yes but how do fashion designers expect people to "get" their clothing ideas and eventually purchase a piece if you can't see how it'd fit on a normal sized woman? I've seen runway shows in person and I honestly can't tell how an item of clothing would look on my size 6 frame because it looks limp and lifeless on the size 0 runway model. It'd make more common sense to have a variety of different sizes on the runway to model clothing because then the everyday woman can get a better idea of what the item of clothing would look like on their body. It'd bring fresh new life to fashion IMO and could only improve the appearance of a designers work of art.
True but I think it's the point of having one type of canvas. Designers will occasionally strike out and try a new shape of woman
(a different medium or material to work) but most will stick to what is seen as the base fundamental. Even Pollock painted abstract art on a plain canvas.
Now I'm playing devil's advocate here and I agree with where you're coming from. But I just don't think designers have the capacity to see it that way. They make clothing, not women. Most of it is never meant for the average person anyways. They want a closet of clothing with legs to walk out and show the patterns and textures they put their time into. They don't want anyone thinking;
"Wow she's fucking hot, and the dress ain't bad."
imo they are going for;
"Wow that dress is amazing, how was it made? What is it made of?"
I disagree Petra, well maybe not.
sure the toob mostly shows people who look decent, healthy.
thats the way its always been since recorded history.
so why now do you think its some kind of added pressure 2011 style?
I don't know where you live but the last time I was in the states I think maybe 10% of the women I saw were not overweight.
So what effect is all this pressure having? to me its obvious not much.
I know the reason why people , especially in the states and especially women in the states have given up on their bodies, and started using too much make-up is because men, society have been kissing their asses for a long time now.
putting them on a pedestal more and more as time goes by that most simply have no incentive to look good anymore.
Like I said, even the nastiest, most miserable woman there can get a man who's willing to put up with her bad body and her bullshit just to get some poontang.
I mean is there really that much pressure on women there these days or is there such little pressure that most have just stop caring?
For this I think we need to define what "pressure" really means. Social pressures or self-esteem issues? Cultural differences?
For instance we are seeing more and more heavier ..people in general around the world as they begin to Westernize to an American type diet. French women for instance aren't genetically thin. They just don't have access to a lot of the processed foods and fast food America has. Chain restaurants in America have killed the local food market which is typically healthier. Coupled with jobs that are typically not as physical as they used to be if at all.
Social norms have relaxed as far as divorce and employment and child bearing etc... That could eliminate the idea that women need to get a man to secure their futures vis a vis they have more options and don't all go the same path of looking to what men think is ideal.
There's also the issue of body weight. What is considered "overweight" and "obese" can be inaccurate depending on how it's measured; for instance BMI is completely inaccurate.
In a way what I'm hinting at is while you can argue there's less direct pressure on women to just look "good". There's the pressure of being corporate or self reliant financially, bearing children, keeping a man, having children, and being feminine in general while being an "equal".
In that case it's purely a matter of perspective and how well people cope with their situations and stressors.