Shooting Private Videos With Pornstars

[Jeep!]

What you're saying is sort of like saying I could go into the street with a dodgy 'tache and pretend I'm in a cop movie, because with Hollywood there's no point in actually filming it.
I think it'd be a cool achievement, something to show your buddies at a party or maybe a good present for someone if you were able to make them one with their favourite star, provided you were cool with spending the cash on it.

 

[assholebythedoor]

I would disagree. The people have the right to know. That is why pornstars are pieces of shit as you had explain in the doggybag.
And As I had said, not all pornstars are pieces of shit. Which ones are?
and which ones arent? I don't have a list of names.
But I have saw the ones who have done shit that only a piece who was a piece of shit would do.

 

[Jeep!]

The right to know? It's not some huge secret if someone shoots a private film, but you seem to make it out like someone's being betrayed by it.

 

[assholebythedoor]

How is it not some huge secret?

 

[Jeep!]

It's as much a huge secret as commissioning a painting by an artist you like or getting a guest speaker at a private function. It's not some huge treason or anything, just someone wanting to make their own film and hiring known talent to do so.

 

[assholebythedoor]

I dont see it happening. You would have to cut the bullshit.
Being inflicted as so much as it is.

 

[Jeep!]

I'm really struggling to see this 'bullshit' that needs cut.

 

[Sicario]

For porn to be legal, at least here in California, the person paying the model/performer cannot be the same person that is receiving the sexual gratification from her.

So adult/internet companies that shoot these P.O.V genres have two people working the cam? I've seen a lot of P.O.V stuff and the camera guy is definitely receiving sexual gratification from the talent. Trick editing? :dunno:

 

[Jeep!]

They can be the dude with the camera, just not the guy who actually hands over the money.

 

[pornlaw]

So adult/internet companies that shoot these P.O.V genres have two people working the cam? I've seen a lot of P.O.V stuff and the camera guy is definitely receiving sexual gratification from the talent. Trick editing? :dunno:

As long as the producer and the male talent are not one in the same, then it is legal. However for the most part, they way POV is shot in Porn Valley, most of the POV shooters do pay talent directly.

The LA DA just has never prosecuted anyone for it.