• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

What If..........?

Ulysses31

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.

Spleen

Banned?
If an object is traveling in one direction but then goes in the complete opposite direction, no matter how fast it the change happens, for a very tiny fraction of time it must be completely motionless.

So what happens when a bee hits a train window?

Obviously the train doesn't stop, but the bee must go from one direction to the other, which means it must stop for a teeny-tiny amount of time. How does that work?




This always pisses people off. But don't blame me, blame fucking Einstein.
 

Shifty

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
If an object is traveling in one direction but then goes in the complete opposite direction, no matter how fast it the change happens, for a very tiny fraction of time it must be completely motionless.

Why? :dunno:

(Sincerely, I want to know).

So what happens when a bee hits a train window?

Obviously the train doesn't stop, but the bee must go from one direction to the other, which means it must stop for a teeny-tiny amount of time. How does that work?

This always pisses people off. But don't blame me, blame fucking Einstein.

Not sure I follow this. Are you referring to the fact that the bee should be completely motionless for a time after hitting the window? It would be, if not for the motion of the train, no? :dunno:
 

Ulysses31

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
If an object is traveling in one direction but then goes in the complete opposite direction, no matter how fast it the change happens, for a very tiny fraction of time it must be completely motionless.

So what happens when a bee hits a train window?

Obviously the train doesn't stop, but the bee must go from one direction to the other, which means it must stop for a teeny-tiny amount of time. How does that work?




This always pisses people off. But don't blame me, blame fucking Einstein.

what colour is the bee?
 

Icewater Jones

MasterBlaster
True, people actively choose a sexual preference which leaves them vulnerable to verbal & physical abuse. Even death! :rolleyes:

Correct, but not everyone goes into this considering that part of the equation. A lot of those in same-sex relationship aren't in them because they are gay.
 

mrtrebus

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Correct, but not everyone goes into this considering that part of the equation. A lot of those in same-sex relationship aren't in them because they are gay.
Well I don't agree. Anyway in regards to your original question, it wouldn't change the number of gays. Plenty of people already live in sexually joyless relationships for years & years. . .my mother & father for example.
 

Icewater Jones

MasterBlaster
Well I don't agree. Anyway in regards to your original question, it wouldn't change the number of gays. Plenty of people already live in sexually joyless relationships for years & years. . .my mother & father for example.

Good point on the dad and mom quip.

I'm sure at some point there was sex and joy though, right???

BTW:I personally know three different people that have had same-sex relationships for different reasons... and two are now in hetero marriages. I otherwise would not have agreed, like you, if they all hadn't told me this and gone in the direction they did.
 

Ulysses31

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
What if the holocaust happen to the Chinese instead of the Jewish?

Wouldn't rarely work as Jews don't really harm one another whilst the chinese like the russians have wiped out millions of their own people with little care.
 
Top