Liar Waitress Fired For Great Justice

[xfire]

http://nypost.com/2013/12/07/waitress-claiming-couple-didnt-tip-because-shes-gay-gets-fired/

A New Jersey waitress who raked in thousands in donations after claiming a couple didn’t tip her because she’s gay was fired from her job on Saturday.

Dayna Morales, 22, was finally canned from Gallop Asian Bistro in Bridgewater — nearly a month after she made national headlines over what’s likely a hoax.

The restaurant announced her termination on Facebook Saturday shortly after it was revealed she was returning donations from supporters across the world.

“In light of … recent events, both Ms. Morales and Gallop Asian Bistro have made a joint decision that Ms. Morales will no longer continue her employment at our restaurant,” the eatery wrote. “We wish her well in the future.”

The waitress, a former Marine, claimed the couple stiffed her on a $93.55 bill and left a note saying, “I’m sorry but I cannot tip because I do not agree with your lifestyle.”

What a fucking attention whore.

But her tale of prejudice began to unravel after the unnamed diners came forward with receipts showing an $18 tip.

The purported incident created a media firestorm, with well-wishers sending Morales at least $3,000 in donations through a PayPal account. Morales claimed she’d send proceeds to the Wounded Warrior Project, but the group said it hasn’t received anything.

Meanwhile some donors said their money was quietly returned over the weekend.

“I received a refund … for the donation I made to Dayna Morales,” Kate Dols posted on the “Have a Gay Day” Facebook page. “Glad to see she is doing the right thing … Dayna, you need help, please seek it.”

Acquaintances say Morales — who was dishonorably discharged from the military — has a history of fibbing and at one point pretended she had terminal cancer.

“She exaggerated every story,” former coworker Julie Howat told The Post. “I knew [the receipt] was fake. When the articles came out, everyone at my job laughed.”

Unleash the litigators!

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

Many, many cases turn out to be liberal agitators making up stuff. There are even sites documenting dozens of incidents. Some of them are desperate people looking to evade creditors, but the most glaring contingent are liberal activist types.

http://fakehatecrimes.org
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323628004578459014086443112
http://takimag.com/article/my_10_favorite_hate_crime_hoaxes_gavin_mcinnes/print#axzz2oS4nOciW

 

[lurkingdirk]

liberal liberal

 

[xfire]

Liberal really has no meaning when you say it, BDG.

 

[lurkingdirk]

Liberal really has no meaning when you say it, BDG.

Really it's more an issue that his first response on any given issue. Some examples:

Person 1: Man, I hate rainy days like this.
BDG: Fucking liberals, they hate rain. It makes crops grow.
Person 1: Nono, it's not that I hate the rain, it's just that I have trouble with depression, so dark days make me sad.
BDG: Fucking liberals, they cause rain and depression.

Honestly, man. Alter your repertoire just a little, and your arguments would be SO much more effective.

 

[HappyHapyJoyJoy]

I thought the meaning was clear...

...liberals are the source of all conundrums in the world. Oh, and they're probably from space! :eek:

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

Liberal really has no meaning when you say it, BDG.

I wouldn't expect a liberal to want to accept that truth. Take a look at the links provided in the first list. Liberal activists pop up over and over and over again. It's not like we're forcing those folks to do what they do. They just put their agenda above truth, rule of law and community cohesion. They want to paint society as evil so that they can gain legitimacy, sympathy and authority.

Notice how the latest duo caught were part of the campus Bias Incident Response Team? They were in charge of investigating anything seen as racist, insensitive, anti-gay, anti-feminist etc. and it turns out they were manufacturing incidents on campus.

Even more troubling, they were both involved in the campus sexual misconduct task force and now a male student is suing the school for violating his civil rights. With two members of your organization caught manufacturing incidents on ideological grounds (and this is on ultra-liberal Vassar college mind you) doesn't that perhaps lend creedence to this young man's claim that he was railroaded? Especially when the details that are known make it seem like the evidence against him is flimsy?
http://reason.com/archives/2013/12/17/guilty-until-proven-innocent
http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/11/w...ps-also-involved-in-a-false-rape-prosecution/
http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2013/08/the_dubious_rape_trial_at_vass.html

 

[lurkingdirk]

liberal Liberal liberal

Dude, no one is arguing with you that there are despicable Liberals who do all the things you are saying. The problem is that it isn't ALL liberals who do that. You lump all Liberals into one group, when that's just ridiculous. That's no different than lumping all Conservatives into one category on every issue. Rush Limbaugh is a Conservative, and the way he presents himself and his arguments is incredibly stupid, hateful, and harmful, but I would never equate what he says with my Conservative friends.

Why can't you acknowledge that there are good Liberals, bad Conservatives, and every shade in between? Get off the "everything is bad about Liberals, and I'm going to make every issue about stupid Liberals" kick, and actually have a conversation that involves a few facts and no enormous generalisations?

Merely a suggestion. Feel free to carry on. This'll be the last time I address you if that's your decision, because the things you are saying aren't worth addressing. I may just continue to follow your posts with quotes of how many times you use the word Liberal, but I guess we'll have to see how my energy level is.

 

[Will E Worm]

Many, many cases turn out to be liberal agitators making up stuff. There are even sites documenting dozens of incidents. Some of them are desperate people looking to evade creditors, but the most glaring contingent are liberal activist types.

http://fakehatecrimes.org
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323628004578459014086443112
http://takimag.com/article/my_10_favorite_hate_crime_hoaxes_gavin_mcinnes/print#axzz2oS4nOciW

:goodpost:


All "hate crime" and "hate speech" laws should be repealed.

Congress Should Not Pass But Repeal Hate Crimes Laws Link





Video: Obama Supporters Sign Petition to Repeal the Bill of Rights
Link

 

[CptHa]

Good. Fraud shouldn't be tolerated.

 

[xfire]

I wouldn't expect a liberal to want to accept that truth. Take a look at the links provided in the first list. Liberal activists pop up over and over and over again. It's not like we're forcing those folks to do what they do. They just put their agenda above truth, rule of law and community cohesion. They want to paint society as evil so that they can gain legitimacy, sympathy and authority. Notice how the latest duo caught were part of the campus Bias Incident Response Team? They were in charge of investigating anything seen as racist, insensitive, anti-gay, anti-feminist etc. and it turns out they were manufacturing incidents on campus. Even more troubling, they were both involved in the campus sexual misconduct task force and now a male student is suing the school for violating his civil rights. With two members of your organization caught manufacturing incidents on ideological grounds (and this is on ultra-liberal Vassar college mind you) doesn't that perhaps lend creedence to this young man's claim that he was railroaded? Especially when the details that are known make it seem like the evidence against him is flimsy?

You have political tourette's syndrome with a particular fixation on the word "liberal". You claim you're not conservative, fine, but I'm curious just how you characterize your political beliefs. What's your voting track record for the last few presidential races? You like to lambast others for your perception of their political views, well, it's time to turn that scrutiny around, if you've got the courage.

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

You have political tourette's syndrome with a particular fixation on the word "liberal". You claim you're not conservative, fine, but I'm curious just how you characterize your political beliefs. What's your voting track record for the last few presidential races? You like to lambast others for your perception of their political views, well, it's time to turn that scrutiny around, if you've got the courage.

You're hilarious. Go tell that to the folks here who post multiple threads bashing non-liberals or FOX news before you come at me. They also happen to be the same folks who swarm someone for posting something negative about liberals. You guys are so despicable I'm not even going to give you the time of day from now on.

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

Oh and in case you want to hound me on another thread: I've only voted for a Republican Presidential candidate one time out of several elections. I would have been just fine if the Democrat won the election.

 

[xfire]

You're hilarious. Go tell that to the folks here who post multiple threads bashing non-liberals or FOX news before you come at me. They also happen to be the same folks who swarm someone for posting something negative about liberals. You guys are so despicable I'm not even going to give you the time of day from now on.

What's so despicable about "us guys"? You're the one that turns every thread into a "liberal" bash.

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

What's so despicable about "us guys"? You're the one that turns every thread into a "liberal" bash.

It's actually quite the opposite. The same libs who make multiple threads bashing non-liberals and FOX also swarm non-liberals (this often backfires on the libs) and lobby to get them banned.

 

[Rey C.]

You have political tourette's syndrome with a particular fixation on the word "liberal".

Doesn't he though?

While I do think there was something of a desire on the part of the mainstream media to want to believe the waitress, and once it became clear that she was a liar and a fraud (going way back), they sort of let her silently slither back into her hole (no pun intended), what the hell does the incident itself have to do with whether she was a liberal, a conservative or a Moon Joo???!!! And for that matter, how do we know that the patrons, who she accused of stiffing her on the tip, weren't liberal Democrats who voted twice for Obama and gave their last dollar to get Cory Booker elected to the Senate?

Truly...

Personally, even though the diner voraciously defended her before they knew the facts (just so they'd be in the good graces of the GLAAD crowd), I'm glad they FINALLY fired her - although they have still not condemned her actions past or present. And for accepting money under false pretenses, claiming to make donations that cannot be verified and possibly keeping the money (Wounded Warrior project?) and just being a general piece of shit (lesbian, liberal, Moon Joo or not), I hope she soon faces criminal charges or a defamation lawsuit.

 

[Rey C.]

It's actually quite the opposite. The same libs who make multiple threads bashing non-liberals and FOX also swarm non-liberals (this often backfires on the libs) and lobby to get them banned.

Rev is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Andronicus is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Jane Burgess is a non-liberal. Does she get swarmed? No. Tia Ling is a non-liberal? Does/did she get swarmed? No. Wonder why? Because they are good guys and gals, who contribute to the board and don't just follow the same line of agenda driven bullshit post after post, thread after thread... over and fucking over again, until the cows come home and turn blue in the face. They, unlike someone near and dear to you (), are not one trick ponies and they don't tend to :crybaby: or :horse: until the rest of us and eventually snap on them. Even here, on a porn board, there is only so much stupid that people can put up with. As hard as you may find this to accept (and I know that you will), the people who tend to get swarmed on here are the ones who make a point of showing in fine style that they can be the absolute biggest asshats, douchebags and clown shoes that the world has ever known. And it's not just on political topics; the adult baby-men on here, who still live with their parents and have never touched a live pair of tits in their lives, but make dumber-than-a-bag-of-hair posts about sex and female body parts, they also get "swarmed", as you put it. The common thread to getting swarmed is being a dumbass, not (just) being an alleged or so-called conservative or liberal hater.

Sam Fisher, Philbert, Blue Countach (who I actually liked, even when we didn't agree, until he began to slowly go mad) and others never got swarmed (or banned) because of their tired, copy & paste, "generic" conservative views. They got swarmed (and banned) because of the immense dumbassity and angry bile that they spewed with every frickin' post that they made!

You're welcome. :hatsoff:

 

[lurkingdirk]

Rev is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Andronicus is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Jane Burgess is a non-liberal. Does she get swarmed? No. Tia Ling is a non-liberal? Does/did she get swarmed? No. Wonder why? Because they are good guys and gals, who contribute to the board and don't just follow the same line of agenda driven bullshit post after post, thread after thread... over and fucking over again, until the cows come home and turn blue in the face. They, unlike someone near and dear to you (), are not one trick ponies and they don't tend to :crybaby: or :horse: until the rest of us and eventually snap on them. Even here, on a porn board, there is only so much stupid that people can put up with. As hard as you may find this to accept (and I know that you will), the people who tend to get swarmed on here are the ones who make a point of showing in fine style that they can be the absolute biggest asshats, douchebags and clown shoes that the world has ever known. And it's not just on political topics; the adult baby-men on here, who still live with their parents and have never touched a live pair of tits in their lives, but make dumber-than-a-bag-of-hair posts about sex and female body parts, they also get "swarmed", as you put it. The common thread to getting swarmed is being a dumbass, not (just) being an alleged or so-called conservative or liberal hater.

Sam Fisher, Philbert, Blue Countach (who I actually liked, even when we didn't agree, until he began to slowly go mad) and others never got swarmed (or banned) because of their tired, copy & paste, "generic" conservative views. They got swarmed (and banned) because of the immense dumbassity and angry bile that they spewed with every frickin' post that they made!

You're welcome. :hatsoff:

Now that's a good post!

- - - Updated - - -

Rev is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Andronicus is a non-liberal. Does he get swarmed? No. Jane Burgess is a non-liberal. Does she get swarmed? No. Tia Ling is a non-liberal? Does/did she get swarmed? No. Wonder why? Because they are good guys and gals, who contribute to the board and don't just follow the same line of agenda driven bullshit post after post, thread after thread... over and fucking over again, until the cows come home and turn blue in the face. They, unlike someone near and dear to you (), are not one trick ponies and they don't tend to :crybaby: or :horse: until the rest of us and eventually snap on them. Even here, on a porn board, there is only so much stupid that people can put up with. As hard as you may find this to accept (and I know that you will), the people who tend to get swarmed on here are the ones who make a point of showing in fine style that they can be the absolute biggest asshats, douchebags and clown shoes that the world has ever known. And it's not just on political topics; the adult baby-men on here, who still live with their parents and have never touched a live pair of tits in their lives, but make dumber-than-a-bag-of-hair posts about sex and female body parts, they also get "swarmed", as you put it. The common thread to getting swarmed is being a dumbass, not (just) being an alleged or so-called conservative or liberal hater.

Sam Fisher, Philbert, Blue Countach (who I actually liked, even when we didn't agree, until he began to slowly go mad) and others never got swarmed (or banned) because of their tired, copy & paste, "generic" conservative views. They got swarmed (and banned) because of the immense dumbassity and angry bile that they spewed with every frickin' post that they made!

You're welcome. :hatsoff:

Now that's a good post!