The Wright stuff

[vodkazvictim]

Watching the Wright stuff today.
They were talking about taking children away from criminal parents because criminality runs in families and is nurtured in them via behaviour.

Thoughts?

 

[Ulysses31]

Monkey see, monkey do

 

[Mr. Daystar]

It's in the blood too. I've read books about murderers, that were NEVER around one, or both of their parents...which usually were in prison for violent crimes, or dead, or serious drug addicts...and they exhibited the same sociopath like tendencies.

But yeah, the fruit doesn't fall far from the tree.

 

[Jack Davenport]

 

[mikexmoran]

David Wright - 3rd baseman for the Mets. Not a bad player.

 

[xfire]

Nature versus nurture the experts say it's a fifty/fifty split. Scary really to think it's embedded on one's DNA.

 

[vodkazvictim]

So, we seem to be pretty in favour of taking the babies off the criminals.
So what happens next? They have more babies?
Who pays for these babies to be cared for? Or are we advocating the killing of babies?

 

[Ulysses31]

So, we seem to be pretty in favour of taking the babies off the criminals.
So what happens next? They have more babies?
Who pays for these babies to be cared for? Or are we advocating the killing of babies?

If the bables go to loving families they will ultimately stand a greater chance of growing up to be contributing members of society, kids learn morals and ethics from their parents, some will have the willpower to break free whilst others will just continue along the path their parents took. We could give criminals reduced sentences for the crimes they comit if they promise to have no more children, if they do have more kids it's straight back to jail, an American court did this recently over a negligent mother. Problem is we have hordes of people on benefits who have never worked and have no intention of ever working and because of all the free time on their hands these are the people that have the most kids who will receive terrible parenting, most decent working members of society will even have trouble finding a partner because of the stresses of the rat race and if they do find someone and get married they will probably have just the one kid to fit around their busy careers but at least that kid will most likely have a decent upbringing. Look at this for a mother!:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ildren--forcing-neighbours-sleep-cellars.html

 

[vodkazvictim]

If the bables go to loving families they will ultimately stand a greater chance of growing up to be contributing members of society, kids learn morals and ethics from their parents, some will have the willpower to break free whilst others will just continue along the path their parents took. We could give criminals reduced sentences for the crimes they comit if they promise to have no more children, if they do have more kids it's straight back to jail, an American court did this recently over a negligent mother. Problem is we have hordes of people on benefits who have never worked and have no intention of ever working and because of all the free time on their hands these are the people that have the most kids who will receive terrible parenting, most decent working members of society will even have trouble finding a partner because of the stresses of the rat race and if they do find someone and get married they will probably have just the one kid to fit around their busy careers but at least that kid will most likely have a decent upbringing. Look at this for a mother!:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ildren--forcing-neighbours-sleep-cellars.html

Is now a good time to mention the prevelance of child sexual abuse in Britain's care services?
Is that mother representative of all criminals?
What about if we make political demonstrations illegal? Then people get a record for fighting for what's right and their children removed.

 

[larss]

Simple