• Do you have credits to spend? Why not pick up some VOD rentals? Find out how!

You're Fired and your boss demands that you vacate within 1 hour . .

Facetious

Moderated
. . but the law says that you have a full 30 days before you depart ! :dunno:

N/A for the messianic obama ! He gets to rule as he pleases !




An inspector general fired by President Obama says he was given no warning and only one hour to decide whether to resign or be let go, hinting the action was retaliation for a report highly critical of Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, a former NBA basketball star and an Obama supporter.

Gerald Walpin, a 2006 Bush appointee who reviewed grants awarded by AmeriCorps and other national service programs, said the telephone call he received Thursday evening from White House counsel Norman L. Eisen informing him he was ousted “occurred totally out of the blue.”

Mr. Walpin said he and his staff had always acted with the “highest integrity” during his two-and-a-half-year tenure. “We performed very well the responsibility of the independent overseer of the agency, and reported things as we saw it,” he said.

The White House hasn’t said specifically why it fired Mr. Walpin, other than to say that the president has lost confidence in him.

“It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General,” said Mr. Obama in a letter to Congress Thursday. “That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector General.”

In an e-mail response to Mr. Eisen Thursday, Mr. Walpin said he refused to resign on such short notice because “it would do a disservice to the independent scheme [for inspector generals] that Congress had mandated - and could potentially raise questions about my own integrity - if I were to render what would seem to many a very hasty response to your request.”

But Mr. Walpin, in his e-mail to Mr. Eisen, said he wasn’t convinced of the White House’s assertion that his firing and the release of two reports he recently submitted that are highly critical of AmeriCorps parent group, the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), wasn’t “coincidence.”

“I would suggest there is a high likelihood that others may see it otherwise,” Mr. Walpin wrote.

One of Mr. Walpin’s reports dealt with his investigation of a highly publicized case accusing St. Hope Academy - founded by Mr. Johnson - of mishandling some of the $850,000 it received in CNCS grants, which came out during the Sacramento mayoral race. Mr. Johnson’s nonprofit group has promised to repay about half of the money.

But Sacramento’s Acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence G. Brown has sharply criticized Mr. Walpin’s handling of his investigation of Mr. Johnson and the nonprofit group.

In August 2008, while Mr. Johnson was campaigning for his successful November election, Mr. Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney’s office, which said his conclusions seemed overstated and didn’t accurately reflect the information gathered in the investigation.

The report said Mr. Johnson used grants to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities and to run personal errands for Mr. Johnson.

Mr. Brown accused Mr. Walpin of overstepping his authority, compromising his impartiality and withholding information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
more



This is serious scandal material that's been / being swept under the rug.
Can you imagine how this would be handled had this activity occurred under a republikan president ! ?

Remember a couple of years ago when the democrats made a huge fuss over absolutely nothing when "w'' terminated some of the previous administrations' (Bill Clinton appts) U.S. attorneys ?

Hell, Bill Clinton fired every single one of the GHW Bush U.S. attorney appointments on the spot !

And here is obama today : HANDS OFF THE FORMER NBA ALL STAR POINT GUARD / CURRENT SACRAMENTO MAYOR !
 

Baill Inneraora

I changed my middle-name to Freeones
The U.S. Attorney’s scandal was less about them being fired and more about how the Bush White House and the Justice Department were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians and others were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters
 

georges

Moderator
Staff member
definitely not astonishing.
 
Not the beginning of a 'beautiful relationship'....
 

DukeLaCrosse

I eat, sleep, and live FreeOnes!
facetious your an idiot
 

Facial_King

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Well, that was certainly an interesting blog post from "Daniel," Facetious. But if there was some wrongdoing here, I'm all for it being investigated and those responsible being held accountable. Sure, let's investigate.

The question is, if the identical charges were levelled against the Bush administration, would you - and "Daniel" the reporter - be all gung-ho in pursuing them, or would you you just chalk it up to some resentful liberals, maybe Michael Moore, etc.??

Dems are fully capable of being petty, I know, but I do notice a real, substantive difference between Dem presidencies and GOP presidencies. When a Republican is president, if the Dems can have their arms twisted far enough to actually take action, it's over something significant, some real wrongdoing, a crime of some sort.

When a Dem is in office, the right-wing is just so damn eager to get him they lose all sense of perspective. If he releases a fart that's slightly too moist, they call in Ken Starr.
 

titsrock

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Facetious, there's a new Sheriff in town...what do you expect? Obama will just *literally* continue the misery of Dubya's Administration?

Change is coming. Change has come. :dunno:

This guy in the article sounds like a total crybaby douche, btw. Another GOP gone kickin' and screamin' from his gov't job?

I thought the Elephants hate the Gov't...?
 
Kill The Messenger :sing: This time round :sing:
 

Hot Mega

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
From your article;

But Sacramento’s Acting U.S. Attorney Lawrence G. Brown has sharply criticized Mr. Walpin’s handling of his investigation of Mr. Johnson and the nonprofit group.

In August 2008, while Mr. Johnson was campaigning for his successful November election, Mr. Walpin referred the matter to the local U.S. attorney’s office, which said his conclusions seemed overstated and didn’t accurately reflect the information gathered in the investigation.

The report said Mr. Johnson used grants to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities and to run personal errands for Mr. Johnson.

Mr. Brown accused Mr. Walpin of overstepping his authority, compromising his impartiality and withholding information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Assuming Mr. Brown's assertions are valid and true...Case closed IMO. What should Obama have done? Ignored the assertions and/evidence against Walpin by a state A.G?
 

Dean Wormer

Tip: install a spycam in your toilet.
. . but the law says that you have a full 30 days before you depart ! :dunno:

N/A for the messianic obama ! He gets to rule as he pleases !

Probably because political appointees are exempt from any workers rights laws.

And what law says you have a full 30 days before you depart? I've seen plenty of people fired and they left that day.
 
Top