• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

The Official 2008/2009 NCAA Football Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The BIG-10 has seven bowl tie-ins are they that good of a conference
You sure it's not 10? Sure seems like every year just about every Big 11 team makes it to a bowl game. I thought the Big 11 in 2007 was an absolute joke. Just terrible. One good team (Ohio State's) and a bunch of mediocre to crummy ones. This year? They did better. In my view, aside from the obvious ones (Penn State and Ohio State), Michigan State, Minnesota (props to them for getting to "bowl eligibility this year after a one-win campaign last season, although they finished with four straight losses to end their regular season), Northwestern, and maybe Iowa "deserve" bowl bids (at least in today's watered-down bowl environment). That's six. I know that Indiana, Purdue, Miss-again, and Wisconsin...wait. I just checked the final Big Ten standings for this season and both Minnesota and Wisconsin have enough overall wins to qualify for a bowl game, even though both those teams came in at under .500 in conference play. In my book, I don't care what your overall record is, if you have a sub-.500 conference record by the end of the season, you don't deserve to go to a bowl. Allowing teams like that into bowl games is doing nothing more than rewarding mediocrity. That's all that's doing. But I guess $$$ trumps just about everything else and with all the bowls that exist these days I guess they have to find as many ways to fill them as they can. But if it were up to me I'd give Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan State, Northwestern, and Iowa bowl bids this season, and that's it. But it's not up to me so I guess we'll be seeing Wisconsin and Minnesota in bowl games this season, too. Whatever. I probably won't be watching.
 

Skyraider22

The One and Only Big Daddy
You sure it's not 10? Sure seems like every year just about every Big 11 team makes it to a bowl game. I thought the Big 11 in 2007 was an absolute joke. Just terrible. One good team (Ohio State's) and a bunch of mediocre to crummy ones. This year? They did better. In my view, aside from the obvious ones (Penn State and Ohio State), Michigan State, Minnesota (props to them for getting to "bowl eligibility this year after a one-win campaign last season, although they finished with four straight losses to end their regular season), Northwestern, and maybe Iowa "deserve" bowl bids (at least in today's watered-down bowl environment). That's six. I know that Indiana, Purdue, Miss-again, and Wisconsin...wait. I just checked the final Big Ten standings for this season and both Minnesota and Wisconsin have enough overall wins to qualify for a bowl game, even though both those teams came in at under .500 in conference play. In my book, I don't care what your overall record is, if you have a sub-.500 conference record by the end of the season, you don't deserve to go to a bowl. Allowing teams like that into bowl games is doing nothing more than rewarding mediocrity. That's all that's doing. But I guess $$$ trumps just about everything else and with all the bowls that exist these days I guess they have to find as many ways to fill them as they can. But if it were up to me I'd give Penn State, Ohio State, Michigan State, Northwestern, and Iowa bowl bids this season, and that's it. But it's not up to me so I guess we'll be seeing Wisconsin and Minnesota in bowl games this season, too. Whatever. I probably won't be watching.

Great post I feel the same way too about sub-.500 records in conference that why I think a lot of good teams like Western Michigan will get screw this year don't get me wrong I'm a fan of Wisconsin football but going to a bowlgame with a 3-5 conference record I don't think that is fair to a lot of teams that have a winning record overall and in conference. But hey you are right money does talk.
 

ThatRedWing

MasterBlaster
The Big 10/11 has traditionally been a top conference. It has been down in the last few years. The problem with Big 10/11 teams in Bowl games is that the conference is so physically tough that your beat to hell by the end of the year. Plus the players don't take the games as seriously as they should because their just happy to be out of the fucking cold. :glugglug:
 

assholebythedoor

Baconsalt > WTC7
they should have bowl games in the mud, take a field and wet it down an call it the mud bowl. unless they already do that then I would be mistaken.
 

Skyraider22

The One and Only Big Daddy
I don't know if they have but I think that is good for the players because when most of them make it to the NFL they will have to play in all kinds of weather well expect linghtning of course.
 

assholebythedoor

Baconsalt > WTC7
or a sea bowl where they go out to sea and play on a Giant yacht, then again who knows what could happen if the weather acts permits
 

icerfan

Nikkala made me do it!
They should play bowl games in the cold. This is football we're talking about.
In my fantasy of a Big Ten title game, I want it at either Soldier Field ... or Lambeau! ;)
 

assholebythedoor

Baconsalt > WTC7
but I would love to attend one of those games it exceeds the fact anything is possible in football, plus it would just be nice to go.
 
Okay guys Texas and Texas A&M tonite woh you guys picking I got Texas 35-17
I was reminded earlier today that A&M has won the last two in that series. I'm pretty sure that the Longhorns won't be overlooking their rivals again this season, and besides, Texas appears to be infinitely superior to A&M this year. If the Longhorns don't win that game, and win it going away, I for one will be completely stunned.
 
Yea I hear you if your system was in place it would be alot easier on coaches:rolleyes: and the fan.... So how do you feel about the Texas and A&M match up.IT should be easy for Texas but like I said before they always struggle against them
So much for A & M giving Texas a good game this year. The Longhorns have done what they had to this week to try to impress voters. Can the Sooners do the same?
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
So much for A & M giving Texas a good game this year. The Longhorns have done what they had to this week to try to impress voters. Can the Sooners do the same?

McCoy had a helluva game. He passed Steve Young as Texas' all-time winningest QB and set a school season record for passing yards. The Aggies just had a bad year, finishing at the bottom of the South division. You just knew TAM had troubles when they lost to Arkansas State--a team that is third in the Sun Belt with a 5-5 record overall. That SunBelt conference has balls, though. Look who they schedule!
 
McCoy had a helluva game. He passed Steve Young as Texas' all-time winningest QB and set a school season record for passing yards. The Aggies just had a bad year, finishing at the bottom of the South division. You just knew TAM had troubles when they lost to Arkansas State--a team that is third in the Sun Belt with a 5-5 record overall. That SunBelt conference has balls, though. Look who they schedule!
It just goes to show that just because it's a rivalry game doesn't ALWAYS mean that the seemingly weaker team is going to be able to give the better team a good game. Personally, despite its loss to a Texas Tech team that Oklahoma beat by over 40 points a mere three weeks later, I think the Texas Longhorns have the best football team in the Big XII South this season. I've seen a bunch of stuff written about how "Oklahoma has the advantage this week over Texas 'cause its last opponent is stronger than Texas' last opponent is so it figures to win more 'style points' after its game this week." Maybe. If it beats Oklahoma State's team. I think that's a bigger "if" than Texas beating Texas A & M was. IF the Sooners can beat the Cowboys we'll see how the voters feel afterwards. If it were up to me, unless the Sooners beat the Cowboys by about 3 touchdowns or more, I'd still give the top nod in the Big XII South to Texas. We'll see how the Sooners do tomorrow and then we'll see what the voters think afterwards (Go Cowboys!!).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top