Roughly ten years ago, there was a (very) limited effort to employ people of my ilk in certain government agencies, or at least to use them to review certain programs, mainly with an eye toward waste, fraud and abuse. Especially at companies or organizations with entrenched cultures, people in my profession are usually hated. You get used to being called a member of the S.S., a Nazi, Herr Fuhrer and all manner of things. And that's because protecting sacred cows is the rule of the day at places like that. And people in my profession are typically pretty agnostic when it comes to things like that. If the village needs to eat, then you kill the sacred cow, if necessary. It all comes down to where the data leads you. A friend of mine was offered a position at a government contractor that dealt with the Defense Dept. But once he learned that he would be expected to turn a blind eye to the things that they didn't want touched, despite what the data might show, he turned down the job.
No offense intended, but people tend to believe whatever makes them most comfortable. At times I'm sure that I do that too. But when it comes to making real, meaningful and realistic spending cuts (sacred cows be damned), I've just not seen evidence that either party is capable of doing what needs to be done in order to get us (truly) on the right fiscal path, while still spending on the projects that do indeed make the nation better and stronger (education reforms, infrastructure and IT spending, etc.).
It doesn't hurt that I have a high credit in 7 figures and have satisfied those debts. Aside from a Boeing Dreamliner, there are not many things I couldn't get approved for. I am credit obssessed much like your uncle.
No wonder they needed to be bailed out.Well Rey if I am going to hitch my wagon to a sacred cow then at least it is going to be a constitutionally mandated one. Capiche?
Si, io capisco. Ma, uh... but, will we still be friends if I shoot your sacred cow and feed the village? Nothing personal. It's just what people like me do.
Si, io capisco. Ma, uh... but, will we still be friends if I shoot your sacred cow and feed the village? Nothing personal. It's just what people like me do.
so because we differ in opinions, and you arent actually very open-minded AT ALL, and as well have not offered any original ideas or concepts yourself. yet you have to be harsh and vulgar and personal towards me?
How very christian of you counselor.
Miss banker is hoping that she can make some backend money on the car loan and it is considered a short term deal. The timberland purchase was not.
what's wrong with in your face? I know you guys don't like to be asked to explain your political positions because most of them are the old "because I say so!" shit you inherited from your parents. No real explanation other than you say so. I would lOVE to read some in your face shit from your side. I enjoy having my opinions challenged and questioned because then I can maybe rethink where I'm at and why I believe what I do. You on the other hand absolutely refuse to acknowledge anything wrong with your shrinking party and instead make a toddler rebuttal with "But so and so is doing it too!"
I don't set out to offend anyone with the political threads I post. I can't say I haven't intended to offend some fuck sticks who make stupid comments though. If you are offended by a post on a porn site message board then maybe your opinions and stances are a little more fragile than you realize. Just like if I made a post that was titled "All piece of shit dead beat dads should die!" the only people offended would be dead beat dads I would presume.
Get some thicker skin counselor if you wanna have political and religious debates. You obviously enjoy the sparring sessions here, so why get your panties in a bunch about it?
More likely, she couldn't understand the land purchase, because it included selling assets (the timber) off the land while the loan was still in place, plus it was considered a commercial loan. The term of that loan would have been five years. I was prepared to pay a funding fee, interest only, a balloon at the end of the term and as much as 25% of the proceeds from the timber sales going toward the principle. The car loan was pretty straight forward: fully amortized with no prepayment penalty - just a standard, vanilla auto loan. But it was for seven years. I was never involved in consumer banking, so I don't know what they earn from doing car loans. But I expect a (real) private banker to understand how to do more complex things. What if I'd wanted to use a mortgage I hold as collateral on this or some other loan? Would she have know how to value it? Doubtful. For a car loan, I could have talked to any loan officer at any bank (or off the internet) sitting in a cubicle. She's not a real private banker. I go to the BofA U.S. Trust office in Charlotte when I need to see someone who is more than a glorified teller. Those kids know their stuff.
Well Clinton did a good job so whatever he did worked. He had willing republicans to work with but that breed is now extinct.