• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

Now see... THIS is getting a bit much!

QBall1970

Banned
04:00 HRS / C.S.T.
27 JAN 2005

I just read this in this morning edition of the New York Times... I'll also include a link to the story.

ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and KEN BELSON said:
... SBC Communications, the second-largest regional phone company in the nation, is in talks to buy AT&T for more than $16 billion, according to executives close to the negotiations.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the same scenario that caused the original MA BELL to break up back in '79 or so? This is ridiculous, if you ask me. GREED. Nothing but greed. SBC has already gobbled up two of the regional Bell local networks down here within the past four years and now they're shooting to take over ATT.

And what's even funnier is the fact that ATT not even just finished inking the deal to merge with Cingular Wireless! And to think, when I worked for MCI Telecommunications back in '96, ATT was the nation's largest and most feared telecommunications giant. Sad things is, MCI Telecomm. was the very reason why MA BELL broke up in the first place and all the baby Bells split up... and enabled us as consumers to choose our local and long distance carriers.

Any comments?

Here's the direct link to the article:

SBC Said To Be In Talks To Buy AT&T
 

QBall1970

Banned
For those who prefer not to sign up as guests of The New York Times, here's the article in its entirety:

SBC Said To Be In Talks To Buy AT&T said:
By ANDREW ROSS SORKIN and KEN BELSON / Published: 27 January 2005


SBC Said To Be In Talks To Buy AT&T

SBC Communications, the second-largest regional phone company in the nation, is in talks to buy AT&T for more than $16 billion, according to executives close to the negotiations.

A deal, if reached, would be the final chapter in the 120-year history of AT&T, the first technological giant of the modern age and the original model for telecommunications companies worldwide. A deal would be a reunion of sorts, putting back together some of the largest pieces of the Ma Bell telephone monopoly, which was broken up in 1984.

Advertisement

The talks, which the executives described as "fluid" and "very, very sensitive" would unite SBC, a Baby Bell with some 50 million local-line customers, with AT&T, its much-diminished former parent.

AT&T, which only two decades ago ranked among the nation's very largest companies, is a shadow of its former self, focusing almost exclusively on corporate customers. Last year, AT&T said it would no longer market itself to its traditional retail customers.

Still, the executives cautioned that the talks could very well collapse. Indeed, AT&T has been in talks before. In 2003, negotiations between the company and BellSouth fell apart at an advanced stage when BellSouth saw how weak AT&T's prospects were. The executives involved in the current talks said that many issues, including a final price, had yet to be resolved.

Spokesmen for the two companies declined to comment.

The talks come as the telecommunications landscape has shifted from traditional fixed-line service to faster-growing, higher-margin businesses like wireless, broadband and corporate services. And with pricing wars continuing, telecommunications companies are looking to merge or risk being put out of business.

In theory, SBC and AT&T have complementary technology. SBC has a strong presence in California, Texas and Illinois, although, as with all the Bell companies, its fixed-line business has slid as customers use their cellphones more.

SBC has also made a strong push to sell broadband lines to consumers and is expanding its fiber optic network to provide video services in the coming year or two. The company also resells satellite television service from the DISH Network.

AT&T, on the other hand, has the largest international fiber network and the deepest client list of major corporations, which are considered valuable because they buy services in bulk. AT&T is also a major provider to the government and to companies that operate globally.

While SBC continues to grow slowly thanks to demand for its high-speed Internet lines, AT&T's business is expected to shrink about 15 percent this year. It is trapped in a vicious price war with its main rival, MCI. Verizon Communications, the largest regional Bell company, and SBC have also started marketing heavily to small businesses.

Regulators would be unlikely to block a merger given AT&T's diminished role in the industry. The company suffered a setback last year when the Bells won the right to raise fees they charge companies like AT&T for access to their local networks. One result of that was the decision last July to no longer market local phone service to residential consumers. AT&T now has about 25 million residential customers and about 3 million corporate customers

Despite its woes, AT&T has worked hard to cut costs, reduce debts and write down the value of its assets. The moves have made the company, even with its problems, more attractive to companies in search of the big corporate clients that AT&T has.

In the fourth quarter, AT&T's profit rose 84 percent, to $625 million, beating Wall Street's estimates. The jump came mostly because of cost-cutting efforts, including a 23 percent reduction of its work force last year.

SBC reported its fourth-quarter results yesterday, saying its sales rose as profits fell in its fourth quarter

SBC, based in San Antonio, said it earned 23 cents a share in the quarter ended Dec. 31. The company said that figure would have been 34 cents if not for one-time costs, including severance payments and expenses from the $41 billion acquisition of AT&T Wireless by its Cingular Wireless venture.

In the period a year ago, SBC earned 27 cents a share.

SBC said its fourth-quarter operating revenue was $10.3 billion, compared with $10 billion a year ago. It attributed the growth to the addition of 425,000 high-speed Internet lines and a considerable slowdown in the erosion of its traditional telephone business. Edward E. Whitacre Jr., SBC's chief executive, has said repeatedly that he is more focused on dealing with Cingular, which it owns with BellSouth.

Mr. Whitacre, like his counterpart at BellSouth, Duane Ackerman, are known for their cautious approach to investing and prudent use of their companies' money.

Still, according to industry analysts, AT&T's chief executive, David W. Dorman, has been eager to sell the company and perhaps, with the company now leaner, he may have found a buyer.

Matt Richtel contributed reporting for this article.
 

lightning

Officially Checked Overweight Dude from Jersey
Being a small business owner, I actually welcome this. I have been burned in the past trusting some small company that promised me low rates, then raised them after a few months. I went back to SBC, and while they charge way to much to advertise in the books, the service has greatly improved in the last 2 years. They went through major customer service training and it shows. The phone companies don't seem anywhere near as corrupt as the cable companies. Now don't get me started on them. :mad: $50.00/ month for basic cable, Bastards!
 

foxycougar

Never argue with a fool. People might not know the difference.
The ATT Wireless and ATT are two different companies, they have nothing to do with each other, just thought I would let you know, lol. (At least that's what I've been told by someone who works for the Wireless)
 
Top