Female pornstars sluts or prostitutes?

[Hot Mega]

Didn't see the episode, but that's such an old and tired argument. Men who fuck tons of woman can be sluts too...if people choose to call them that. I've heard so many women make that same argument, yet those women never refer to a man as a slut. If women started calling men who sleep around "sluts", then they'd be sluts. It's not a double standard...it's the standard that nearly every woman I've ever met adheres to. It's really as simple as that.

I don't understand why some people on this thread seem to be so offended by the question. Yes, porn stars are prostitutes. That's only an insult if you think it's negative to be a prostitute. But the truth is, people like Sasha Grey are most likely not having 8 man blowbangs on their off time. It's a job. They making money fucking and doing as their told. So yes, porn "stars" are prostitutes, be they the female in the role or the man...unless that man is an unpaid participant who's wearing a lucha mask in some disgusting bukkake or gangbang record shoot. And in that case, that man isn't a prostitute, just really fucking creepy.

Hmmm...methinks you missed the point Lx5.

The point of me mentioning this perspective was the social and psychological difference between say a porn star who fucks allot of different people with no emotional attachment (while earning a living for doing so) with the kind of man (or woman) who fucks allot of people with no emotional attachment because of lust.

In a vacuum the average man would likely look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for taking pay to do something another male celebrity or star athlete does for free with no aim beyond their trifle.

I wasn't making a point about the tired, old female slut vs. male "slut" argument.

It was about the perception of male, public personalities vs. that of porn starlets and how women are expected to ignore that in men...while men look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for the same acts they do for different ends.

Given that...in a sense the porn starlets position comes off more sensible and honorable in spite of the perception.

Bearing in mind..this is in the context of this thread.

 

[timon]

neither nor
they are great people doing a great job and they make people happy what more

 

[belgianass]

Must I call them sluts or prostitutes? They are fucking also for money just like prostititutes. You think, there is a different between both groups?

Did your parents ever teached you manners ? How would you feel if someone came up to you with an opener like that ...
My dad used to say that "Respect only returnes if you give it away with an open mind and heart"

 

[Johan]

Everybody pays for sex. What's the difference between giving her money upfront and paying for dinner and a movie? Ur looking for the same result right

The difference is that if yo're paying the dinner or the movie, you ain't sure your girl will pay you back with sex, she mays not.

If you give money to a prostitute you're 100% sure she will fuck you

 

[LaLiLuLeLohan]

Hmmm...methinks you missed the point Lx5.

The point of me mentioning this perspective was the social and psychological difference between say a porn star who fucks allot of different people with no emotional attachment (while earning a living for doing so) with the kind of man (or woman) who fucks allot of people with no emotional attachment because of lust.

In a vacuum the average man would likely look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for taking pay to do something another male celebrity or star athlete does for free with no aim beyond their trifle.

I wasn't making a point about the tired, old female slut vs. male "slut" argument.

It was about the perception of male, public personalities vs. that of porn starlets and how women are expected to ignore that in men...while men look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for the same acts but different ends.

Given that...in a sense the porn starlets position comes off more sensible and honorable in spite of the perception.

It's perception. It's general perception that porn stars have to fuck strangers and do humiliating shit in order to make a living. Just as a gardener most mow lawn or a dentist must fill cavities to make a living.

So of course the attitudes towards somebody like, say, Gene Simmons fucking a hot groupie because he can are going to be different than the attitudes of somebody who will lick three mens' cum out of a dog bowl because she must.

Most people strive to be the man who has such a beautiful house and lawn that he loves mowing his own grass. Few people hope that one day they'll mow peoples lawns in order to make rent. It has nothing to do with gender...see who's more widely respected; Madonna or Ron Jeremy. It's a matter of position and peoples perception of why people get into porn in the first place.

 

[LaLiLuLeLohan]

The difference is that if yo're paying the dinner or the movie, you ain't sure your girl will pay you back with sex, she mays not.

If you give money to a prostitute you're 100% sure she will fuck you

Yeah man.

Maybe I'm a delusional whacko, but there are also some men out there who actually enjoy the company of a woman even when it doesn't involve their cock. If taking a girl out on a date is entirely about pussy to some, I think they should save time, money and frustration and head on down to the massage parlor or check some ads in the free papers.

 

[Hot Mega]

It's perception. It's general perception that porn stars have to fuck strangers and do humiliating shit in order to make a living. Just as a gardener most mow lawn or a dentist must fill cavities to make a living.

So of course the attitudes towards somebody like, say, Gene Simmons fucking a hot groupie because he can are going to be different than the attitudes of somebody who will lick three mens' cum out of a dog bowl because she must.

Most people strive to be the man who has such a beautiful house and lawn that he loves mowing his own grass. Few people hope that one day they'll mow peoples lawns in order to make rent. It has nothing to do with gender...see who's more widely respected; Madonna or Ron Jeremy. It's a matter of position and peoples perception of why people get into porn in the first place.

That's the problem again Lx5...the perception that some of these chicks must do this or that or in fact that some of these chicks are doing things they otherwise wouldn't be doing in their personal life.

Do you know how many women have real life fantasies about certain things you see in porn or do things in porn that they're actually in to?

Sure some do some things only because they are paid for the performance and sure there are some who take jobs they may not necessarily like but do it anyway because of some contract or whatever or simply because porn is their job.

But think about it though..is that very different from the fact that some of the average people take jobs they wouldn't otherwise take or have jobs that are humiliating or work for a boss which degrades and/or berates them?

As far as why some get into porn in the first place...:dunno: We know at bottom it's an industry that requires little more than the looks to get into and the will to be an exhibitionist for money. So of course the industry will lend itself to allot of misguided or confused young women. But it is an industry and their are people who simply choose to do it and like every minute of it.

 

[busenbust]

I call them porno stars

 

[Johan]

Yeah man.

Maybe I'm a delusional whacko, but there are also some men out there who actually enjoy the company of a woman even when it doesn't involve their cock. If taking a girl out on a date is entirely about pussy to some, I think they should save time, money and frustration and head on down to the massage parlor or check some ads in the free papers.

You ain't delusional, I'm one of these guys.

I don't plan to have sex with my dates, sex is not some kind of ojective. I don't push things, I just let them happen naturally. If the date ends with sex, well, that's cool. If it doesn't, it's no big deal, it may still have been a great date (and even if it had ended with sex, it may have been a lame date).

 

[shimmy2]

lately i call them dental assistants

 

[LaLiLuLeLohan]

You ain't delusional, I'm one of these guys.

I don't plan to have sex with my dates, sex is not some kind of ojective. I don't push things, I just let them happen naturally. If the date ends with sex, well, that's cool. If it doesn't, it's no big deal, it may still have been a great date (and even if it had ended with sex, it may have been a lame date).

That's really good to hear, man.

 

[monicasilver]

Hmmm...methinks you missed the point Lx5.

The point of me mentioning this perspective was the social and psychological difference between say a porn star who fucks allot of different people with no emotional attachment (while earning a living for doing so) with the kind of man (or woman) who fucks allot of people with no emotional attachment because of lust.

In a vacuum the average man would likely look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for taking pay to do something another male celebrity or star athlete does for free with no aim beyond their trifle.

I wasn't making a point about the tired, old female slut vs. male "slut" argument.

It was about the perception of male, public personalities vs. that of porn starlets and how women are expected to ignore that in men...while men look upon a porn starlet disparagingly for the same acts they do for different ends.

Given that...in a sense the porn starlets position comes off more sensible and honorable in spite of the perception.

Bearing in mind..this is in the context of this thread.

Is the assumption that prostitution is bad?

Is the assumption that being a prostitute is bad?

 

[Hot Mega]

Is the assumption that prostitution is bad?

Is the assumption that being a prostitute is bad?

The general assumption and perception is that it's "bad". My personal opinion is it's just another thing that people do.

I suppose I'm a hypocrite on it like most people can be on things. I don't have a problem with people who do it and think they should have the right but I wouldn't want someone I cared about doing it.

 

[busenbust]

Must I call them sluts or prostitutes? They are fucking also for money just like prostititutes. You think, there is a different between both groups?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaughMust, u ask??

...and why so angry???

 

[unicornshunter]

Who cares, get a life.

 

[HELLRAISER]

Must I call them sluts or prostitutes? They are fucking also for money just like prostititutes. You think, there is a different between both groups?

It's interesting how some people view women in prostitution or the sex industry as sluts for engaging in sexual acts for material gain, yet girlfriends and housewives who also fuck for money, housing, and other material things are not seen as sluts

 

[SpexyAshleigh]

It's interesting how some people view women in prostitution or the sex industry as sluts for engaging in sexual acts for material gain, yet girlfriends and housewives who also fuck for money, housing, and other material things are not seen as sluts

If you're talking about girlfriends, wives etc...there's a relationship and hopefully monogamy going on, so its not slutty at all. And while there ARE some like that, most women aren't housewives and work for their own money nowadays, so your point doesn't really hold any validity. Being in a loving relationship, even IF one person is the sole wage earner doesn't mean a woman is fucking for money.

 

[drf]

This is a stupid and childish topic. The answer is neither.

 

[HELLRAISER]

If you're talking about girlfriends, wives etc...there's a relationship and hopefully monogamy going on, so its not slutty at all. And while there ARE some like that, most women aren't housewives and work for their own money nowadays, so your point doesn't really hold any validity. Being in a loving relationship, even IF one person is the sole wage earner doesn't mean a woman is fucking for money.

I'm sure some intimate relationships are truly monogamous just in other relationships there's deception and infidelity.

I know some women work for their money just as their are some women who don't earn an income and depend on their partner to provide for them so my point holds water when talking about the latter.

If one person is the sole wage earner might not necesarrily mean a woman is fucking her spouse for money but their are women in relationships who will fuck solely for material gain until they find the right sucker to hook, gut and hang dry

 

[shayd]

This is a stupid and childish topic. The answer is neither.

Reason? Is that you?