Obama bows to king of Saudi Arabia?

[Legzman]

Using another cultures tradition during something as simple as a greeting should be common practise.

But no.

He's quite obviously a terrorist of some sort.

thats exactly what I thought

 

[don_equis]

would it have been so bad if it was Burger King instead.. just a lil joke..here world we give you the most gifted most adored president of the U.S. Mr B.H.O!

 

[Philbert]

It's harder and harder to not see you as yet another right winger who can only whine and complain, yet offer nothing in terms of solutions. Have you not seen the latest poll showing that majority of Americans siding with Obama while the GOP's approval rating slipped even further? You claim of



hasn't happened yet, if so mind showing us the numbers supporting your claim? The reality is the American people is still giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, because they are just seeing how the economy is bottoming itself out and it's only a matter of time before the job losses stopped and reverse course. Guys like you are afraid what may happen if the economy rebounded under Obama's watch. You are using outrageous rhetorics to hide your extreme distaste for Obama and I don't think any rational person is fooled by it. Say what you want Phil once the economy is back on track again I better see you coming here and eating crow for the world to see.

I did post actual figures...You Missed it or closed your eyes so as to not see what makes you wrong.
Your claims aren't backed by anything but wishes...not too rational a person, I guess.
" Say what you want Phil once the economy is back on track again I better see you coming here and eating crow for the world to see."
Or what...you'll whine some more?:rofl:

 

[NavyBlue]

I did post actual figures...you missed it or closed your eyes so as to not see what makes you wrong.
Your claims aren't backed by anything but wishes...not too rational a person, I guess.
" Say what you want Phil once the economy is back on track again I better see you coming here and eating crow for the world to see."
Or what...you'll whine some more?:rofl:

Pfft.. I was going to add a "not" in there.. but I digress.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/03/18/obama.poll/index.html?iref=newssearch

The poll also suggests that a majority of those questioned, 58 percent, feel that the president's programs are just about right for the country. Around 36 percent say Obama's proposals are too liberal, and 5 percent say they are not liberal enough.

Poll: Unemployment is top economic concern
On the issues, 59 percent say they approve of how the president is handling the economy, 57 percent like how Obama's dealing with health care, 63 percent approve of how he's handling energy policy and 65 percent back him when it comes to education reform.

I know the polls can change day by day, but right now the majority of americans approve of Obama's handling of the economy and other issues, and not

lots of previous supporters are beginning to see the obvious direction things are going in...buyers remorse and nervous loss of confidence are beginning to show.

like you said.

 

[don_equis]

Obama won the U.S. Presidency which means he has the right to the seat unless he is removed from office after a Senate conviction for committing "high crimes and misdemeanors", resigns, loses a re-election or is term limited after 8 years of service.

Far too many, so called "real Americans" have no clue what it means to stand on the principles and ideals for which our country was founded. They seem to think the U.S. should only be about what they want in their little world.

In the U.S. we don't try and overthrow a president because we believe he extended a courtesy we disagree with. We vote when we disagree with a leader...and Americans have given ransom and blood in Iraq purportedly to give them that same right....Yeah, "how soon we forget".

True he got elected so it's time for him to start acting like the President of this great nation and to stop campaigning and liyinmg about the greatness of islam in America.

Our founding father fought the tyranny that repesented in the King, who is he to change years of tradition of not bowing down to no one, yeah I guess his muslim tides are way too strong.

This president is garbage he wayy worse than Bush, because nothign sticks to him, there;s no longer a free press they are way up this "rookie" ass.

What he needs to do is get to the center and stop his nonsense of hating and blaming everything on America, he's the damn president for crying out loud, will somebody remind him of that?

 

[titsrock]

So lame it boggles the mind...can you say "paranoid"?
It sounds so whiny to claim a massive group of loyal Americans exists who just want to fuck the country their children live and grow in, whose families are part and parcel of the fabric of this nation for hundreds of years and millions of dead, so they can win an election. Not only paranoid, whiny, and lower than childish, but la-la land quality in logic.

Let us just dissect this part of your rant. Is it not unreasonable to think that Republicans are actually in "govt" for nothing more than to get rich and to fuck over people who are not as rich and successful as they are?

Look at how corrupt and incompetent Gov't has been these past 8 years. It was Dubya who dismantled FEMA and other support orgs, created some "giant" useless, unnecessary called "The Dept of Homeland Security" an org so ineffective that he let New Orleans get *destroyed* on his watch with much more than a smug "shrug of the shoulders":dunno: The Dept of Homeland Security seems to be nothing more than an ineffective org bent on "securing" airports from terrorists. Hmmm. I kind of think that the terrorists have "played" the airport card and, therefore, they just probably aren't going to try the same tactics over again. Unless they come to the conclusion that we really are stupid and have zero discipline and intelligence and we are "ripe" for more airport shenanigans. Wouldn't that be embarrassing?

How is it that it is in our nation's 'best interests" and our "children's" best interest to keep flushing billions down to toilet in Iraq and Afghanistan? Or are these expenditures acceptable because they're Republican "ideas" but Democratic ideas about--serving the needs of Americans at home--are bad and a wasteful expenditure of money:dunno:

If we don't "fix" healthcare and education and actually address global warming...what kind of nation are you/we going to leave those precious kids you seem to now care about? :dunno:

Or, is it in the national interest to have some ongoing war so that all of our kids can go off and fight to show off our "American Pride"...because Americans are the biggist badasses on the planet, eh?

Republican presidents have generally done nothing but leave the nation worse off than when they find it. The Bush presidents have been the worst presidents, collectively, in the nation's history. Both W and HW seem to be able to do nothing but steer the nation right into deep recessions and Middle East wars. Granted, HW atleast had a legit reason to send the country to war in Iraq. W couldn't even find a legit reason.

THe less we listen to Republican politicians the better....we already rejected Republicans en masse and threw them out of office. I don't see too many people saying "Gee, wouldn't it be great to have Republicans in charge right now..."

Nobody is dumb enough to go there...

 

[Hot Mega]

What he needs to do is get to the center and stop his nonsense of hating and blaming everything on America, he's the damn president for crying out loud, will somebody remind him of that?

Hmmm, try this; Take a break from listening to the GOPer echo chamber for awhile and I'm guessing these things won't bother you as much.

But let me ask you, were you as bothered by Bush mismanaging Afghanistan so bad that he ended up crawling around Europe begging for help after all his ballsy huffing?

I personally think the way he's botched these wars against essentially disarmed countries has done more to tarnish the image of U.S. might than anything since Vietnam.

But hey, as long as he did appear to bow in public....lets bring him back

 

[don_equis]

Hmmm, try this; Take a break from listening to the GOPer echo chamber for awhile and I'm guessing these things won't bother you as much.

But let me ask you, were you as bothered by Bush mismanaging Afghanistan so bad that he ended up crawling around Europe begging for help after all his ballsy huffing?

I personally think the way he's botched these wars against essentially disarmed countries has done more to tarnish the image of U.S. might than anything since Vietnam.

But hey, as long as he did appear to bow in public....lets bring him back

man will you stop acussing people of loving bush anytime anyone disagree with Obama...this man is garbage worse than bush we need to ask for better more qualified ppl from the parties in this country instead of going for "hope" and "change" and stop with the republican vs democrats status quo.

but since you mentioned bush i betcha that if it was him who had bowed oh my the media would have been all over him as in "oil man bush bows to the allmighty opec"

so tell me how was our image tarnished exactly?

 

[E-Ann-Hilden]

I think you should bow to no man, but among politics and some grace that is involved with that, oh well.... Doesnt mean Obama is in his service in the least bit, unless gas price jump, then again maybe not..

Overall I could care less....

 

[Hot Mega]

so tell me how was our image tarnished exactly?

What do you think it says of the U.S. that we have a POTUS who starts of with this, "you're either with us or against us" nonsense and we'll do what we want when we want.....Then go crawling to others begging for troops and money to bail you out?

It's naive to negotiate with terrorists..while you're paying them not to shoot at you in the "Sunni Triangle". For starters....

That doesn't bother you just a little bit??

 

[bodie54]

I was very disturbed by the image of him bowing to a King.......fuck that. We revolted against a monarchy to begin this country......

I was disturbed by it too, particularly in light of the proud, manly, no nonsense, All American way our previous president engaged the Saudi king.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8LU7Up5exQ

I am not saying he should be a prick to .......a firm handshake a cool look in the eye would be more appropriate.

You're picturing perhaps, something along these lines?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjtfaLtLT7s&feature=related

That's a firm hand hold.....errr, I mean shake, if ever I've seen one (and the kiss was nice too :lovecoupl).