Photographer Bernd Daktari Lorenz (of Bettie Ballhaus, Milena Velba, et al.) ...

[Torre82]

Fan? I'm rarely a fan of any pornstar. Not for lack of respect for the field, but it's not like your personality ever shows thru while you're on-camera. I dont buy porn, I barely watch it. It's there to fulfill a need.

Women? My words are what I hear everyday. I tend to date.. well to be realistic I dont date. I fuck MILF's and they have a no-nonsense way of telling me what they want. 'I want to be fucked hard, then eat my hole for another hour.' was actually just spoken to me recently. I dunno what value people place on words.. but in the bedroom they're either spoken to opposite effect and 'cunt' seems to be a turn on instead of a travesty..or it just doesnt matter at all with the women I'm with. I live in Indiana.. where there's two things to do.. fuck.. and go to work. "Sex is the opera of the poor" sums it up nicely.

Attitude toward women? The women I see dont respect themselves, so I know they dont respect me. I treat them realistically. Come over, sit on my cock, try not to lie to me too much. Stay?

 

[BananaPalmer]

I'll ogle any porn you put in front of me. Minge-moustaches, Kojaks, booferelloes, chest-bunyons, footsies, tootsies, fingerwarmers, felching soirees, toy stories, popular mechanics, fruit baskets, fisherman's baskets, Bangkok bazookas, Wombling, splodging, golden showers and bronze showers, to name but a few, and I don't care how good or bad the photography is. I don't care if it's black-'n'-white, sepia, colour, overexposed, underexposed, exposed or just plain grainy, I'll ogle it all, as long as it's legal, of course, I'm not odd.
Oglero :eek:

 

[broderic_randal]

Angela White[/URL][/B], post: 2914725, member: 174191"]

:tongue:

 

[Torre82]

I'll ogle any porn you put in front of me. Minge-moustaches, Kojaks, booferelloes, chest-bunyons, footsies, tootsies, fingerwarmers, felching soirees, toy stories, popular mechanics, fruit baskets, fisherman's baskets, Bangkok bazookas, Wombling, splodging, golden showers and bronze showers, to name but a few, and I don't care how good or bad the photography is. I don't care if it's black-'n'-white, sepia, colour, overexposed, underexposed, exposed or just plain grainy, I'll ogle it all, as long as it's legal, of course, I'm not odd.
Oglero :eek:

Nicely filthed, Palmer.

 

[dogbone27]

I think he is a great photographer, I'm a big fan of his work. I like how he seem to show respect to the models he work with "unlike" Some photographers that treat the models they work with like crap. I've heard many stories about photographers being pricks and Jackasses...

 

[BananaPalmer]

Nicely filthed, Palmer.

I just blurt it how I ogle it, Torre, and if it gets me into strife then tough-titties. I like to ogle them, too.
Oglero :eek:

 

[Prophecy]

Hey Prophecy,

I totally respect that you don't like The SCORE Group's photography, each to their own. But I can assure you that they don't actually "try to press models into the phantasies of some of their photographers". You may have been talking on a metaphorical level but just in case you weren't I just wanted to set the record straight and say that there is no 'pressure' for a model to do anything while working in SCORE. At least my experience with SCORE has always been great.

Is there any examples you can give me of a SCORE model "making her a parody of herself"? You can say me if you want! HA hA! :1orglaugh :laugh: No, seriously, I'm just curious why you personally don't like SCORE - the lighting, the make-up, the poses, the locations etc?

Hi Angela,

yes, you are right, I did not mean that they force them into poses they don't like - I was talking about their style, as you correctly pointed out. It was me who introduced the whole photographer categories and articles on Boobpedia, and I wrote the article on Bernd Lorenz, because I thought that an encyclopedia on big boobs is quite poor without mentioning the people who make it possible that we see all these wonderful pictures of our favourite models.

Therefore I surfed a lot through all the sites and collected examples of different photographers' works. It is purely my own personal taste when I say that I do not like Scoreland; it's exactly what you mentioned: I have seen a few models before they had a contract with Scoreland, and I clearly prefer the other photographers' views of them. It's, above all, the lighting and the make-up I don't like. I think they often do not fit the model's appearance (or what I think or prefer to be the model's appearance). They do not seem to take so much care about backgrounds, the clothing (actually I already spotted out something like a "Scoreland wardrobe" they seem to give various models for their shoots) and the overall atmosphere of a pictorial. Lorenz, on the other hand, focuses very much on what he thinks to be "the perfect image". I already thought that before, and I learned in this thread that it's true. To me, Scoreland seems to be more a kind of mass production, whereas Lorenz is following his idea of style and works hard to make it perfect.

Take Jolie Rain (Boobpedia article) for example. In her (now offline) Model Mayhem profile, she said that she'd like to do fetish pictures, and the photographs there showed a nice style, for example the picture in the infobox of the Boobpedia article. Now have a look at a Scoreland gallery of her. Don't we know this denim top from somewhere? Ah, yes, it's from the Scoreland wardrobe, Christy Marks has worn it already. Well, it's nice anyway and I guess they washed it - and perhaps it's just their way of making their pictorials more recognisable. But Christy Marks is another example. I liked her look before she signed with Scoreland. Although her pics were kind of amateurish, she looked cute, and I liked her Big Naturals pictorial too. But her appearance changed completely after Scoreland, and I think the hairstyle and make-up do not fit her. I hope she's happy with that, because that's the most important thing. But you cannot deny that Scoreland somewhat recreated her (along with a new stage name).

Ah, by the way: The whole Boobpedia clothing section is from me too, but I wasn't able to identify one single bra you were wearing in your sets. Too bad, they are nice. Perhaps you could be of assistance?

Regards

Prophecy

 

[Prophecy]

Added a filmography to his Boobpedia article:

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Bernd_Daktari_Lorenz

Does anyone know where I can get pictures of the covers of his later big bust films? I'd like to add them to the filmography.

Regards

Prophecy

 

[om3ga]

10/10 - a top-notch photographer........:thumbsup:

 

[Member2019]

Sophie Mei at nadine-j.de ...

Can someone confirm/deny these sets of hers, examples shown in the link and pics below ...

http://charnelles.canalblog.com/archives/2009/05/25/13844731.html



[ From my quotes/post here: http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=3265284 ]

Were indeed done by Lorenz for Nadine's?

Most people are only familiar with her popoular DDF shoot, and as much as I love the DDF set, I love these as "more lady/beauty."

 

[Prophecy]

Re: Sophie Mei at nadine-j.de ...

Can someone confirm/deny these sets of hers, examples shown in the link and pics below ...

http://charnelles.canalblog.com/archives/2009/05/25/13844731.html



[ From my quotes/post here: http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=3265284 ]

Were indeed done by Lorenz for Nadine's?

Most people are only familiar with her popoular DDF shoot, and as much as I love the DDF set, I love these as "more lady/beauty."

To be frank, as soon as I see a "nadine-j.de" or "milena-velba.de" on a photo, I assume that it was Mr. Lorenz who did it, because I do not know of any guest photographer ever appearing on their respective sites.

Regards

Prophecy

 

[AsawaMararItih]

I want to start a "Talk" thread dedicated to photographer Bernd Daktari Lorenz. You'll find his Babepedia page here:
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Bernd_Daktari_Lorenz

He started by discovering Bettie Ballhaus and started her site, although they split in 2004. Since then, he's photographed -- some exclusively -- these many other women which are also listed at Babepedia in a category just for him:
http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Category:Bernd_Daktari_Lorenz_models

I think Mr. Lorenz has utterly perfected the photography of the voluptuous form, well outside of any post-processing. He understands that when dealing with the models he photographs, the women make the clothes and the clothes hug the curves. He knows how to dress such curves, photograph from the correct angles -- all around as well as perfecting the frontal, back from side and other positions. He started in the '80s and seemingly went beyond the common Playboy pose and scenes (which are now cliche and Playboy itself avoids) and added far more originality, scene, contrast and highlighted the curvature of the woman as a whole, in her surroundings. I haven't seen this in any other outfit, although some photographers with DDF are almost as good in bringing out the best in curves, but still different (do they use Lorenz?).

He does this without massive focus on the breast and total avoidance of close-ups on the genitalia in general, unlike virtually every other, major publication house photograher in the adult industry. Even his bondage scenes are erotic, and I'm not into bondage. He avoids the "extreme sex" and "extreme focus" and seems to get it right in focus on the extreme curves and presence of the woman as a whole. Whether the woman is 36+-24-36 or 40+-30-40, the results are unique and extremely lustful to a new level, at least for myself.

Not only does his work with Bettie Ballhaus, Milena Velba (who is an exclusive) and Nadine Jansen which top many favorites, but his Tanya Song (fka Anna Song) and Katarina Hartlova (aka Kathy Kozy) work is absolutely their best shots. And then you have some, additional exclusives like Anna Marie and Sunny Wagner -- I absolutely love his work with Sunny, especially as she's widened and become extremely, drop-dead georgeous. I absolutely love his more recent sets of Angela White, who has always been the classic figure that has been making my draw drop ever since I first saw her at 18 (and took Voluptuous magazine's top title last year). I honestly wish Chloe Vevrier would use him, or at least stop the overkill airbrushing. I know she just hit 40, but damn, she's looking the best she ever did (including very much above the neck).

If God Herself could best paint a picture of Her most heavenly creations for the desire of every man from afar, She'd have results much on point with Lorenz, or at least Lorenz comes as close as he could in my book. About my only criticism is that some of the women in some of the scenes could use a tad less make-up, at they have natural beauty. At the same time, I will fully admit his scenes are both well complementary and the resulting skin and other tones in the scene quite contrasted perfectly with the make-up. Art is not always about bringing about the ultimate beauty in the woman, but setting a complete scene that is of ultimate beauty. I, for one, will say he has master the woman as the beautiful, often classy, centerpiece in any of his work.

He is a great photographer. I voted 10 for his work.