• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

MARK CUBAN: Here's What Republicans Should Do Next

xfire

@ChrisFreemanX
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mark-cuban-heres-republicans-next-151824930.html

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban has some advice for the Republican Party: Drop the social issues.

"If I was going to give guidance to the Republican Party, ... I'd say, 'Stay completely out of social issues," Cuban said Tuesday morning on CNBC's "Squawk Box."

The "Shark Tank" star and Dallas Mavericks owner said this would allow the GOP to communicate a strong message on the economy.

"If you stay out of social issues, then the conversation from that side will only be about economics, and business, and growing business, and ideas," he said. "It should be easy!"

Cuban also said he would have expected today's policy-makers to agree with him, given that many of them grew up in the 1960s and 1970s.

"The generation of sex, drugs, and rock and roll didn't turn out quite like we planned, right? We thought we'd be like, 'Live free. Stay out of the bedroom. Stay out of everybody's lives. Let's just focus on business,'" he said. "It turned out to be the exact opposite."

I don't think it's possible for the current GOP to separate themselves from social issues, they've catered to the intolerant for so long that "being republican" is about more than just politics, it's become a religious movement as much as a political position and unfortunately economics ain't their strong suit.
 

Lee Van Queef

Maybe I Should Get A Little High First
My Texas family are social conservatives. Some issues they won't budge on. My aunt actually rejected the Republicans last time saying, "That Mitt Romney. He believe in Jesus but he believe in Jesus diff'rent." I don't know how they actually voted but religion is a big deal. Both aunt and uncle are anti-marijuana and when backed into a corner about liquor say they want that prohibited as well. They were so sure Sarah Palin was running for President in 2012.

I agree with a lot of what Mark Cuban has to say. A Conservative Party must also evolve and change unless they want to become extinct. Money and business should be stressed. Common sense more than Kool Aid. If we're old enough to vote we're also adult enough to run our own lives.
 

sean miguel

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Didn't Mitt Romney steer clear of social issues? He focused on jobs and the economy from what I remember.

So which is it?
 

Lee Van Queef

Maybe I Should Get A Little High First
Didn't Mitt Romney steer clear of social issues? He focused on jobs and the economy from what I remember.

So which is it?

As far as my family I'm not sure if they were aware of his stances. They rejected him because he's a Mormon. I think they liked everything Sarah Palin stood for or what they thought she stood for. Could be image more than issues. I'm not sure how far they scratched beyond the surface.
 

MustBeGood

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Here is a example of religious right bull shit.

Pat Robertson calls gay rights activists 'terrorists'

By Dylan Stableford 3 hours ago
Yahoo News

A day after his controversial comments about AIDS were obliterated by Anderson Cooper, televangelist Pat Robertson called gay rights activists “terrorists."

On his Christian Broadcasting Network show on Wednesday, Robertson blasted Houston Mayor Annise Parker, who is gay, for issuing subpoenas to five prominent pastors who had opposed a new anti-discrimination law.

“These people are terrorists, they're radicals, and they're extremists,” Robertson told "700 Club" viewers. “No Christian in his right mind would ever try to enforce somebody against their belief or else suffer jail. Now they did that during the Inquisition. It was horrible. It was a black mark on our history, but it isn't being done now. There's no Christian group I know of anywhere in the world that would force somebody to do something contrary to their deep-held religious beliefs or else face criminal penalties, but that's what the homosexuals are trying to do here in America and I think it's time pastors stand up and fight this monstrous thing."

Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union slammed the subpoenas, saying they violated the pastors' civil rights.

"The government should never engage in fishing expeditions into the inner workings of a church," the ACLU said in a statement. "And any request for information must be carefully tailored to seek only what is relevant to the dispute.”

In response, Parker said the city would clarify the subpoenas, admitting they were “too broad.”

"If the gays want to go out and do their gay sex, that’s one thing," Robertson continued. "But if they want to force you to accept it and solemnify it by marriage, then that’s a different matter and it’s an infringement on people’s religious belief. What’s being done in Houston is a gay — the woman they elected is a homosexual, she’s a lesbian, and she’s trying to force pastors to conform to her beliefs. It’s wrong."

Earlier this month, Robertson was asked by a "700 Club" viewer if he should be concerned about traveling to Kenya in light of the Ebola outbreak. The 84-year-old televangelist replied that there was no need to worry about Ebola in Kenya. But he added: "You have to be careful about AIDS. The towels could have AIDS."

On Tuesday, Cooper dedicated his "Ridiculist" segment to respond to Robertson.

"If, Pat Robertson, you somehow missed all the research and the depth and information, you cannot get HIV if you share towels," the CNN host said.

Cooper mocked Robertson's advice, telling American travelers to remain in the United States. "Except steer clear of San Francisco [because] that is, of course, where all the gay people live, and Pat Robertson thinks they have a way of giving you 'the stuff.'"
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Didn't Mitt Romney steer clear of social issues? He focused on jobs and the economy from what I remember.

So which is it?

Social issues are at the core of the republican base so if you abandon them, you are sure to lose....just like Romney did in 2012. What majority coalition is going to vote strictly on money, jobs and business issues? Isn't going to happen. Besides, how can you "stay completely out of social issues"? A candidate is sure to be asked what his position is on abortion, school prayer, gay marriage, immigration, women's rights, marijuana, capital punishment, on and on....these issues can't be avoided. Cuban is wrong. It's a head-in-the sand viewpoint because he knows the conservative movement is on the losing end of the social-issue spectrum and that isn't going to change. Therefore, he wants it to just go away. It isn't.
 

sean miguel

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Here is a example of religious right bull shit.

Pat Robertson aside, that is an example of the left's intrusion into free speech which is total bullshit not to mention unconstitutional.

Houston's mayor, Annise Parker, not only subpoenaed pastors' sermons but any mention of herself in any of their communications. So basically, if you talked shit about the mayor, she wants to know about it. She's the mayor of Houston, not Pyongyang.
 

sean miguel

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Social issues are at the core of the republican base so if you abandon them, you are sure to lose....just like Romney did in 2012. What majority coalition is going to vote strictly on money, jobs and business issues? Isn't going to happen. Besides, how can you "stay completely out of social issues"? A candidate is sure to be asked what his position is on abortion, school prayer, gay marriage, immigration, women's rights, marijuana, capital punishment, on and on....these issues can't be avoided. Cuban is wrong. It's a head-in-the sand viewpoint because he knows the conservative movement is on the losing end of the social-issue spectrum and that isn't going to change. Therefore, he wants it to just go away. It isn't.

Romney didn't run on conservative social issues and McCain certainly didn't. The last GOP candidate who appealed to the conservative base won two terms.

Can it happen again? Maybe, maybe not. But that is the only chance IMO. Going moderate just hasn't worked.
 

MustBeGood

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Pat Robertson aside, that is an example of the left's intrusion into free speech which is total bullshit not to mention unconstitutional.

Houston's mayor, Annise Parker, not only subpoenaed pastors' sermons but any mention of herself in any of their communications. So basically, if you talked shit about the mayor, she wants to know about it. She's the mayor of Houston, not Pyongyang.

The problem is in both parties is they forgot about The Founding Fathers emphasis of separation of Church and State.
 

sean miguel

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
The problem is in both parties is they forgot about The Founding Fathers emphasis of separation of Church and State.

The Founding Fathers were most concerned with government intrusion into the pulpit (which is what is happening in Houston) than the other way around.

Their whole theme was putting limits on what government could do. It's one of the things Obama (the constitutional scholar) lamented during his 2008 campaign.
 

mongo18

A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke.
I don't think it's possible for the current GOP to separate themselves from social issues, they've catered to the intolerant for so long that "being republican" is about more than just politics, it's become a religious movement as much as a political position and unfortunately economics ain't their strong suit.

It's the social issues that incites their base, and besides, they can't run on economics or employment, because history has shown that they consistently suck at it. Unless they lie outright. Wait, never mind...

Didn't Mitt Romney steer clear of social issues? He focused on jobs and the economy from what I remember.

So which is it?

Romney made a lot of great sounding promises about jobs and the economy, but he outright refused to say how he was going to achieve any of it, he seemed happy to leave all that up to Ryan and even republicans would have to have doubts about electing that crazy piece of shit.
 

zeeblofowl_1969

I don't know and frankly I don't care.
It's the social issues that incites their base, and besides, they can't run on economics or employment, because history has shown that they consistently suck at it. Unless they lie outright. Wait, never mind...



Romney made a lot of great sounding promises about jobs and the economy, but he outright refused to say how he was going to achieve any of it, he seemed happy to leave all that up to Ryan and even republicans would have to have doubts about electing that crazy piece of shit.

But he brought on another self important A-hole as his VP the same as McCain. Most people on the fence ended up seeing Romney as an entitled, untrustworthy, elitist.
His naming of Ryan as his VP candidate made him look weak as it was generally assuming Ryan was forced upon him to placate the Teabaggers.
 

mongo18

A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke.
Really. Because that pretty much describes Obama to a T.

Haha wow, have you ever been in reality? It was Romney who told college kids that if they can't afford it they should just borrow the money from their parents. It was Romney who said he doesn't have to care about those 47% who think they are entitled to food. The guy can't even look comfortable in jeans, ffs. Obama saved the auto industry so that regular people could keep their jobs, Romney would have torn it down and scavenged the carcass, because that's all his great business pedigree has shown him capable of.

Romney being lectured by this arrogant idiot on foreign policy:


Wow, who does he think he is? The president? The arrogance!

Speaking of arrogance, how many times did we have to hear Romney and Ryan say "when we win they just need to get out of the way." Probably the best advice you've ever given, dipshits, shame you can't follow it.
 

sean miguel

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
In an earlier thread I made the comparison between Barack Obama and Ronaldus Maximus. That was not an apt comparison.
Democrats are running away in droves from that 41% job approval rating.
 

MustBeGood

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Haha wow, have you ever been in reality? It was Romney who told college kids that if they can't afford it they should just borrow the money from their parents. It was Romney who said he doesn't have to care about those 47% who think they are entitled to food. The guy can't even look comfortable in jeans, ffs. Obama saved the auto industry so that regular people could keep their jobs, Romney would have torn it down and scavenged the carcass, because that's all his great business pedigree has shown him capable of.

The domino effect of Detroit going under would of effected more then the Big three as they contract out to other suppliers. This would of multiplied job loss everywhere.

It was these Tea Party supporters that don't see that as they took the Big Government kool-aid and slammed it.
 

mongo18

A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke.
Well, that's still better than congressional democrats, who are doing better than congressional republicans. This has been the republicans whole plan for the last 6 years, it's blatantly obvious. Spoil everything, aim straight for the bottom and hope they drag the other side down too. Yes, Obama's approval rating is low, thanks in large part to the ceaseless lies coming from the right. In fact, it's so low it's only about twice as much as congressional republicans.
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
That's odd. The right is stupid and lie yet the intelligent left believe them enough to bring down his approval rating. Explain that.
 
Top