So am I.
Those physical characteristics I mentioned before sound alarms for me. Do they sound alarms (or pop up red warning flags) for you?
What do you think of busty super skinny models:boobies:?
-
Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!
Maria Swan / Princessa / Jana Defi
- Thread starter tonmcg
- Start date
So am I.
Those physical characteristics I mentioned before sound alarms for me. Do they sound alarms (or pop up red warning flags) for you?
What do you think of busty super skinny models:boobies:?
I stand to gain nothing either way whether her tits are fake or real. My ego isn't wrapped up in it. That is why I haven't entered the debate before.
Her managers and the industry stand to gain profit by creating an interest throught this debate.
If Jana is more popular as a 'natural' then that's the way they go.
Some doctors are motivated by humanitarian considerations. They want to heal. Others are more motivated by profit. Plastic surgeons tend to be more motivated by profit. It's where the big bucks are.
So Pinups pay him some cash and he "proves" that her tits are real.
That is one nagging doubt I have.
Here are the others (that boob officionados should recognize):
1. The "I" shaped cleavage.
2. The folds/creases in the lower inside under locations of the boobs.
3. Maybe I'm crazy. Maybe I'm seeing things. Anyone can agree or show me that I'm wrong, but I see two "half moon" scars at the top and bottom of both arolae in some images of her.
Ultimately in Jana's case, it doesn't matter to me. If she has implants they are very small and the doctor did a good job. She is very pretty and either way, I don't think any the less of her.
I don't like obvious boob jobs and prefer huge all natural boobs, just as I prefer everything that is real and all natural.
With Jana, this is not an issue with me.
My fantasy is to see her drop 40-60 lbs and become a proana model.
What part of the sonogram portion of the video did you miss out on? It was very clearly done in real time, on camera, in plain view. We panned the camera back and forth between her boobs and the sonogram screen and even had them in the same shot, with the radiologist explaining over and over in plain English exactly what it is you are seeing as he moves the sonogram wand over her breast. I don't know how much more clear we can make it than that. An X-ray could be faked or photoshopped or anything. That was LIVE video footage of a sonogram examination right in front of your very eyes.
All of it. I haven't seen it.
Being the cynic that I am, it is possible that what was shown on the sonogram screen were images of someone else's boobs fed into the machine (off camera.) Similar to when we view something via live satellite. We can hear and see someone and they can hear and see us and respond to our questions - we can communicate live time even though we may be thousands of miles distant. With today's technology such Hollywood magic is possible.
You ought to know. You are the provider of such wonderful dreams (as Jana.)
As I said above, either way - I don't think any the less of her.
I didn't type the sentence you are now reading. It was the guy in the room next to me off-forum who did it.
h00t3rl0v3r
My nipples are like bullets!
Bob777
Freeones is my God
Boobies :eek:
AlaeNoctis
Banned
:rofl2:
Actually, there are only two conspiracy theories that hold any water with me:
1. Like Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was an inside job.
2. The December 25 Christmas Day 2009 "Panty Bomber" (passenger airline bomber) was a ward of the CIA in a Pentagon operation.
Look at Jana. She comes pretty close. See the ribs on her chest? See the ribs of her rib cage? See her slender arms? See her flat stomach? See her hip bones protruding? See her slender legs?
Does the sonogram screen show both Jana's boobs and her face in the same frame (at the same time)? If not, then by believing that the natural boobs the sonogram is displaying are Jana's is a leap of faith. Right? Right?
The sonogram can purportedly show the innards of Jana's (or at least someone's) boobs.
What the sonogram cannot do is physically alter Jana's cleavage, remove scars and skin folds.
So.... what you're telling me is you put your faith in a machine (the sonogram) over your and other people's 'Mark I eyeballs'.
Yeah, o.k.:wave:
I'll leave you to ponder two questions:
1. Why did PinUpGlam go to such lenghts and expense to 'prove' that Jana's boobs are 'natural'?
2. Who stands to benefit by this, and how?
Does the footage of the Obama inauguration show Obama and the millions of people who showed up in the same frame (at the same time)? It doesn't. Therefore, he wasn't sworn in in Washington and he's not President. It was done in a studio in the backlot of Universal and the crowds were really superimposed from a bluescreen.
Come on man, I'm glad you're thinking out of the box, but this conspiracy theory stuff is going too far. THEY'RE BOOBS, not secret government weaponry documents being smuggled to countries we arm then accuse of being aggressive. They're boobs! It's preposterous to think Pinupglam would invent this whole thing and conspire to deceive everybody over two large sacks on a woman's chest.
Her boobs were examined by a doctor, a professional, in PERSON, real time, in a professional setting using equipment that cannot lie. This is fact, man.
If that kind of video proof doesn't convince you, nothing will. I'd say just move on and think they are fake all you want.
She does by proving the ignorant masses wrong.
You are entitled to your opinion, even if it contradicts established fact. In your world, Jana's boobs are fake. Fine.
Hell, there are even a group of people on the planet who believe the Earth is flat. This has been PROVEN otherwise.
Most of us around here don't like the word "flat", anyway.
Member2019
1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Going to regret this ...
Let's see here ... 5'8", 38-25-39" figure, and we're arguing over if she's natural? Frankly, beyond her body, I love her refreshing, unique, original profile from the neck-up. Then again I find women like Brittany Spears to be rather plain looking.
Sorry guys, just don't really get caught up if she's natural or not. She's got too many other curves to really care, and the breasts she has seem to flow well enough. I'm not seeing any saline or silicone ridges myself, so I really can't care.
Let's see here ... 5'8", 38-25-39" figure, and we're arguing over if she's natural? Frankly, beyond her body, I love her refreshing, unique, original profile from the neck-up. Then again I find women like Brittany Spears to be rather plain looking.
Sorry guys, just don't really get caught up if she's natural or not. She's got too many other curves to really care, and the breasts she has seem to flow well enough. I'm not seeing any saline or silicone ridges myself, so I really can't care.
EwaSonnetIsGod
I need to clean my screen
The Earth isnt flat? How can you claim such bullshit. I know this guy who knows this guy that was sailing one day and heard a story about someone who sailed too far and went off the edge. That sounds pretty clearcut to me. How can you dispute proof like like that? As for Jana...100% real and I'd bet my dick on it.
The thought doesn't enter your mind that PinUpGlam does? All the controversy over whether Jana's boobs are real or not generates interest in the video(s) and the Pinupfiles site. Increased traffic on the site provides advertizement for PinUpFiles/PinUpGlam and likely an increase in paid subscribers and profits for the company.
The doctor also benefits in that:
1. For a few minutes of easy and pleasurable work, he gets paid big bucks.
2. He gets very good advertizement.
3. He gets his 'Andy Warhol's 15 minutes of fame'.
4. He goes down in history as the first guy to cop rather a few good feels of Jana's boobs in public on record.
What's not to like?
What amazes me is that so far, everyone who is adamant that Jana's boobs are real, ignore the empirical (physical/forensic) evidence of the shape of her cleavage, scars and skin folds, that suggest otherwise. Is searching for these signs of fake versus natural boobs a lost art?
This debate has been proven a long time ago. Ever since sailors have gone out to sea, people watching the ships disappear on the horizon noticed that the last thing they saw were the highest points on the ships (the masts) and concluded from this that the world must be round. These people weren't 'Copernicuses' or 'Galileos'. They were able to figure things out for themselves by using their 'Mark I human eyeballs' and the reasonable intelligence we all possess.
So you see? Such debates can be concluded without having to travel to outer space or relying on the wizardry of modern gadgets/science.
Most of us around here don't like the word "flat", anyway.
I agree. I've always preferred the mountains over the plains.
neighborboy
FreeOnes turned me straight!
This is a very old and very tired debate. I was skeptical at first when I saw her many years ago, based on size alone, but none of those suspicions have borne any fruit, and I consider myself something of an expert in uncovering fake boobs (just check out my 40 and over no silicone thread).
First, I have yet to see any convincing evidence of scarring anywhere near her breasts. There is a flap of skin in her left cleavage, but I'm more than willing to concede that as an effect of a pair of very large breasts outgrowing themselves. My wife only has B/C cups, and I can produce the exact same effect by just pulling down gently on her breast.
Another important test for implants is how they behave when the model lays on her back. Implants stick out like gravity doesn't matter. Check out some galleries with models with implants
like Claire Dames here http://www.pinkvisualhdgalleries.com/galleries/episode/3716/jpg/3716_40.jpg
from http://www.pinkvisualhdgalleries.co...ire-Dames-2/Picture/02?revid=1195&nopop=1&s=1
Real breasts sag and melt into the chest. What do Maria Swan's breasts do when she lies on her back? They melt back. They haven't invented an implant that can do this:
http://boobsdir.com/wp-content/gallery/JanaDefi001/janadefi-daywith02-03.jpg
or this http://boobsdir.com/wp-content/gallery/JanaDefi001/janadefi-daywith02-14.jpg
from here http://boobsdir.com/busty_girls/jan...reenshots-of-a-leaked-footage-janadefi001-294
...therefore those magnificent breasts are real.
First, I have yet to see any convincing evidence of scarring anywhere near her breasts. There is a flap of skin in her left cleavage, but I'm more than willing to concede that as an effect of a pair of very large breasts outgrowing themselves. My wife only has B/C cups, and I can produce the exact same effect by just pulling down gently on her breast.
Another important test for implants is how they behave when the model lays on her back. Implants stick out like gravity doesn't matter. Check out some galleries with models with implants
like Claire Dames here http://www.pinkvisualhdgalleries.com/galleries/episode/3716/jpg/3716_40.jpg
from http://www.pinkvisualhdgalleries.co...ire-Dames-2/Picture/02?revid=1195&nopop=1&s=1
Real breasts sag and melt into the chest. What do Maria Swan's breasts do when she lies on her back? They melt back. They haven't invented an implant that can do this:
http://boobsdir.com/wp-content/gallery/JanaDefi001/janadefi-daywith02-03.jpg
or this http://boobsdir.com/wp-content/gallery/JanaDefi001/janadefi-daywith02-14.jpg
from here http://boobsdir.com/busty_girls/jan...reenshots-of-a-leaked-footage-janadefi001-294
...therefore those magnificent breasts are real.
lil_sparky
Closed Account
Her body is absolutely stunning! Add me to the fan club.
OMFG. I've been talking this entire time to someone who HASN'T EVEN SEEN THE VIDEO ITSELF???
WTF, man? Are you kidding me??? You don't have a right to make your case, bro!
Not wasting anymore time on this!
Nice video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWRCd877lHk&feature=fvw
I can think of much more engaging videos to watch. Like a beautiful girl getting it on in some hot and steamy sex.
Who are you trying to convince on the naturalness of Jana's boobs?
You?
Or me?
If you are absolutely convinced that Jana's boobs are all natural, why do you need to watch a video of a machine (that purportedly shows they are natural) to convince yourself of something you already are certain of?
Another issue that the question, "Why did PinUpGlam go to such length and expense to show that Jana's boobs are all natural?", (and why Jana and not someone else) raises is:
There must have been a large number of people who raised a large number of very good comments, questions and concerns over the possibility that Jana may have implants to warrant PinUpGlam's actions.
.:I'm more interested in the discussion about Jana's boobs being natural or not than whether her boobs actually are natural or not.
Physical exercise makes for a strong and healthy body.
Mental exercise makes for a strong and healthy mind.
Amen, Brother!
For a long time I was convinced Honey Moons, L.A. Bust and Tabatha Towers' boobs were natural.
They all naturally changed shape with body motion, position and consequent change in the effects of gravity, as you describe above.
Then I saw videos that revealed scars (for L.A., she had an 'under the boob job', it's in a self titled video in a scene where she strokes a garden hose like a phallus) for Tabatha, I could see scars around the arolae and her Tabatha's Super Video shows where her natural boobs and the implants begin and end when she gyrates around on the exercise machine. For Honey, I could see the scars around her arolae and the natural hang above but the 'water balloon' shape of implants below.
There's a matter of degree. Not all girls get huge implants.
L.A., Tabatha and Honey were naturally large to begin with. L.A. probably got implants to make herself even bigger and Tabatha and Honey got implants, post pregnancy partum, to counteract the effects of sagging.
With Jana, one of her boobs may have been noticeably larger than the other. Possibly, she put an implant in one to even out the size - although I've seen images with the skin crease in both boobs but who knows, maybe that was computer generated for symmetry.
The smaller the implants, the less noticeable their presence.
