philly i'm just wondering if you
have an arguments beside straw men, red herrings, and
argument against the person of the abusive type....
by the way all of these a fallacies of relevance 
and many republicans rail against porn
When I was living in New Orleans, I noticed a lot of the dumbest people started using a different way of saying the usual dumb things...a kinda ghetto fad as it was...big words.
People would string a lot of large multisyllable words together, stating the usual incoherent dribble but with a flourish of eloquent language to cover the lack of actual cohesive thought.
I seem to detect that in your method of discourse...you use big long words and refer to
real thinkers, making pretty incoherent statements while misusing syntax and making no real point.
It's an obvious thing...sad, but you think you're pretty smart the whole time.
That post was, as usual, incoherent.
The only thing clearly stated was silly... "and many republicans rail against porn".
Yeah, so?
Many Democrats, Libertarians, Pagans, and anyone else who disapproves of porn "rails" against it. Some people rail against double parking...that's not a specific political platform.
It's print...not actual conversation.
You type this drivel, look it over and feel real good about yourself, and post it with plenty of time to correct any mistakes or misstatements. Which obviously are not apparent to you. A telling flaw...