• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

Self-proclaimed former America Nazi Party leader to run unopposed in GOP Primary

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Holocaust denier running for Congress has no opponents in Republican primary


0f4d858c-7510-4109-abe1-b2b05f19344a-screen-shot-2018-02-05-at-34838-pm.png



Like most candidates running for Congress, Arthur Jones has a campaign website.
It outlines the Republican candidate’s educational background, stance on issues and how to donate to his campaign to represent Illinois’ 3rd Congressional District.
It also lays out Jones’s unapologetically racist and anti-Semitic views.
In a section called “Holocaust?” Jones describes the atrocities as a “racket” and “the biggest, blackest, lie in history.”
Under another tab titled “Flags of Conflict,” he lists the Confederate flag first and describes it as “a symbol of White pride and White resistance” and “the flag of a White counter revolution.”
And in his most recent blog post — dated Aug. 24 — Jones rails against “Radical Leftists” and blames them for starting racial violence that had roiled Charlottesville about two weeks earlier. Heather Heyer, 32, a protester at a white supremacist rally, died after a driver rammed a car into a crowd of demonstrators. A self-professed neo-Nazi has been charged with first-degree murder in the incident. Jones painted the death as an accident.

Despite his views, Jones is all but certain to become the GOP nominee in one of Illinois’s most prominent congressional districts — one that includes parts of Chicago and several suburbs to the west and southwest. Jones is running unopposed in the Republican primary; the deadline for candidates to file was in early December.

His chances of winning the seat are extremely slim. The district is rated “safely Democratic,” according to Ballotpedia, and two Democrats are facing off: Marie Newman and incumbent Daniel Lipinski. An independent candidate, Mat Tomkowiak, withdrew from the race.

Still, even getting this far in the race is a new milestone for Jones. Over three decades, he has unsuccessfully thrown his hat into the ring for the 3rd District seat seven times, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.
When Sun-Times reporter Frank Main drove to Lyons, Ill., to track down Jones, the candidate was no less vocal about his extreme views.
“Well first of all, I’m running for Congress not the chancellor of Germany, all right?” Jones told Main. “To me, the Holocaust is what I said it is: It’s an international extortion racket.”
Jones also told the newspaper that he was once a leader in the American Nazi Party and now leads the America First Committee — an organization whose membership “is open to any white American citizen of European, non-Jewish descent.

Jones did not immediately respond to interview requests Sunday afternoon. It’s unclear how he arrived at the opinion that the Holocaust, a systematic genocide in which an estimated 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazi regime, was a sham.

Jones has been involved with at least half a dozen racist groups stretching back to the 1970s
, according to the Anti-Defamation League, which has a page devoted to Jones on its website. From 2008 and 2011, Jones was known to have participated in events celebrating the birthday of Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, the ADL page states.
He was also among those who protested the 2009 opening of the Illinois Holocaust Museum and Education Center in Skokie, Ill., according to Haaretz.

In 2016, the state election board tossed Jones from the ballot for the 3rd District for “flagrant disregard of the election code,” the Chicago Tribune reported, although a lawyer for the board did not specify why Jones’s signatures were not valid.
The newspaper that year also highlighted Jones’s former membership in the American National Socialist Workers Party, which the Southern Poverty Law Center lists as a relatively recent offshoot of the National Socialist Movement, “one of the largest and most prominent neo-Nazi groups in the United States.”

Representatives from the Illinois Republican Party did not respond to questions sent by email Sunday. But Tim Schneider, the chairman of the Illinois GOP, told the Sun-Times that the party denounced Jones.

The Illinois Republican Party and our country have no place for Nazis like Arthur Jones,” Schneider told the newspaper. “We strongly oppose his racist views and his candidacy for any public office, including the 3rd Congressional District.”
The National Republican Congressional Committee, which supports conservative candidates, balked at questions about Jones.
This guy is a fringe candidate who has been doing this for over a decade with no real connection to the GOP,” NRCC spokesman Jesse Hunt said in a Sunday-night email.
Writing about Jones, Hunt said, “gives him exactly what he wants: a platform. And quite frankly I find it shameful.”

Jones’s candidacy comes at a time when far-right groups have had new clout in the national discussion: Some hate groups have ramped up recruitment on college campuses and, for a time, some far-right leaders imagined they had an ally in the White House in Stephen K. Bannon, who served as an adviser to President Trump before departing his post in August.
Last week, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) was criticized for bringing an accused Holocaust denier as his guest to the State of the Union address. Gaetz later defended himself, saying he didn’t know who Chuck Johnson was when he invited him to the speech.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...in-republican-primary/?utm_term=.be8e5c869eb9

First to those who would think the article comes from the Washington Post, a well known liberal-biased media, Breitbart has also denounced Arthur Jone :
‘I Hate Illinois Nazis’: GOP Tries, Fails to Stop Antisemite from Running Unopposed in Primary
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ls-stop-antisemite-running-unopposed-primary/


I think we can all agree the guy's a real nazi. He claims he's a former American Nazi Party, he's a holocaust denier, an anti-semite. What else do you need ?
Now, conservatives on the board often told the nazis were leftists. Then how come a nazi like Arthur Jones be the nominee for the Republicans in a congressional election ?
He's been denounced by the party but isn't there anything they could do now (or could have done before, the guy's been running for decades, it's not like he was a rookie) to fire him from the party ?

I know this seat is almost guaranteed to Democrats but couldn't there be another GOP primary candidate, so that this motherfucker wouldn't become the nominee and get a platform for his despicable views ?

Just like Roy Moore, this is gonna be real bad publicity for the GOP, not only in Illinois but all around the country.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Should we look for every fringe candidate running in Democrat primaries? I bet we can find a bunch.

He’s running unopposed because....














There aren’t many if any Republicans at all in a predominantly Democrat District!!!!!!
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Should we look for every fringe candidate running in Democrat primaries? I bet we can find a bunch.

He’s running unopposed because....

I highly doubt you can find anything as shameful as a nazi not only running in the primary but about to win the nomination...
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
I highly doubt you can find anything as shameful as a nazi not only running in the primary but about to win the nomination...

Sure we can. Two are already elected as Democrat senate and house minority leaders.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Schumer and Pelosi are worst than nazis ?
You would vote for a self-proclaimed nazi rather than vote for Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi ?
 

Straight Shooter

1,000 posts to go for my own user title!
Schumer and Pelosi are worst than nazis ?
You would vote for a self-proclaimed nazi rather than vote for Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi ?

This is another example of Republicans just giving away seats. Todd Akin, Sharon Angle, Roy Moore, Christine O'Donnell,etc The incumbent Dan Lipinski is one of the last conservative Dems in Congress. I've been following this race closely because he's being primaried by a Justice Democrat named Marie Newman. The 3rd congressional district, suburbs southwest of Chicago, is very interesting because it's been blue for a long time despite the fact that it's a very socially conservative area. If the GOP could get their act together they could run a moderate/establishment candidate and probably win
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
So Trump rules over me ? 'cause Rachel time I critcize him, I end up with Trump fans going after me.

About that "nazi grandma", she's been sentenced but she won't go to jail. In Europe, we don't put elders behind bars.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
You would vote for a self-proclaimed nazi rather than vote for Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi ?



That one's worth a five facepalm salute... :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm: :facepalm:
You would vote for either of those marxists? After their display at the SOTU, they have proven that they are unamerican and could care less about the well being of the country. They would fit in well with the National German Workers Party.
Right back atchange.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Calling Schumer and Pelosi clearly demonstrate you know nothing about politics.
Even Bernie, who's far left from these two, isn't even close from being a marxist. He's a social democrat, like Tony Blair was
And even if they we're marxists, the only right choice between marxists and nazis is neither. Picking one over the other is like picking Plague over Cholera.
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
Calling Schumer and Pelosi clearly demonstrate you know nothing about politics.
Even Bernie, who's far left from these two, isn't even close from being a marxist. He's a social democrat, like Tony Blair was
And even if they we're marxists, the only right choice between marxists and nazis is neither. Picking one over the other is like picking Plague over Cholera.

I live in the country where their destructive Marxist policies have been imposed, you don’t.

I have forgotten more about politics than you’ll ever know.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
I live in the country where their destructive Marxist policies have been imposed, you don’t.

I have forgotten more about politics than you’ll ever know.
You live in the US, marxist policies have never been imposed in the US.
You don't know what marxism is, you don't know the difference between, communism, socialism and marxism, you're just throwing these words like some leftists like to thrown "nazi" or "fascist" when they run out of arguments.

I'm younger than you I think, I don't know how old you are but I guess you're older than you) but I know way more about politics than you
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
You live in the US, marxist policies have never been imposed in the US.
You don't know what marxism is, you don't know the difference between, communism, socialism and marxism, you're just throwing these words like some leftists like to thrown "nazi" or "fascist" when they run out of arguments.

I'm younger than you I think, I don't know how old you are but I guess you're older than you) but I know way more about politics than you

The fuck they haven’t been imposed, not on the level that you’d like but it has taken a foothold here.. As a matter of fact, the police state tactics of the IRS and FBI are straight out of the Marxist playbook. Wealth redistribution is a tenet of Karl Marx’s ideology. The nuances between communism and Marxism are minimal hence Marx and Engels’ “ Communist Manifesto” . The Euro version that you have experienced mixed with capitalism is not true socialism, You’d have to live in the old Soviet bloc to experience it.

As for my understanding of politics, I have proven to know far more than you and do so on a daily basis. I only entered law school with a degree in political science from one of the top universities in the nation.
Mind your own fucked up academics.
 

Johan

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
As a matter of facts, wealth redistributions is a tenet of Marx playbook but Marx specifically said it requires the government to seize all wealth and ressources first. That's socialism. Communism is the next step : government is taken down, wealth and ressources belong to the community
And yes, only soviet-bloc countries experienced experienced socialism and no country ever experienced communism.

Now, the difference between socialism ans marxism aren't "minimal hence" : Marxism is Marx's belief that in a capitalist system, workers sell their labor, which generate surplus for capitalists but not for workers, resulting in a an inequity to the benefit of the woner and to the deficit of the worrkers and that, to break that inequity, the workers should take power and build a new society. Socialism (and communism) is Marx's "blue-print" for that new society.
Claiming that the difference between marxism and socialism is "minimal hence" is like claiming the difference between diagnostic and treat in "minimal hence".
You may have studied law but I can stiil school you about politics. Sad, as your Dear Leader would say...

Mind your own fucked up academics.
You started questionning my knowledge about politics so you "Mind your own fucked up academics".
 

Jack Davenport

I'm too lazy to set a usertitle.
As a matter of facts, wealth redistributions is a tenet of Marx playbook but Marx specifically said it requires the government to seize all wealth and ressources first. That's socialism. Communism is the next step : government is taken down, wealth and ressources belong to the community
And yes, only soviet-bloc countries experienced experienced socialism and no country ever experienced communism.

Now, the difference between socialism ans marxism aren't "minimal hence" : Marxism is Marx's belief that in a capitalist system, workers sell their labor, which generate surplus for capitalists but not for workers, resulting in a an inequity to the benefit of the woner and to the deficit of the worrkers and that, to break that inequity, the workers should take power and build a new society. Socialism (and communism) is Marx's "blue-print" for that new society.
Claiming that the difference between marxism and socialism is "minimal hence" is like claiming the difference between diagnostic and treat in "minimal hence".
You may have studied law but I can stiil school you about politics. Sad, as your Dear Leader would say...

You started questionning my knowledge about politics so you "Mind your own fucked up academics".

So you essentially agreed with everything that I said but yet you schooled me.

Hahaha
 
Top