The Biden Presidency

[xfire]

The whole damn Trump family was found guilty of charity fraud, but yeah, Hunter Biden deserves to be disproportionately roasted/convicted because dEmOcRaT. And that's the least of what The Orange Swine Trump and his crime family are gulity of. GFY @georges.

 

[gmase]

Welle let's not forget that if Biden was so irreprochable as he wouldn't invoke the executive privilege in order to block the emails from his son, but knowing Creepy Joe Biden, he invoked executive privilege to block 200 Hunter Business dealings emails . Furthermore to that how do you explain that Hunter Biden allegedly used Air Force 2 for overseas trips, that now lawmakers demand records . Pretty sure it has a lot to with Business dealings with Chinese firms. Also how do you explain the beyond despicable attitude from a president with Biden talking once again about lightning strike, small kitchen fire at house and comparing it to Maui devastation , it is degrading and insulting towards the victims of the Maui devastation, yet again Creepy Joe makes a sick joke of what happened which was a real drama (it is not the first he makes such gaffes) . Not everybody is forgiving with that kind of humor or should I say this way of making deliberate stupid gaffes. Another thing is that unemployment spikes as job market continue to cool, not a very encouraging sign of the Bidenomics.

You do realize Trump has been using ‘executive privilege’ pretty broadly, correct? Or has the Western Journal not reported on it? For someone who once said ‘only guilty people take the 5th’, he invokes it quite liberally in its many forms.

To be clear: No one (Biden, Trump, Hunter, Jared, et al.) is above reproach. We all are accountable. To be honest, in this two-tier justice system we have here, the rich and powerful are not held very accountable.

As for Maui - instead of worrying about some throw away comments from a political figure, we worry about the uninsulated power lines which may have been the proximate cause? Maui learned the same lesson as California a few years back. If you ignore the maintenance in exchange for short-term profits, the public pays.

https://apnews.com/article/hawaii-w...r-utilities-9f23f79821ea50256f0725ac9b0b3905#

All Presidents have turned into gaffe machines. It is a job requirement now. Biden at least owns up to it:
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/25/joe-biden-2020-public-gaffes-mistakes-history

You remember when Trump was glorifying those Revolutionary War troops for occupying airports? We could play this tit-for-tat game until kingdom come.

 

[gmase]

A tale of two headlines:

Headline: Unemployment Rate Spikes in New Jobs Report, Defying Economist's Expectations
https://www.westernjournal.com/unem...-jobs-report-defying-economists-expectations/

• Is a 3-basis point rise from 3.5% to 3.8% really a spike? The article notes that 187,000 new jobs were added despite economists anticipating 170,000.

Headline: US adds 187K jobs in August, jobless rate rises to 3.8 percent
https://thehill.com/business/4182653-us-adds-187k-jobs-in-august-jobless-rate-rises-to-3-8-percent/

• This article actually provided context about the increase in unemployment: "While the jobless rate rose 0.3 percentage points in August, the labor force participation rate rose 0.2 percentage points after being largely flat since March."

 

[xfire]

The Western Journal would be more accurately named The Western Diaper.

 

[gmase]

Diapers do need regular changes.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/western-journalism/
Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico/
Overall, we rate Politico Left-Center biased based on story selection and editorial positions that slightly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/
Overall, we rate The Hill Least Biased based on balanced editorial positions and news reporting that is low-biased. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to previous opinion columns promoting unproven claims.

 

[gmase]

Biden's disapproval rating reaches 56% AND he's in a dead-heat with Trump. Time for Plan B?
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...-rating-hits-highest-mark-of-presidency-poll/

 

[Supafly]

The one and I believe deciding factor that will, if he pulls through with his second candidacy, decide his election is:

He is NOT Donald J. Trump.

 

[tvstrip]

The one and I believe deciding factor that will, if he pulls through with his second candidacy, decide his election is:

He is NOT Donald J. Trump.

Which is why the GOP needs to ensure they have a new candidate if they hope to have a chance.

 

[tvstrip]

US House expects Wednesday vote on formalizing Biden impeachment inquiry - aide
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ng-biden-impeachment-inquiry-aide/ar-AA1lm116

Obviously this will not make it past the Senate, but it's almost funny that this might mean 2 presidencies in a row who faced impeachment.

 

[gmase]

Obviously this will not make it past the Senate, but it's almost funny that this might mean 2 presidencies in a row who faced impeachment.

After going 1 for 41, the US will be 3 for the last 5. I’m not certain the Biden inquiry will lead to an impeachment vote. They first need to find the evidence to support their hypotheses.

 

[tvstrip]

After going 1 for 41, the US will be 3 for the last 5. I’m not certain the Biden inquiry will lead to an impeachment vote. They first need to find the evidence to support their hypotheses.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they generally vote along party lines, so the evidentiary threshold to get to a vote is probably pretty low.

 

[gmase]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they generally vote along party lines, so the evidentiary threshold to get to a vote is probably pretty low.

You are correct and my statement was too vague. Getting to a vote will be easy enough, actually impeaching Biden will be tougher without new evidence.

A better way to phrase it:
After going 1 for 41, the US will be 3 for the last 5. I’m not certain the Biden inquiry will lead to an actual impeachment. They first need to find the evidence to support their hypotheses.