Loose Change - What Do You All Think?

[BlueBalls]

 

[lurkingdirk]

 

[~~whimsy~~]

How long will this thread now last? Careful guys, don't close the thread down by going too off topic with YouTube videos. This thread has been satiating my appetite for funnies.

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[lurkingdirk]

How long will this thread now last? Careful guys, don't close the thread down by going too off topic with YouTube videos. This thread has been satiating my appetite for funnies.

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[lurkingdirk]

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[Ulysses31]

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[robbied196]

As stated in the PNAC document they needed a new Pearl Harbor type event to get the change they wanted. It was a very multipurpose false flag. They took away freedom, got people hating Muslims, got people to support illegal wars, got people to forget about the missing Trillions announced Sept 10 by Donald Rumsfeld, and Larry Silverstein made a killing on insurance.

And they could get free reign in Afghanistan to grow the opium for black ops money, and get the pipeline they wanted through Afghanistan.

They took away freedom, well 'freedom' is a myth anyway, but that's another thread.

Got people hating Muslims, well that's a pretty sweeping statement but it is a point, but by the same point you could say a lot of muslims hate americans, and would be perfectly prepared to attack america at any given opportunity.

Support illegal wars, that's true. But with Iraq it was done under the premise that Saddam had womd, which he didn't. The invasion was a follow up to the 90/91 Gulf War for non compliance. Nothing to do with 911.

Afghanistan, was already invaded before 911 because they needed regime change to get approval for Unocal and the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline.

Got people to forget about the missing Trillions, I guess there was a lot of distraction, but to get everyone to forget would take a huge hypnosis operation.

Its good that you answer the question, but you appear to blindly follow the conspiracy theory regardless of any alternative view. That's a very narrow minded stand point. At some point you have to make a judgment based on common sense. There are a million more flaws in the argument for a cover up of an inside job than there ever will be for a terrorist attack.

We all rely on the media and news for information, and that information may be corrupt, but by the same token you have to accept your information may be corrupt. However, and despite that, until there is a viable reason for a conspiracy the only common sense conclusion is that it was a terrorist attack.

 

[lurkingdirk]

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[robbied196]

I love the Clangers, you'll love 8.28

 

[mr. jizz]

lawl, I guess this thread has officially been changed to post a random song thread. :thumbsup:

 

[lurkingdirk]

 

[Spleen]

 

[BlueBalls]

 

[WTC7WasPulled]

They took away freedom, well 'freedom' is a myth anyway, but that's another thread.

Got people hating Muslims, well that's a pretty sweeping statement but it is a point, but by the same point you could say a lot of muslims hate americans, and would be perfectly prepared to attack america at any given opportunity.

Support illegal wars, that's true. But with Iraq it was done under the premise that Saddam had womd, which he didn't. The invasion was a follow up to the 90/91 Gulf War for non compliance. Nothing to do with 911.

Afghanistan, was already invaded before 911 because they needed regime change to get approval for Unocal and the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline.

Got people to forget about the missing Trillions, I guess there was a lot of distraction, but to get everyone to forget would take a huge hypnosis operation.

Its good that you answer the question, but you appear to blindly follow the conspiracy theory regardless of any alternative view. That's a very narrow minded stand point. At some point you have to make a judgment based on common sense. There are a million more flaws in the argument for a cover up of an inside job than there ever will be for a terrorist attack.

We all rely on the media and news for information, and that information may be corrupt, but by the same token you have to accept your information may be corrupt. However, and despite that, until there is a viable reason for a conspiracy the only common sense conclusion is that it was a terrorist attack.

Wow dude if all those reasons aren't enough there are more. They actually used Al Qaeda in Iraq to invade Saddam even though Al Qaeda supposedly hated Saddam with a passion. So 9/11 was used for both wars.

You are kidding me right?

Jet fuel?

Ha ha ha!

 

[Trident1]

As stated in the PNAC document they needed a new Pearl Harbor type event to get the change they wanted. It was a very multipurpose false flag. They took away freedom, got people hating Muslims, got people to support illegal wars, got people to forget about the missing Trillions announced Sept 10 by Donald Rumsfeld, and Larry Silverstein made a killing on insurance.

And they could get free reign in Afghanistan to grow the opium for black ops money, and get the pipeline they wanted through Afghanistan.

Complete and total bs to the tenth degree.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhJZXOWNdMM&feature=related



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnwsvO41F94