Unprotected Pornography, Infections & Diseases -
How is it that unprotected pornography is a legal business and even glamorized even given the fact that regardless of the fact that no amount of tests taken can foolproof a person from STD's & STI's?
The reason I ask this is because false negatives are common & even mutated and new forms of diseases are found even in the general public, nevermind people who prostitute themselves by ways of pornography that do not show up as positive for any defined disease, but still carry the same symptoms, require the same medications that remove the STD's, and may even lead to newer incurable diseases in time given the increase in acceptance of unprotected Pornography/Prostitution.
This is just one big science experiment that I believe one day may be destined for a new outbreak related to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
This type of behavior isn't encouraged to teenagers who are biologically capable of having sex & it isn't acceptable as anything deserving of any merits for helping humanity. It makes zero sense how it is even legal.
This thread is specifically about the unprotected version of Prostitution/Pornography.
Given that it was on the ballot in some places in hopes of forced protection for Pornography/Prostitution, but it didn't do well enough to accomplish trying to minimize the spread of Infections/diseases in this manner.
This is a major health crisis just waiting to happen.
Given the rise of STD's/STI's in the past couple years in California, where a huge part of pornography is produced, this information shouldn't be taken lightly.
Unprotected Pornography/Prostitution is unethical and should be discouraged 100%, not fought for as if it is some kind of consitutional right.
How is it that unprotected pornography is a legal business and even glamorized even given the fact that regardless of the fact that no amount of tests taken can foolproof a person from STD's & STI's?
The reason I ask this is because false negatives are common & even mutated and new forms of diseases are found even in the general public, nevermind people who prostitute themselves by ways of pornography that do not show up as positive for any defined disease, but still carry the same symptoms, require the same medications that remove the STD's, and may even lead to newer incurable diseases in time given the increase in acceptance of unprotected Pornography/Prostitution.
This is just one big science experiment that I believe one day may be destined for a new outbreak related to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
This type of behavior isn't encouraged to teenagers who are biologically capable of having sex & it isn't acceptable as anything deserving of any merits for helping humanity. It makes zero sense how it is even legal.
This thread is specifically about the unprotected version of Prostitution/Pornography.
Given that it was on the ballot in some places in hopes of forced protection for Pornography/Prostitution, but it didn't do well enough to accomplish trying to minimize the spread of Infections/diseases in this manner.
This is a major health crisis just waiting to happen.
Given the rise of STD's/STI's in the past couple years in California, where a huge part of pornography is produced, this information shouldn't be taken lightly.
Unprotected Pornography/Prostitution is unethical and should be discouraged 100%, not fought for as if it is some kind of consitutional right.
