tartanterrier
Is somewhere outhere.
Hmm, dying in Scotland or Libya, which is worse? I can't decide.![]()
If you had to pick one,where would it be???
Hmm, dying in Scotland or Libya, which is worse? I can't decide.![]()
If you had to pick one,where would it be???![]()
Humanity to a mass murderer?
Please get of your high horse.
This guy should have been put to death on television for the world to see.
whoever is responsible should be hung.
The Sunday Times of 23 October 2005 reported that Lord Fraser of Carmyllie, who drew up the 1991 indictment against the two accused Libyans and issued warrants for their arrest, had now cast doubt upon the reliability of the main prosecution witness, Tony Gauci. Lord Fraser criticised the Maltese shopkeeper for inter alia being "not quite the full shilling" and an "apple short of a picnic".
Professor Hans Köchler, who was appointed as one of the UN observers by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, criticised the trial in his report and evaluation. Köchler observed that the trial had been politically influenced in breach of legal traditions and principles, such as the Rule of law.[21] In an interview for the BBC on the day the first appeal was rejected, he described the court's decision as a "spectacular miscarriage of justice".[22][23]
In a radio programme entitled Politics and justice: the Lockerbie trial, which was broadcast on 9 September 2007 by Australia's ABC Radio National, Dr Köchler, Robert Black and Jim Swire expressed their views on the Lockerbie trial and the first appeal, and suggested what should happen next.[24]
In the June 2008 edition of the Scottish lawyers' magazine The Firm, Köchler referred to the 'totalitarian' nature of the ongoing second Lockerbie appeal process saying it "bears the hallmarks of an 'intelligence operation'."
For the sake of argument let's say someone was given a 25 year sentence and then, after serving 6 months, was diagnosed with cancer. Would they be let out on compassionate grounds? If not, how is it different? Is it an age thing? or is it the amount of time served relative to the sentence? where's the line?
None of what you write conform to Christian thinking WillE. Why are you wanting to tell other countries what to do? You are usually the first person to tell others to "BUTT OUT" of American affairs. :dunno:
Televised deaths---hmm...that sounds like a 3rd Reich concept. Yes, I realize public deaths were the norm in Middle Ages and through the 1600s, but, times have changed.
Humanity has evolved under a path of Reason.
If acts of brutality occur in the Middle East today, and we want "them" to "change," then why should we resort to similar brutality? Isn't that a hypocrisy that would be impossible to overlook?
christian thinking?
a) this is the 21st century. i sincerely hope such superstitions are now passe
b) have you ever read the bible? one of the most vile, violent, judgmental and perverse things ever committed to paper. their "god" killed all of humanity, except for some guy on a boat, told another guy to kill his son as proof of loyalty, put original sin on christians because yet another dude ate an apple given to him by a talking snake...
There doesn't seem to be much of a difference in the hypothetical you've described. HOWEVER, a distinction can be made if a "Political Statement" can be made. This Lockerbie criminal basically has "political usefulness" for Scotland and Great Britain.
Hmm, dying in Scotland or Libya, which is worse? I can't decide.![]()
To die looking down over the green & pleasant land of England? What a beautiful last image to see. The only downside being that heaven would be a dissapointment! :hatsoff:It could be worse he could have died flying over England :1orglaugh
christian thinking?
a) this is the 21st century. i sincerely hope such superstitions are now passe
b) have you ever read the bible? one of the most vile, violent, judgmental and perverse things ever committed to paper. their "god" killed all of humanity, except for some guy on a boat, told another guy to kill his son as proof of loyalty, put original sin on christians because yet another dude ate an apple given to him by a talking snake...
Youve watched Penn & tellers Bullshit!! about the bible , havent you? :thumbsup:
To die looking down over the green & pleasant land of England? What a beautiful last image to see. The only downside being that heaven would be a dissapointment! :hatsoff:
no, i can't stand penn&teller. i have, however, read the bible. i grew up roman catholic, but i am no longer blind.
no, i can't stand penn&teller. i have, however, read the bible. i grew up roman catholic, but i am no longer blind.
that is from the same wikipedia article i linked to on the previous page.On 20 August 2009, Scotland's Justice Minister, Kenny MacAskill, announced the release of Megrahi under terms of Scottish laws permitting the early release on compassionate grounds of prisoners with less than three months to live. The Scottish authorities and Megrahi's lawyers cited as grounds Megrahi's terminal prostate cancer.
One of the last witnesses for the prosecution was broadcaster and politician, Pierre Salinger, who was questioned by prosecutor Alan Turnbull and by both defence counsel William Taylor and Richard Keen. After his testimony, judge Lord Sutherland asked Salinger to leave the witness box. However, the broadcaster responded:
"That's all? You're not letting me tell the truth. Wait a minute, I know exactly who did it. I know how it was done."
But Lord Sutherland told Salinger:
"If you wish to make a point you may do so elsewhere, but I'm afraid you may not do so in this court."
Youve watched Penn & tellers Bullshit!! about the bible , havent you? :thumbsup: