So you tried to sound smart, but only continued to show an inability to debate against the fact that she advertises as a tease, members pay for a tease, and therefore they get a tease.
Holy shit! She works a job for money? Since when did people start doing that!??!?! Where was this revelation before I spent my own money on anything!??!?!
She is edging material. Your definition of "tease" is just that: YOUR definition of tease. She's not denying anyone sex, because she doesn't promise anyone sex. She's teasing with her body. She's showing people almost everything they want to see, gives them a little peek of it all every once in a while, and keeps people coming back. It's not about sex, it's about her body.
She's teasing. Just because you want her to do more doesn't mean she's owes you anything. If she were cheap with her product, people just stop paying for it. If people felt they were getting ripped off, they stop buying. If she came off as mean, hundreds of thousands of people wouldn't be so damned fond of her.
Your opinion is in the slim, SLIM minority, and based on...well...nothing but nonsense. You try to cover it with a vocabulary that isn't your own to come off as intelligent, when really your argument is invalid. She says she's a tease, she teases people with her body, and leaves it at that. Like a dancer at a juice bar. Look, but don't touch. Believe it or not, Nikki is far cheaper than one of those...
So take your whining and leave, and let the people here to enjoy, enjoy. If you're going to pull a, "I can be here if I want," or, "opinions...blah blah...freedom of speech..." then apply the same consideration to others who don't share your (wrong) viewpoint.
1) Re: Trying to sound smart. I didn't try to sound smart. I tried and do try to avoid seeming illiterate. I have have never gotten a handle on comma splices in that I don't really understand how to use them properly. I'm sure that shows through. Plus I'm dysgraphic so I tend to write things the way I hear them instead of how they are used (or not used) in the common vernacular. I also drop words frequently. Otherwise, this is the way I speak and write; I have been told that it's odd - sorry if you don't like it. Other useful tidbit: I grew up in a small town; was home schooled. I learned to read from the Encyclopedia Britannica 1956 edition and a old Webster's Dictionary, circa unknown. If you think it's (my vocabulary) a put on that's your prerogative however baseless.
2) Re: Advertising as "Tease". I contested the definition of "tease" being used disingenuously by Nikki. You haven't exactly provided a counter argument, you've just reiterated your previous argument and said of mine, "that's not argument." We could do this forever if you like. I prefer to leave it to others to decide whether they agree with me. Also, let's be clear, you disagreed with my opinion of the last video as "lame" which is not exactly a "live and let live" response. You took issue with it. Funny that. I presume you only responded because I called you out on your definition of "sleaze-ball" behaviour - to which you have still given no answer. So you are saying that it's ok to heap endless - in my opinion, undue - praise on this woman, but any complaint (regardless of it's validity) is forbidden?… I'm looking for some vocabulary that would properly describe this type of sycophantic hypocrisy…something you might feel is truly "my own"…Wait. I got it… Bullshit.
3) Re: Money, and things we do for it. Making an honest buck is different than making money your only focus. Someone who only cares about money is likely to make more money if they sell a cheap product. Like you said, however, this only works if you either, a) have very stupid/low self-esteem customers, or b) you can bring in new customers faster than you lose the old ones. Nikki has a lot of return customers and a lot of new customers. I would wager that she has a TON of turnover as well. Luckily, the ones that stick around aren't choosey, perhaps even a bit foolish and/or desperate. Also, she advertises well and creates the assuring illusion that she goes nude or soon will be - hence the new customers. The main point I made about Nikki and money was that she sells a lot of inferior product on the supposition of a superior product at some point down the road. She gives us wood nickels while keeping our gold ducats to herself. More than 8 years of this behaviour is not "protecting your brand" it's what I said: being cheap.
4) Re: Wanting the body, not the sex. Are you serious? Is that what you actually meant? Do you want to paint her or immortalize her in stone? Surely not. You want her body for the sex. Symmetry and line are not "edging" material in themselves, they are a representation through which sexual desire and expression take form. You stroke to it because you want to get to the fucking. Come on man…
5) Re: Owing me something. I didn't say that she owes me anything. I implied that she owes all of us who have spent time and money on her. She pretends as though she will cross over to harder material and then doesn't. You call it a tease. I call it a bait and switch.
6) Re: Nikki being mean. She speaks nicely, smiles sweetly, bats her eyes and so on, but when it comes to playing beta suckers like yourself out she's manipulative. The fact that you can't see that is unfortunate but typical.
7) Re: My opinion being marginal or an outlier. To be honest I really don't know if it is true or not. Do you know this to be true? If so, how? I am voicing my opinion because it's mine and I hope that others may share it and take some comfort in knowing that they are not the only ones who feel mislead and fed up with her behaviour.
Good talk beets.
Best,
B
I mean I wouldn't but we could…:stir: I have never done anything like this before. PM me. K?