sky1lopez said:
that is also becuase of the small population of pornstars campared to the rest of the women in the world, if one dirty ass whoish pornstar got an std is creates a larget impact to thier percentage than sum indignious tribal in africa or asia
A curious analogy considering that the population of Africa is slowing dying from AIDS.
The "impact" of one "whorish pornstar" upon the group as a whole is in fact
tremendous, since the amount of sexual activity within the group is several times higher than in any "normal" populaton.... after all, it's what they do for a living.
The recent HIV outbreak in the porn actor population is a perfect example of this - the virus spread rapidly and, in no time, many, many performers were quarantined, with only a small few even having worked with Darren James (who was the only confirmed case at the time). In other words, one "whorish pornstar" (your words, not mine)... can do a great deal of damage, much more damage than they could ever do in the general population.
In the end, the statistics speak for themselves and are rather straightforward in their interpretation:
The STD rates are much higher for pornstars than fore the general population ergo... you have a much higher chance of getting a STD from a pornstar than you do someone who works in a different profession.