• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

Report: Intel agencies claim Obama circumvented U.S. Intel and used Brits to spy on Trump

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
"Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command," Napolitano said.

 

xfire

@ChrisFreemanX
Smart move by the Trump Administration because The Donald would have access to any and all U.S. Intel that would incriminate the former President, Muslim bastard that he is.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
"Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command," Napolitano said.


He also wiretapped James Rosen of Fox News. And Sheryl Atkisson of CBS.
Both have been confirmed.

Fox News is as reliable as any other MSM sources you rely on. In many case more so.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Smart move by the Trump Administration because The Donald would have access to any and all U.S. Intel that would incriminate the former President, Muslim bastard that he is.

That's a cute response and all but British intelligence are the ones making this known.

They will be able to confirm their access to U.S. Intel. I said by the summer we'd have dirt on Obama.

It looks like we are on course.
 

xfire

@ChrisFreemanX
That's a cute response and all but British intelligence are the ones making this known.

They will be able to confirm their access to U.S. Intel. I said by the summer we'd have dirt on Obama.

It looks like we are on course.

Nothing cute about it.
 

Straight Shooter

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Stories with anonymous sources are not credible if they're negative against Trump. Stories with anonymous sources are credible if they're negative against Obama. Sound logic. Fuck outttttttttttta here :rofl2::rofl:
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Stories with anonymous sources are not credible if they're negative against Trump. Stories with anonymous sources are credible if they're negative against Obama. Sound logic. Fuck outttttttttttta here :rofl2::rofl:

There is just a slight difference in information emanated from the unnamed sources.

Some are illegal leaks.

The information about the British agencies are not illegal leaks.
 

xfire

@ChrisFreemanX
Did Kellyanne say microwave ovens specifically?

No, she didn't but it doesn't matter, it's called directing the narrative that's why Steve Bannon is where he is.

And Protip*, don't discuss that second part of what you posted immediately above unless you want black helicopters hovering your house and Secret Service agents knocking at your door. I could relate a personal anecdote as it pertains, but I'm not going to because of the previous sentence.
 

xfire

@ChrisFreemanX
Putting her out there where she makes silly comments isn't helpful to the Administration, but I do hope Trump continues to give her a long leash.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Putting her out there where she makes silly comments isn't helpful to the Administration, but I do hope Trump continues to give her a long leash.

Obama survived dumbassery on his end too.

She's a good strategist. But not good winging it.
 
Top