• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

Obama admin. lifts sanctions against Russians linked to Iran

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
True, Israel is pretty good at that, but I wonder if our side sort of lets them get away with it as long as they don't get too greedy or something. I'm pretty sure they got the design for their nukes from us. :rofl:

Now, if Russia, which as the Soviet Union was the craddle of communism, as you say isn't interested in going back, why do liberals still want to try it here?!?! :mad: There's a nice tropical paradise 90 miles south of Miami where they can move and help the bearded walking corpse run things over there. Come on, libs!! Move to Cuba, they got beautiful women there!! And extremely nice beaches for the equal enjoyment of all the proletariat!! :D

Wow. And to think I just repped you for another post! :rolleyes:

Saying that liberals are communists is like saying that conservatives are fascists. This type of labeling is divisive and, well, just plain wrong. It also makes you appear to be a prejudiced narrow-minded asshole which, I am pretty sure, you really aren't. Are you? :dunno:
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Ahmadinejhad or whatever his name is has probably already contacted them and offered them " an offer they can't refu$e".

Yeah probably. Let's all speculate the living shit out of this since we are all privy to what is going on behind the scenes in this diplomacy. Or perhaps do some of us hope for these negotiations to fail for some other politically-motivated reason?

Nahhhhh....no one would be that much of a partisan asshole, would they? :dunno:

Also, I'm quite impressed! You actually spelled his name right, MP! The cut and paste function is quite useful, no? :D
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
Yes it is!
:thumbsup:

But I'm just goin by what President Clinton said.
If Bill said they are a threat, I gotta believe him.
He said Saddam was a serious threat and must be stopped by force too.
But then again he also said " I did not have sexual contact with that woman".
So who's to say which is right and which is an illusion?

But fuck it, lift the stupid sanctions, no skin off my sack.
Just keep an eye on those Russian son of a bitches, thats all.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
^
Oh boy....the ultimate arch-conservative fallback: play the Clinton card. Extremely weak, pal. :bs:

On a good note, your last two sentences are the most intelligent things I've seen you write in a long time. That's exactly my stance on this issue as well, my friend! Well done! :thumbsup:
 

Hot Mega

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Yes it is!
:thumbsup:

But I'm just goin by what President Clinton said.
If Bill said they are a threat, I gotta believe him.
He said Saddam was a serious threat and must be stopped by force too.
But then again he also said " I did not have sexual contact with that woman".
So who's to say which is right and which is an illusion?

But fuck it, lift the stupid sanctions, no skin off my sack.
Just keep an eye on those Russian son of a bitches, thats all.

Clinton said no such thing about Saddam needing to be stopped by force...at least not a the US's hands.
 

CurtJa

I know how to use the search button!
To think that Iran WOULDN'T get what it needs from Russia with these sanctions intact is quite naive. Diplomacy is necessary, even if it is entirely masquerade.

"Both the U.S. and Russia are still spying on and trying to screw each other and they will continue to do so as long as their interests are in conflict to each other"

Absolutely. Yet we live now in the day and age when few countries are not spying on each other (allies included), and hence the cold war mentality and tactics are obsolete. Those (and there are many of them) who think we are still in a one-on-one match with another super power are missing the fact that what we essentially have today is a massive bar room brawl. That is why the "bring em on" bluster doesn't work in practice -- it's akin to sticking your neck out and letting the whole room take a whack at you.
 

Facetious

Moderated
Well, let them take him with them :D

f_da4xqaxdtdm_7b267aa.jpg
 

JayJohn85

Banned
Good lord no one's surrendering here Georges. It's called diplomacy. It's a high stakes chess game. I realize you right wingers have lost any sense of its importance - God knows Bush was fucking clueless in that arena, with disastrous results. But amazingly enough it has a long long history of at times bearing fruit in delicate situations where brute force can't.



You mean we should "Shock and Awe" them again?
How that work out in Bush's two wars? :rolleyes:
The only thing shocking was our inability to kill the ONE MAN we were after, despite dropping millions of tons of bombs in his direction.

1. You cant shock and awe them cause they likely will have viable nukes soon....Also I would suspect their army is actually better than Iraq's

2. Unfortunately right wingers can wet dream all they want about taking the hard line all the time....Reality of the situation is that Russia is still powerful and they are good pals with the emerging powerhouse "China"

3. Queue the "we will kick all their asses bull" You may have been in a two front war with iraq/afghanistan but they sure as hell aint forces to be reckoned with. Plus you had a global coalition, Quite frankly you gotta make use of diplomacy, Fact is before China even started to rapidly modernize it beat ya's outta north korea. And ya know what its probably a good thing, Need to balance the meglamaniac elements of your government if no one could stand in the way or had any chance god knows what the fack you guys would do.
 

roronoa3000

Banned
1. You cant shock and awe them cause they likely will have viable nukes soon....Also I would suspect their army is actually better than Iraq's

2. Unfortunately right wingers can wet dream all they want about taking the hard line all the time....Reality of the situation is that Russia is still powerful and they are good pals with the emerging powerhouse "China"

3. Queue the "we will kick all their asses bull" You may have been in a two front war with iraq/afghanistan but they sure as hell aint forces to be reckoned with. Plus you had a global coalition, Quite frankly you gotta make use of diplomacy, Fact is before China even started to rapidly modernize it beat ya's outta north korea. And ya know what its probably a good thing, Need to balance the meglamaniac elements of your government if no one could stand in the way or had any chance god knows what the fack you guys would do.
Damn foreigners and their video games.
Remember fuckers, we have Chuck Norris and Jack Bauer
 

Facetious

Moderated
Facetious there was a time when you atleast tried to be "fair and balanced" :rolleyes:

I think if you're trolling Breitbart for info/topics, my how the mighty have fallen...:rolleyes:



“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.” - Saul Alinsky "Rules for Radicals" :1orglaugh


If you had opened the link you would have noticed ''AP'', but NO! the far left democrats won't read anything unless they know well ahead that it's something that they agree with.

In any event, I don't know a whole lot about this ''Bartbr...'' whoopsy! let's try this again, ''BREITBART'' source, so tell me, is it a ''teabagger'' site?

:1orglaugh You guys and your little labels, you crack me up!





Facetious can't see beyond a 1950s red scare mentality
Again, Alinsky-esque strategy . . Chide, humiliate & ridicule.
It's incomprehensible to him that we actually have big ticket interests in common with the Russians and Chinese.

Big ticket interests are fine, just don't rescind the sanctions preventing
A - mad - jihad from obtaining long range, non defensive intended, military grade missiles.
 

Facetious

Moderated
Detained hikers stir memories of Iran hostage crisis

Tehran could attempt to use the Americans as bargaining chips in its bid to build nuclear weapons

story


I don't give a flippin' $#@% if this story came out of the ''atheist times'' :1orglaugh, I judge it on it's individual merit. Stop being so closed minded! :p

Now let's see if we can connect some dots . . :D

The word I'm hearing is that Iran is now talking about releasing said captives . . . more to follow, I'm sure.
 
Top