You associate me with the negatives of my heritage? That is like me associating every White with the KKK and every Black with the Black panthers.
Well, since you could pass for David Duke or Huey Newton in many of your posts... :dunno:
BTW, since you keep saying that BioDefenseGrad is an Indian (
and he keeps saying that he's not), how do you
know that? Have you ever met him or even seen a picture of him? No? OK, so how do you know???
Pardon me for saying so, but the reason that I get such a kick out of you is because you start
so many race based threads and go on & on about race based issues
so much, all the while calling out other people for being "racists", yet you are perhaps the worst offender that I've seen on this board since I've been here. And let's be even more honest: the only reason (IMO) that the mods are letting you get away with this foolishness is because you're claiming that you're a member of a disenfranchised minority group. In fact, we don't
really know whether you're an Indian or not... just as you don't know the first thing about BioDefenseGrad's race or ethnicity.
A lot of us poke fun at each other here, or even get into heated debates/arguments from time to time. That's just what happens on forums. Hell, I've probably pissed off at least half the people on my "Friend's List" at one time or another. But you tend to go WAY over the line (and get away with it) more than anybody I've seen.
So you hang onto that "
I'm a poor Indian victim of racial discrimination" crutch for as long as you can, amigo. But sooner than later, that crutch is going to wear thin and snap.
) and also the secular India. So whilst everyone had been living amongst each other in relative calm you now had all the muslims scurrying to leave India to head to muslim Pakistan whilst the Sikhs, Hindus and Christians who were living in what was the newly formed muslim Pakistan wanted to leave for secular India and as these groups crossed each other they clashed leaving more than a million dead. The Sikhs were screwed over the most as they were promised a sikh homeland in the punjab called Khalistan if they helped Britain in WW2, many sikhs died fighting the germans in europe and japanese in asia and Britain went back on its promise. Then out of sheer bitterness of having to relinquish India they drew the Kashmir border where they new the newly formed countries of India and Pakistan would fight over for many years to come which they have done. And although the British never introduced the caste system to India they sure as hell used it to their advantage to maintain control of the region, the've also segregated people in Northern Ireland, israel/palestine, cyprus, nigeria and the sudan in a policy which is known as divide and rule/conquer. It's simply easier for a colonial power to control a divided population than one that may unite together. Of course these were the actions of colonial Britain and the only way they could maintain an empire as large as she had and does not reflect the Britain of today in any way shape or form
