energies' or 'why aren't we building solar panels?'" Again, one word, ignorance!
We never joined the Kyoto Treaty!********** said:(g) withdrawing from the Kyoto treaty, potentially contributing to the demise of us all
Clinton signed it, the Senate under Clinton shot it down 0-98!!!
If you want to talk about the "demise" of the world -- you need to get a real treaty that addresses more than Kyoto. That's what the US and various Asia-Pacific nations are doing -- while Europe sits there and sulks becuase the US and various Asia-Pacific nations want to include other environmental issues in it!
Capitalism is the foundation of the US. Yes, I'm sorry we're that way, and it might explain why we hold ourselves to a higher standard than others do of themselves.********** said:
If you hate Capitalism, you hate the US. And I'm fine with that.
sammy402002
I'm a porn expert.
How is that?--He was not a World leader.He just led a nation during a Civil War.Being the leader of the defeated Confederate States of America would hardly put him in the category of these ANIMALS that are listed and being discussed.And he certainly was not a mass murderer.DrMotorcity said:
DrMotorcity
Don Trump calls me Pornography Man
sammy402002 said:
I have this peculiar, and strange little habit when ever I make a reply in a thread: I always read the title of it first before making my reply.
By the way, did Jeffrey Dahmer serve one term or to as prime minister of Lower Southeast Glockenspielia? Or wasn't it that his running-mate, Charles Manson, resigned from the party and sucessfully defeated the incumbent, while setting the political stage for years to come by spear-heading a powerfuly party block that would bring to supreme power the likes of Ted Bundy, Dennis Rader, and of course, the ubiquitous Sam Other(?!)
You tell me.
Similar threads
