-
Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!
The Norways shooter Facebook profile (Andres Behring)
- Thread starter plopo
- Start date
julialee89
Porno Junkie
He is a sick bastards of the worst kind. The norwegian police are afraid that he will be lynched by the regular Joe.
he should. man the world is rlly f'ed up. and every serial killer uploads something to youtube before their masacres
lurkingdirk
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Someone's facebook status (related)
julialee89
Porno Junkie
It's seldom I get angry, but: Let him have a huge taste of torture befor we kil him!
Someone's facebook status (related)
As mentioned in another thread: Best post in ages!
Ace Boobtoucher
Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
That stupid cunt would have her head chopped off if she was in a muslim country.
julialee89
Porno Junkie
I wish Norway was a muslim country right now...
All religions are FUCKED!
Ulysses31
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
That would really piss Breivik off
lurkingdirk
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
How so? From behind? Straight on? Anally? Double penetration with two religions carelessly venturing onto each others virgin soil, getting a bit tipsy, and ending up licking each others genitals, pretending they are candy canes?
Atar554
Little Porn Lover
Someone's facebook status (related)
It's not that simple; christians haven't actively organized around concepts like Jihad.
Not saying Muslims deserve to be treated poorly or singled out. But it's not as easy as saying 1 christian is the same as the Taliban or Al Quaeda or the group in Darfur.
Bloodshot Scott
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
They don't want to hear that. They don't want to hear reality during this time. The link I provided in the "Religion of Peace" thread destroyed everyone of them in one post. They know it. You know it. I know it.
lurkingdirk
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
But it is this simple. The Third Reich claimed to be working under "Christian Principles." Yes, that's a lot of years ago, but the sentiment is the same, and a lot more people died under that Reich than have died from crazy Muslims.
Please don't categorize any religion by the people who are fanatics. For example, anyone who judges all Christians from what they learn from watching Pat Robertson is sadly misinformed. Perhaps we should allow for the same to be true of Muslims?
Atar554
Little Porn Lover
I'm not characterizing an entire religion but a religion that possesses the capability to produce extremists; is just that. Humans can recognize patterns and that's a very simple pattern to follow.
Just as you shouldn't divorce the idea that those extremists aren't following the proper teachings of their religion because they don't relate to the common follower. Often times they are just taking things literally where most take it figuratively; read the Old Testament for instance and you'll see what I mean.
Pat Robertson for instance; you claim anyone who judges Christians based on his program is misinformed. Yet his broadcast goes out to millions and he and his associates make tens of millions of dollars I imagine.
His voice is going out to a very large segment of the Christian world; all of it? No ofcourse not but a good percentage of it. He's also in the same vein or has worked with others like Kenneth Copeland and Benny Hinn and Joel Olsteen etc..
They aren't the "lunatic fringe" you make them out to be; they might be out of touch with the global majority but they touch base on a lot of the core beliefs of their respective religions and aren't the minority in terms of there sphere of influence. In reality they wield a lot of power and that power comes from the mass they preach to.
lurkingdirk
I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Two points:
1. Christians who follow Pat Robertson are not following Christian teaching.
2. The percentage of Christians who hear Pat Robertson is extremely small. Think of all the Christians in the world, in all the countries. Then imagine the extreme, right-wing Christians, based mostly in the South of the USA. Yes. A powerful, rich, vocal group. But a tiny part of Christians. And not the smartest bunch.
Here's a suggestion, one that's just from me, and is only my own 2 cents. How about we live in tolerance. Let's believe what we do, and leave the negativity to judgment day. If we believe deeply, then our God will sort these things out, without our intervention.
Trident1
Less than 1,000 posts away from my free Freeones T-shirt
Careful what you wish for.
Imagine a Saudi/Pakistani/Egyptian saying I wish we were a Judeo Christian country.................he'd be hung.
I nice thought.
If a Norwegian or an American or Hungarian wakes up one day and says "I am converting to Islam" there would be no rage or outcry.
However, if a Muslim says "I am converting to Christianity or to become a Jew" there would be outrage and violence from his fellow Muslims.
Islam is not tolerant period. You and I will always be nothing more than a Kuffar to them.
Last edited:
Atar554
Little Porn Lover
You dismiss Pat because you don't align yourself with him; that is a passive way of skirting the issue. Again he doesn't obtain his influence from thin air.
Also I asserted that I agreed that it's not the majority of Christians HOWEVER all religions are made up of sects. Hundreds if not thousands of them; all claiming to be more correct than the others. They all come together under a banner of one religion. For instance Catholics are Christians, Baptists are Christians, Apistolic are Christians, Mormons are Christians.
You can argue which one is more "correct" than another till we all die and turn to dust. But they all relate to each other and they all work more or less together. Therefore they are one religion; when one of them decides to go apeshit and start eating the others or people outside the religion then that is a partial reflection on the religion itself.
Sort of like the saying, "You can judge a society by how it treats its weakest".
That implies that no matter how you identify yourself, if you're a male or female, white, black etc... If you're a member of this country it's partly your responsibility to maintain a certain positive standard in how people are treated. When people are mistreated we're all at fault because we as a whole are society itself.
But people only acknowledge this fact when they complain about where their tax money is going; not so much when people they don't directly know are affected IE: Katrina.
Similar threads
