• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

Dirtiest, Rottenest Motherfucker Who Ever Lived

Who is the worst individual to ever walk the Earth?

  • Adolf Hitler

    Votes: 69 58.0%
  • Josef Stalin

    Votes: 15 12.6%
  • Pol Pot

    Votes: 6 5.0%
  • Osama bin Laden

    Votes: 3 2.5%
  • Jeffrey Dahmer

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • Charlie Manson

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Andrei Chikatillo

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • Ted Bundy

    Votes: 2 1.7%
  • Dennis Rader (B.T.K. Killer)

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Other (explain)

    Votes: 18 15.1%

  • Total voters
    119

4G63

Closed Account
Jagger69 said:
There's no "ranking" going on here....

It's a poll. But no ranking?

I'm sure the Cambodians, the Jews, the Russians, and all the other victims, need to know who's oppressor was the "worst". Mass-murderers are all equal in their evil, and their names, like them, should die. Their atrocities will never be forgotten, I don't see the need to bring up the worst criminals and their crimes.

My Mother-in-law is from the killing-fields, and it would take a cold-hearted SOB to ask her about Pol Pot. I find this all very offensive, because it's offensive.

But respond with how I'm preaching and how you have every right to ask who's a better genocidal maniac. At least 10 million people died from the men on your list, I think they deserve the respect of not being ranked. And I feel that this is a ranking, because you can view the results!
 

sammy402002

I'm a porn expert.
DrMotorcity said:
I have this peculiar, and strange little habit when ever I make a reply in a thread: I always read the title of it first before making my reply.

By the way, did Jeffrey Dahmer serve one term or to as prime minister of Lower Southeast Glockenspielia? Or wasn't it that his running-mate, Charles Manson, resigned from the party and sucessfully defeated the incumbent, while setting the political stage for years to come by spear-heading a powerfuly party block that would bring to supreme power the likes of Ted Bundy, Dennis Rader, and of course, the ubiquitous Sam Other(?!)

You tell me.
Your sarcasm is pretty funny.That is why I included the mass murderers.My reference,Sir,was to Stalin and Hitler.I may not have specified or broken them into categories to your liking.My point was,Sir,that I was wondering how You could ever put Jefferson Davis into a category of Evil such as that of Hitler or Stalin,who both murdered millions of innocent people.I was merely curious about that.Your insulting sarcasm is quite humorous,though.Thank You for the reply.I did read the TITLE of the thread,and that is why I found Your response quite unusual.I still find it quite unusual.
 

DrMotorcity

Don Trump calls me Pornography Man
sammy402002 said:
Your sarcasm is pretty funny.That is why I included the mass murderers.My reference,Sir,was to Stalin and Hitler.I may not have specified or broken them into categories to your liking.My point was,Sir,that I was wondering how You could ever put Jefferson Davis into a category of Evil such as that of Hitler or Stalin,who both murdered millions of innocent people.I was merely curious about that.Your insulting sarcasm is quite humorous,though.Thank You for the reply.I did read the TITLE of the thread,and that is why I found Your response quite unusual.I still find it quite unusual.

Yeah, some would say you talked your way out of this one, but I won't.

As far as "J.D." having killed less than the almighty "one million" mark? I'm sure that to his dying day he regretted having failed to attain such milestone.

However, record keeping wasn't what it was in the twentieth or twenty-first century now was it? "Kids," ol' Jeff may say derisively when encountering those "newbies" named Adolf, Iosif, Pol, Sadddam, et. al...

Another by-the-way here: I suppose that from your vantage, I am a well-qualified candidate for the dubious honor for which this thread had been composed to determine.

DrMotorcity
 

sammy402002

I'm a porn expert.
DrMotorcity said:
Yeah, some would say you talked your way out of this one, but I won't.

As far as "J.D." having killed less than the almighty "one million" mark? I'm sure that to his dying day he regretted having failed to attain such milestone.

However, record keeping wasn't what it was in the twentieth or twenty-first century now was it? "Kids," ol' Jeff may say derisively when encountering those "newbies" named Adolf, Iosif, Pol, Sadddam, et. al...

Another by-the-way here: I suppose that from your vantage, I am a well-qualified candidate for the dubious honor for which this thread had been composed to determine.

DrMotorcity
My by-the-way Dr.Motorcity is that You assume I take this that seriously.My "vantage" is that You and I disagree in a debate,and nothing more.I hardly have the opinion that You would be a candidate for such a "dubious honor".I certainly have no animosity towards someone who's opinion I disagree with.I respect Your opinion and enjoy the debates on this board.I have enjoyed ours today,although I have to admit that I was not a big fan of Your sarcastic rant from the earlier post.But,all in all,I like to take it lightly.Nothing personal and no grudges from Me.I hope You feel the same.-I am happy to discuss such matters anytime to exercise the ol' brain in a friendly manner.--Uh Oh.--gotta run..CNN says Richmond is burning.-That damn Jeff Davis!-(sorry,My attempt at sarcasm).I could not resist.Seriously,I enjoyed the exchange of opinions.Peace to You.Sincerely,Sam
 

Member2019

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
The US has gone from the capitalist to facist economic model ...

********** said:
I hate capitalism,
So you hate the foundation of the US economy from the late 1800s to the late 1900s. Understandably, there were some very bad times for workers in the late 1800s to early 1900s. And then we had the various socialist movements that did great things for our nation -- people caring for people.

Unfortunately, people started mandating socialist concepts, instead of letting people individually choose to work together. And that's where you ran into the problem of people differing, whose ever idea was more popular was adopted and then forced on the others. And that's why communism failed.

********** said:
and love the U.S. (in general). You can't tell me what I love or hate, and you certainly can't define what the U.S. means.
The US has moved from capitalism to a facist economic model. It has become a country of 2/3rds entitlements and 1/3rd military-based R&D since JFK on-ward. That is not sustainable.

********** said:
To me, the U.S. means freedom and equality, liberty and open doors to all, even if actuality doesn't mirror ideology. I fight for those ideologies, because that is what I always believed America to be, and that is what I think it should be and someday will be. America has the foundations to be that, in my opinion.
Freedom and equality in access, not entitlement! You can't seem to grasp that concept. The major difference between the US and USSR was that the US never attempted to guarantee fair, the US only guaranteed free! That includes the free will to fuck up and fall straight on your face. But it also meant the ability to pick yourself up and try again.

People who bitch about their job should try running their own business. You don't have to have money to do so. You don't even have to have credit to do so. But it's damn hard! 90% of US businesses are by people who do NOT have money, but they work hard with a belief that they can "do it better." If you don't like things, change it by forming your own company! The government has never been the answer!

Especially when it comes to increased regulation. The so-called "stop the big businesses" attitude by increasing regulation only makes it worse! It gives big business more ways to lobby the government -- especially the federal. If you're going to increase government -- do it at the state or local level, not 1 "clearing house for all lobbyists!" We don't need more government regulation, we need less -- especially because more often hurts smaller businesses than large!

********** said:
I'm tired of people telling me I hate the U.S. I don't hate any nation. Hating an ism doesn't make you hate a country that follows that ism. Not all Americans are capitalists. I don't hate the U.S. I should really learn to ignore your posts, because they almost always feature either insults (you know jack shit about history you ignorant foooool etc etc) or provocative labelling statements that are unfair and provocative (how can an IRANIAN say such a thing, you obviously hate America etc etc etc).
Because you're a hypocrite! You complain about Americans not solving the "Jewish problem" after WWII, yet I didn't see "Iran" exactly "solving the problem" either! Dude, we welcomed as many of the Jewish faith that wanted to come into the US after WWII! Your views are so slanted, so tainted, you can't even see how much of a hypocrite it makes you look like -- especially when you look at the Iranian state and its policies!

********** said:
Damn. I've seen more of this country than you have, I promise you, and I loved it all.
Bullshit. I travel all over the US dude. The majority of people I work with are immigrants! Get off it. You don't know America at all!

The #1 difference between you and I is that I do not try to speak for Americans! You, on the other hand, have said what America "should be," who's votes "should not count" (e.g., the midwest), etc... I believe in freedom and equality when it comes to access and opportunity -- not when it comes to fairness and entitlements!
 

Christmas_Ape

Freeones T-shirt Winner
Hitler is a jerk. Mussolini bit his weenie. Now it doesn't work.

P.S.
He only had one testicle.

Believe it, or not.
 

Member2019

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Please read up on post-WWII European actions

********** said:
And seriously, I am very serious, if you ever, ever respond to me again, you had better check your post before you click send to make sure there are no personal insults because I have never insulted you and I am done being name-called and told I'm an ignorant fool etc. I'm done. No more insults. :(
You are an ignorant fool because you constantly make assumptions! You obviously don't know the first thing about the post-WWII environment. All I ask is that you read up on what you are talking about and stop making assumptions.

Hell, there are still people blaming the US for Vietnam. We didn't create it, we were just stupid enough to think we could show up and the Vietnamese wouldn't think we weren't just more French Imperialists! If we're guilty of anything, it's trying to constantly "clean up" the problems created by European nations (and often only making them worse)!

You bitch about America "controlling too much," yet turn around and bitch about America "not controlling enough." You contradict yourself. Furthermore, you don't seem very objective when you state what America should do when you constantly defend Iran who definitely does not have any similar tolerance!

Quit blaming the US for every God Damn thing that happens. Even the Arab league blames the terrorist organizations for this one!
 

Member2019

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Do you guys even know Stalin?

Perfect said:
No competion... the bastard Adolf Hitler
iamforever said:
nobody can argue this. it is hitler. i wish he was alive today. but no, the fuck blew his own head off.
Yes competition! Yes argument!

The difference between Hilter and Stalin is that Stalin committed mass murder and genocide before, during and after WWII. Hitler reserved most of it for the war. Stalin just "won a war" on the side of the US -- but everyone forgets Stalin helped start it and was quite involved in the genocide that Hitler is often solely blamed for!

Hitler and Stalin massacred hundreds of thousands of Poles and several neighboring people in 1939-1940 and no one seems to remember the Soviet incursions into Scandinavia and other countries. And to a point far worse than Hitler and his Nazi party, Stalin rose to power in the Communist party and maintained power by killing off his critics, to the point that Lenin was at odds with him.

But unlike Hitler, Stalin massacred countless mindshare in his own country's infrastructure, a fact that bit him in the ass when it came to WWII. At least Hitler wasn't stupid enough from that infrastructure aspect. In 1945, the USSR started shelling installations in German and Berlin under US and western ally control, and committed other actions that resulted in far too many deaths.

US General George S. Patton did not hold any punches on his distain for the Soviet and Stalin's thirst for conquest at the cost of civilian collateral and was often criticized for it by the US media and politicians because the USSR was our "ally" in WWII. This "under-reporting" and "we can't criticize Stalin because he was our ally" -- e.g., "The Big Three" (FDR, Churchill and Stalin) -- is why most people think Hitler was far worse.

Stalin was also responsible for the countless deaths after the war, and his techniques have been used by various people -- including Saddam Hussein. Stalin takes the cake on the number of innocent civilians killed -- worse than Hitler.
 

niptuck

How far do you blow your load?
DrMotorcity said:
I have this peculiar, and strange little habit when ever I make a reply in a thread: I always read the title of it first before making my reply.

By the way, did Jeffrey Dahmer serve one term or to as prime minister of Lower Southeast Glockenspielia? Or wasn't it that his running-mate, Charles Manson, resigned from the party and sucessfully defeated the incumbent, while setting the political stage for years to come by spear-heading a powerfuly party block that would bring to supreme power the likes of Ted Bundy, Dennis Rader, and of course, the ubiquitous Sam Other(?!)

You tell me.

:rofl: :rofl: :bowdown: Best post in this thread :)

Speaking of Stalin: he did actually kill people personally. At their inception, the Communist party was a heavily terrorist organisation that was funded in large part by robberies and hijackings. Stalin came to prominence by staging and participating in some successful robberies of various banks in Souther Russia
 

niptuck

How far do you blow your load?
I don't think many of you know about Chikatilo? That bastard has raped and killed over 80 women, most of them below the age of 16 until he was put down like a rabid dog. Stalin is far more demonic than Hitler, no contest there. But at least he was a statesman, whereas Chikatilo was a murdering paedophile
 

Christmas_Ape

Freeones T-shirt Winner
when I first saw the list, and saw Dennis Rader, I thought it said Dennis Rodman. Then I thought "Dirtiest, Rottenest Motherfucker Who Ever Lived" was the title of his next book.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
4G63 said:
It's a poll. But no ranking?

I'm sure the Cambodians, the Jews, the Russians, and all the other victims, need to know who's oppressor was the "worst". Mass-murderers are all equal in their evil, and their names, like them, should die. Their atrocities will never be forgotten, I don't see the need to bring up the worst criminals and their crimes.

My Mother-in-law is from the killing-fields, and it would take a cold-hearted SOB to ask her about Pol Pot. I find this all very offensive, because it's offensive.

But respond with how I'm preaching and how you have every right to ask who's a better genocidal maniac. At least 10 million people died from the men on your list, I think they deserve the respect of not being ranked. And I feel that this is a ranking, because you can view the results!


I'm very sorry about your mother-in-law's experience but this discussion is a viable and reasonable one. I must continue to take exception with your stance that, simply because you "don't see the need" to bring the subject up, that it should not be discussed. There's not a single thread on this whole forum for which there is a "need".

Horrible things have happened throughout history. Therefore, it is offensive to discuss them? I don't follow that logic.
 

EvaForU

I shoot my load further than you can pee!
Bush is more dangerous than hitler because hitler was mad but bush is just idiot...

maybe he is not a bad person but he is doing all wrong...

Eva
 

GENIUS

I changed my middle-name to Freeones
worst in modern day serial killer terms then it goes to

pedro alonso lopez aka the monster of the andes who has raped and killed over 350 children

worst dictator then it's stalin who is directly responsible for the deaths of over 43 million people
 

pickles&cumquat

Keep the good porn coming!
The main reason why Hitler is viewed with more disdain, is the WAY he went about killing off the jews, not for the actual slaughter itself. The systematic hunt and the efficient killing squads, ghettos, and death camps are what sets him apart from Stalin in the minds of most. Hitler didn't just wipe out Jews from his own country, he tried to wipe out Jews everywhere.

Either way, Jews for the most part have been shitkicked by one society or another, for a multitude of reasons, and its a shame really, but also a testament to their survival.

Least we forget that we turned away millions of jews, during this ethnic cleansing, nobody wanted to take jews in, despite knowing full well the extermination they faced.

The world showed it did not learn from this mistake when Hutus started the ethnic slaughter of moderate hutus and Tutsi's in Rwanada, where identification cards (passports) determined whether you lived or died....

You want to talk about almost wiping out a nation, look at US history, and their treatment of native indians..... its difficult to find them today, other than on reservations....

Stalin and Mao are up there for poor treatment of their own kind
 

om3ga

It's good to be the king...
The dirtiest, rottenest motherfucker who ever lived.....

....hasn't been born yet.....

Sadly someone will one day, give cause for future generations to curse his (or her) name as much as we revile Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Bin-liner and so on today....

Jeez - that was depressing.........:(
 
Top