NAACP Blasts CNN for Lack of Diversity in Prime Time News

[maildude]

They can hire people for the evening news of any race, creed, color, gender, religion or handicap they want, as far as I'm concerned. I get my news off the Internet. :nanner:

 

[Neutron66]

It is exactly the same, you for some reason want to interpret it differently. And he is not just 'stating' it, he is arguing for it in a pretty unpleasant manner.

Dude, I'm not interpreting anything. I'm looking at both the actual words that were said and those you are posting. You're the one who's interpreting it to mean what you seem to want it to mean.

There's plenty about Fox News to bitch about. Try and stick to what they actually say and not what you think they mean (or what someone told you they mean).

 

[accountantNOT]

The U.S. is primarily a white Judeo Christian country. What's the big problem? To those who have a problem with it go to Venezuela, Iran, China, Zimbabwe, or SA. You'll have loads of laughs there.

Where in the constitution does it say that its a 'white Judeo Christian' country? And O'reilly didn't say 'judeo'.

What's wrong with that exactly? Is it wrong for Britain to be run White, agnostic men? Seeing as they make up the majority population and built the nation from the ground up.


Whites make up the lion's share of the population and have made the largest contribution in terms of law, business, science, industry, healthcare, education, infrastructure, private and public investment, writing, art, theater etc. etc.

What's wrong? This is what's wrong with his statement - He is opposed to immigration because he doesn't want the 'coloring of America'. If you don't think that's racist, then there is no argument. Not because of the economic effects or the effects on the resident population - only because of their race.

And you'd like the changing America to be -- the dominant people would be people of color?

 

[accountantNOT]

Dude, I'm not interpreting anything. I'm looking at both the actual words that were said and those you are posting. You're the one who's interpreting it to mean what you seem to want it to mean.

There's plenty about Fox News to bitch about. Try and stick to what they actually say and not what you think they mean (or what someone told you they mean).

So let's review

My statement

'The O'reilly factor' has said on the show that the US is a 'white Christian nation' and must be preserved as such.

Now O'reilly's statement.

America (nation) is run primarily by white, Christian men

But more than that, they want to change the white, Christian male power structure.

So when he is opposed to the change, it wouldn't mean that he wants to preserve the current structure. Do note that I wasn't quoting the part where I said 'preserve'.

And these statements were not in a vaccum, he was actually arguing for them pretty aggressively.

 

[Zolf J. Kimbly]

 

[Neutron66]

He is opposed to immigration

Dude, are you even paying attention?

He's against OPEN BORDERS. That is not the same as being against immigration.

Now O'reilly's statement.

America (nation) is run primarily by white, Christian men

But more than that, they want to change the white, Christian male power structure.

And once more, he's stating a fact about the current power structure in this country and the fact that there are people who oppose it.

At no point does he say that the white christian power structure must be preserved. You are totally making that up yourself.

Christ. The main thing that irritates me about this is you're forcing me to defend O'Reilly.

 

[accountantNOT]

Dude, are you even paying attention?

He's against OPEN BORDERS. That is not the same as being against immigration.

Actually you are the one not paying attention since he was discussing the Senate immigration bill , it was not about Open borders and there is no mention of open borders in the NYTimes article either which he was rallying against.

And in those clips, he was against 'immigration' because he doesn't want the current power structure changed - that was his main and only argument and not economic or anything else. It was purely along racial lines.

And once more, he's stating a fact about the current power structure in this country and the fact that there are people who oppose it.

He is not just stating it, he is arguing FOR it and pretty aggressively.

At no point does he say that the white christian power structure must be preserved. You are totally making that up yourself.

Again, I wasn't quoting him when I said preserved, he argues for keeping the same power structure (preserving) by opposing those nefarious 'lefty' plots.

 

[Neutron66]

/facepalm

I give up. It's bedtime.

 

[mindofmindcrime]

ain't it funny that FOX News has more diversity among their on-air staff than CNN?

 

[Deepcover]

I could have sworn I saw revamp protesting with Black Americans on CNN.

 

[Deepcover]

They should go after M&M's for not putting enough brown ones in the bags.

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

They can hire people for the evening news of any race, creed, color, gender, religion or handicap they want, as far as I'm concerned. I get my news off the Internet. :nanner:

Honestly, me too. I've got newspaper, radio, internet. I don't watch tv except for ESPN.

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

Where in the constitution does it say that its a 'white Judeo Christian' country? And O'reilly didn't say 'judeo'.



What's wrong? This is what's wrong with his statement - He is opposed to immigration because he doesn't want the 'coloring of America'. If you don't think that's racist, then there is no argument. Not because of the economic effects or the effects on the resident population - only because of their race.

And you'd like the changing America to be -- the dominant people would be people of color?

It's a de facto White Christian country, get over it.

 

[Zolf J. Kimbly]

It's a de facto White Christian country, get over it.

not for long...

:stir:

 

[Will E Worm]

not for long...

:stir:

You plan on changing that? :nono: We will start a war.


:ak47:

 

[BioDefenseGrad]

not for long...

:stir:

Oh really? What do you think will happen?

Whenever that projected date--White non-Hispanics will still be the largest ethnic group in the U.S. and guess what, white hispanics and white non-hispanics intermarry at perhaps the highest rate in the country.


This puts whites at the majority for decades to come, possibly forever.


I know anti-White freaks such as yourself don't like it, too bad.

 

[Zolf J. Kimbly]

You plan on changing that? :nono: We will start a war.


:ak47:

i dont have to do anything to change it

this country is turning brown and catholic without me doing a thing to either help or stop it

having numbers really means nothing

might have a few more non white prezzies, senators, governors, and mayors

worse case scenario everyone is running around speaking spanish

spanish is fuckin easy so no skin of my nose

aced that class and was high and sleep half the time

imagine what happens when i actually try

just think its funny so many white people are panicing their ass off over it

things change

you can either adapt or get swallowed up in the storm

Oh really? What do you think will happen?

Whenever that projected date--White non-Hispanics will still be the largest ethnic group in the U.S. and guess what, white hispanics and white non-hispanics intermarry at perhaps the highest rate in the country.


This puts whites at the majority for decades to come, possibly forever.


I know anti-White freaks such as yourself don't like it, too bad.

forever is a long time bud

the population of this country isn't even the same as it was 500 years ago

how do u possibly think it can maintain 1 course until the end of time?

there is no telling what is gonna happen

that super volcano under yellowstone could go off tomorrow and reduce the population to ZERO for all we know

 

[Supafly]

Since when did 'diversity' = 'African American'?

Last time I looked 'diverse' covered more than one thing. For instance 'a diverse culture', might include: Chinese, Japanese, Russian, Indian, Samoan, Latino/a, Egyptian, Lithuanian, aboriginal' peoples etc etc.

Talk about a 'black and white' view of the damn world.

Someone at NAACAAAAPPPP needs a dictionary.

Sorry, dicktshunree

Word.

My exact first thought, too.

I would advise an example of this mix:

1. All-American white, blonde, the high school quarterback type, male
2. Former blonde high school darling and cheerleader
3. Fat black woman, oprah-style
4. Latino, George Lopez style
5. Innuit with heavy spasticity
6. Jewish transgender midget
7. Palestinian siamese twins, albinos
8. Chinese with an IQ of ~ 65 (Hey, there have to be representatives of the stupid, too)
9. Koko, the talking gorilla. Animal diversity!
10. David Hasselhoff (I am german, I will vote for him on everything)

There, problem solved :1orglaugh